Forbidden knowledge Forward 1

The Turin Papyrus lists some of the names of the Gods of Egypt like Ra or Marduk, son of Ptah, who was Enki; Geb and Nut, Parents of Osiris and Seth; Osiris, great grand-son of Ra; Seth, brother of Osiris; and Horus, orphan and son of Osiris and Isis; Thoth, son of Enki, and Ninhursag - his wife and sister.
It begins with: I,x - I,21: Ptah and the Great Ennead
I,22 - II,3 : Horus and the Lesser Ennead (?)
II,4 - II,8 : the spirits
II,9 : a mythical group of kings
II,10 : another group of mythical kings (?)
It then lists the human gods like Narmer, Menes etc.

Then we have rulers of Sumeria like; Marduk, son of Enki; Ashtereth, also known as Nin-khursag, wife of Enki;, and Sin, Ninurta, and Sargon, sons of Enlil. Enki had six sons. They were; Marduk, NER.GAL, GABIL, NIN.A.GAL, and DUMU.ZI. These gods of Sumeria are the same gods the Egyptians knew by their Egyptian name. They controlled all of the area of Mesopotamia which included Sudia Arabia, Asia Minor, Africa, Nubia, Ethiopia, Libya, parts of Turkey, Russia, and specificly the Persian Gulf and the Sinai penninsula. Here is The Sumerian King List which lists Dumuzid, "the Shepherd", as the fifth king on the pre-dynastic list.

The apparent discrepancy in the bible has a reason: We believe it has to do with the incident of the Tower of Babel (at Babylon), which the Old Testament records in no small detail. It was an incident, we believe, that had to do with Marduk’s insistence that he, rather than Nannar, should possess Sumer’s next capital, unnamed in the Sumerian text but clearly Babylon, the new capitol.

The time was during the resettlement of the plain of Sumer (the biblical Shin’ar), when new urban centers were being built: "And as they traveled from the east, they found a valley in the Land of Shin’ar and settled there. Genesis 11:2. And they said unto one another: “Let us make bricks, and burn them by fire”; and the brick served them as stone and the bitumen served them as mortar.

Historical evidence from the Sumerian texts suggests that Enlil called in all the foreign fighters he could find to destroy the tower and the rule of Nimrod, because as we might guess Nimrod favored the gods Marduk and Enki. Allot of the fighters stayed in the land and the languages they brought with them remained. Nimrod's revolt was therefore against the rule of Enlil/Yahweh.

The Comparison: A Sumerian tablet (seen below) shows Eve girdled in a garment around her loins while Adam is still naked because Eve is given knowledge first. "Garments" were "Knowledge!"

Jasher 7:30-30. And the garments of skin which God made for Adam and his wife, when they went out of the garden, were given to Seth.

For after the death of Adam and his wife, the garments were given to Enoch, the son of Jared, and when Enoch was taken up to God, he gave them to Methuselah, his son.

And at the death of Methuselah, Noah took them and brought them to the ark, and they were with him until he went out of the ark.

And in their going out, Ham stole those garments from Noah his father, and he took them and hid them from his brothers.

And when Ham begat his first born Cush, he gave him the garments in secret, and they were with Cush many days.

And Cush also concealed them from his sons and brothers, and when Cush had begotten Nimrod, he gave him those garments through his love for him, and Nimrod grew up, and when he was twenty years old he put on those garments.

Jasher 30-32; And Nimrod became strong when he put on the garments, and God (Enki) gave him might and strength, and he was a mighty hunter in the earth, yea, he was a mighty hunter in the field, and he hunted the animals and he built altars, and he offered upon them the animals before the Lord.

And Nimrod strengthened himself, and he rose up from amongst his brethren, and he fought the battles of his brethren against all their enemies round about.

And the Lord (Enki) delivered all the enemies of his brethren in his hands, and God prospered him from time to time in his battles, and he reigned upon earth.

And when Nimrod was forty years old, at that time there was a war between his brethren and the children of Japheth, so that they were in the power of their enemies. Jasher 7:34.

Jasher 7:35-37. And Nimrod went forth at that time, and he assembled all the sons of Cush and their families, about four hundred and sixty men, and he hired also from some of his friends and acquaintances about eighty men, and be gave them their hire, and he went with them to battle, and when he was on the road, Nimrod strengthened the hearts of the people that went with him.

And he said to them, Do not fear, neither be alarmed, for all our enemies will be delivered into our hands, and you may do with them as you please.

And all the men that went were about five hundred, and they fought against their enemies, and they destroyed them, and subdued them, and Nimrod placed standing officers over them in their respective places.

Book of Jasher 7:45. And all nations and tongues heard of his fame, and they gathered themselves to him, and they bowed down to the earth, and they brought him offerings, and he became their lord and king, and they all dwelt with him in the city at Shinar, and Nimrod reigned in the earth over all the sons of Noah, and they were all under his power and counsel.

And when Nimrod had joyfully returned from battle, after having conquered his enemies, all his brethren, together with those who knew him before, assembled to make him king over them, and they placed the regal crown upon his head.

And he set over his subjects and people, princes, judges, and rulers, as is the custom amongst kings.

And then (Enlil) placed Terah the son of Nahor the prince of his host, and he dignified him and elevated him above all his princes. see Book of Jasher 7 At verse 46 Jasher turns Nimrod into an evil ruler 'who did not go in the ways of the Lord' (Enlil). But we see the end result, as verified in Josephus above because biblical writers eliminated One of the Gods - Enki...... Enlil is "The Lord!"..The Owner of the land and the people!

So we have 'garment's' stolen from Noah by Ham, passed down and concealed by Nimrod. AND we have A GOD who is with him and 'helps him upon the Earth'. The 'garments' of skin must have been some sort of Kingly apparatus designed to grant the bearer power and rulership. Apparently men were only spiritual beings until God (Enki) gave them a 'clothing of skin'. This is repeated in the Lost books of Adam and Eve, The Cave of Treasures And Adam and Eve were in Paradise, and clothed with glory and shining with praise for three hours.

In the gnostic The Apocalypse of Adam, Adam warns his sons against the 'false powers' of the Earth'. He sees men he does not recognize but concludes they are angels sent from God. He attributes his knowledge to Eve, who taught him about the True God. He than says,"Then God, the ruler of the aeons and the powers, divided us in wrath....meaning another god made him obedient and fearful - so he tells his sons they must 'obey' this 'ruler of the Earth'.(Enlil)

This is from A misinformed christain. Their comment is this; "These tablets may have a reaction, or twisted version, in their accounts of the Creation and Flood."
Twisted? Hardley!

"Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the LORD and against his Anointed One. "Let us break their chains," they say, "and throw off their fetters." The One enthroned in heaven laughs, the Lord scoffs at them. Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, "I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill." I will proclaim the decree of the LORD: He said to me, "you are my Son, today I have become your Father, Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery."

Once again the word "US" appears in the text indicating Gods, More than one!. The writer again ignores this. The 'Kings of the Earth' were appointed by Enki. The Lord of Hosts is ENLIL. Enlil controls the Earth! Enlil anointed Cain or 'Sin' not Nimrod. The meaning of 'Nimrod' then is "The Rebel." Their comment; "Thus "Nimrod" may not be the character's name at all. It is more likely a derisive term of a type, a representative, of a system that is epitomized in rebellion against the Creator," the one thought to be the true God. Rebellion began soon after the Flood as civilizations were restored.... Once again indicating that the 'creator' is not the true god! Since Nimrod had the 'garments', he knew the difference.

From the texts; "Therefore, you kings, be wise; he warned, you rulers of the earth. Serve the LORD with FEAR and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him."

More proof...Nimrod's name is from the verb "let us revolt." He is said to be a 'mighty hunter' (king)(gibbor tsayidh) in the sight of the Lord, but the language actually has a different meaning than what we've been taught. He becomes a tyrant or despot leading an organized rebellion against the rule of Yahweh/Enlil. He hunts not animals, but rather the souls of men.
from.. The Tower of Babel
That should clarify what we said about Yahweh/Enlil being a cruel false God.

The name of YHVH rarely appears in extra-Biblical literature in the Ancient Near East. Therefore we would not expect to find it in the Gilgamesh epic. But why should the God of the Jews rarely be mentioned? The Hebrew Bible is replete with the names of other gods.

On the other hand, the nations surely knew of Him even though they had no respect for Him. If so, how might His Name appear in their literature, if at all? The name of YHVH, in a culture which is in rebellion against His rule, would most likely be in a derisive form, not in its true form. Likewise, the writers of Scripture would deride the rebels.

The Gilgamesh Epic describes the first "God is Dead" movement. In the Epic, the hero is a vile, filthy, perverted person, yet he is presented as the greatest, strongest, hero that ever lived. (Heidel 1963: 18). "So that the one who sent the Flood will not trouble them anymore, Gilgamesh sets out to kill the perpetrator." He takes with him a friend who is a monstrous half-man, half-animal -- Enkidu. Together they go on a long journey to the Cedar Mountain to find and destroy the monster who sent the Flood. Gilgamesh finds him and finally succeeds in cutting off the head of the creature whose name is "Huwawa" ("Humbaba" in the Assyrian version; see Heidel 1963: 34ff).

Is there a connection with the Gilgamesh epic and Genesis 10? Note what Gilgamesh says to Enkidu, the half-man, half-beast, who accompanied him on his journey, found in Tablet 111, lines 147 - 150.

"If I fall," Gilgamesh says, "I will establish a name for myself. 'Gilgamesh is fallen,' they will say, 'in combat with terrible Huwawa.'"

But the next five lines are missing from all tablets found so far! Can we speculate on what they say? Let's try . . . We suggest that those five lines include, "But if I win,.. they will say, Gilgamesh, the mighty vanquisher of Huwawa!"

Why do we say that? Because Genesis 10:9 gives us the portion missing from the Gilgamesh tablets. Those lines include... "it is said, Nimrod the mighty vanquisher of YHVH." This has to be what is missing from all the clay tablets of the Gilgamesh story. The Gilgamesh Epic calls him Huwawa; the Bible calls Him YHVH.

This face supposedly represents Huwawa who, according to the Gilgamesh's Epic, sent the Flood on the earth. According to the story, Huwawa (Humbaba in the Assyrian version) was killed by Gilgamesh and his half-man/half-beast friend, Enkidu. The author suggests Huwawa is the ancient pagan perspective of Yahweh (YHVH), the God of the Bible. About 3 inches (7.5 cm), this mask is dated to around the sixth century BC. Of an unknown provenance, it is now in the British Museum.

All we can conclude from them (the lost lines) is that Gilgamesh and Enkidu cut off the head of Humbaba (or Huwawa) and that the expedition had a successful issue (ending) (1963: 47).

Are the missing lines from the Epic are right there in the Bible?

This is also explained in the Nag Hammidi scrolls which church leaders want you to think are false and heretical. The tablets and the scrolls were found in two separate places, written at different times by different people so this is not a coincidence. The Dead Sea Scrolls, parts of which are still missing are also thought to contain verification of the subjects we find in these two works. A Catholic Bishop in France has them and he won't let anybody see them.... Ask yourself Why? Check out this link to the 'Missing" Dead Sea Scrolls

In the Nag Hammidi scrolls Adam describes "the god who created us" to his son Seth. And he says,"And we served him in FEAR and SLAVERY"..The only known text written by Noah is included in the texts of Enoch's Books. The text indicates a false god, who - even after the flood leads men astray. The only discernible difference in these two texts are the names of the 'Gods'. We copied parts of the Nag Hammidi text that relate to this to prove our point. You will see the connection and the links to the library on our 'Passage' series.

Tablet I continues with legends about overpopulation and plagues. Atrahasis (Noah) is mentioned at the end of Tablet I.

Tablet II begins with more overpopulation of humans and the god Enlil sending first famine and drought at formulaic intervals of 1200 years to reduce the population. In this epic Enlil is depicted as a nasty capricious god while Enki is depicted as a kind helpful god, perhaps because priests of Enki were writing and copying the story. Tablet II is mostly damaged, but ends with Enlil's decision to destroy mankind with a flood and Enki bound by an oath was to keep the plan secret.

"Let the Earthlings by hunger and pestilence perish," decreed Enlil. To speed the demise of the Earthlings, Enlil specifically ordered Enki to block Earthlings’ access to ocean fish.

Covertly, however, Enki fed Earthlings from his corn stores, trained them in sea fishing and gave them access to the sea. When Enlil accused Enki of defying his decree that humans be allowed to perish, Enki lied. He said the humans acted without his knowledge. Frustrated, Enlil planned for the final destruction of Earthlings and the end to Nibiran occupation of Earth [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki: 206; 1978, The 12th Planet, pages 292 -294].

The sentence quoted above from Atra Hasis III iv, lines 6-7: "Like dragonflies they have filled the river, " was changed in Gilgamesh XI line 123 to: "Like the spawn of fishes, they fill the sea." We can see the myth-maker's hand at work here, changing a local river flood into an ocean deluge...but is it myth?

Each 3,600 year revolution of Nibiru to the region of Solaris created ever more violent disturbances on Nibiru, the Sun (huge solar flares) Mars (Lahmu) and Earth. Enki’s son Nergal reported from the south tip of Africa that the Antarctic ice sheet was sliding into the ocean and would, on next approach of Nibiru, slide into the sea and cause wave reverberations that would engulf most of Earth.

Tablet III of Atrahasis tells how the god Enki warns the hero Ziusudra, Atra Hasis or Utnapishtim (Noah) ("Extremely Wise") of Shuruppak, speaking through a reed wall (suggestive of an oracle) to dismantle his house (perhaps to provide a construction site) and build a boat to escape the flood planned by the god Enlil to destroy mankind. "He opened the water clock and filed it; the coming of the flood on the seventh night he marked off for him."
The 'Serpent' God is Galza and behind the screen to the right is Noah. Enki also tells Noah "to stop worshipping the Gods." We also see this in Genesis

Galzu tells Enki (depicted with his snake icon) to warn Ziasudra.

From Enki's Lost Books; (touching the "wall"--probably a computer bank, depicted with Xs across the screens and slots for programs) of the Flood. Galzu guides Enki’s arm to convey tablet (possibly a computer or holo disk. The disk is shown leaving Enki’s hand en route to Ziasudra’s computer) [Drawing from Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki: page 194, but interpretation mine.] Sasha Lessin, Ph. D. We note that Dr. Lessin uses the description of the Enki stories as 'fictionalized history'. That might be true if it weren't for the discovery of the Planet they came from..
see Forbidden Knowledge

13,000 years ago, around 10,900 B.C. E., "in the Whiteland, at the Earth's bottom, off its foundation, the [Antarctic] icesheet slipped. By Nibiru's netforce it was pulled into the south sea. A tidal wave arose, northward spreading."

We are taught from childhood that Faith is a positive trait, but it is not. Faith inherently assumes that we should accept something that may or may not be true. Then, it will become "true" through Faith. It will not. We may be lucky (or make a fortuitous guess) but Verification, not Faith, is what deserves our trust.

So we ask you to consider the Greeks and the Romans who each had 'different' gods. The Egyptians had 'many' gods. Then we have the people of Persia, Iran, Syria and Iraq who also had 'a different god' than the Romans and Greeks. The distinctions as we see began in Babylonia but were deleted by copysts because we were threatened by a god who demands total submission only to him. But we have Abraham who "worshiped the God of his Fathers"...Abraham as we see, is important in Islam as well as Christianity. Abraham's journey began in Babylon in the city of Ur. He was told to leave by his god....Since we still find ourselves on opposite sides of a religious fence, what is the name of his god?

Important clues

From the Hebrew Torah; Genesis 1:1 BEREISHIT bara Elokim et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz. translated - IN THE BEGINNING God created the Heavens and the earth.

Each and every mention of GOD uses the word 'Elokim'.
Versue 1:26 has the very same wording we mentioned as the most important question - Who is US? "Let US make man (men) in OUR image, as OUR likeness." Who is US?

But on the first page of the Torah we also find a god called HASHEM. Genesis 1:27 HASHEM God then formed the man.
Genesis 2:4 Eleh toledot hashamayim veha'aretz behibare'am beyom asot HASHEM Elokim eretz veshamayim. - translated - This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, on the day when HASHEM God made earth and heaven.

Verses 1 - 6 do not use this term 'HASHEM'. There seems to be no mistake that there is another God here who takes pity on Adam and Eve and warns Noah of the coming flood. In The Keys of Enoch - Enoch uses the term "Elohim Masters"- and "Watchers", more than one.

Then we have the verse below which uses the name 'HASHEM' only in the first part of the verse. When the word 'Elokim' appears the second time by it's self - it makes a strong case for the verification that there are two Gods.

3:1 Vehanachash hayah arum mikol chayat hasadeh asher asah HASHEM Elokim vayomer el-ha'ishah af ki-amar Elokim lo tochelu mikol etz hagan. - translated - The serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which HASHEM God made; and it said to the woman, "Did God even say that you should not eat from all the trees of the Garden?"

The serpent here is speaking in the 3rd person. This is only in the The Jahwist text; (Two different versions of the Torah) both in the tale of Adam and Eve, and also in the episode of the Ass of Balaam, neither of which appear in the The Elohist text. The Jahwist is the only source involving talking animals.

This is pure fantasy ...snakes can't talk!
Without any cognitive thought what-so-ever, we have excepted this as fact! No one has ever had the 'guts' to challange this illogical suggestion. Why, because we have trusted our church leaders not to deceive us! No where else in the bible do we find a 'talking creature' so why do we accept it here? The point is - the serpent is an ancient allegorical symbol. It is not a creature at all! Besides, 'serpent' is another word for 'Dragon' or 'wisdom' and it doesn't have anything to do with a devil or a 'Satan'. There is no such word as 'Satan' in any of the Old Testament writings. The problem lies in the 'literal' translation of texts that are hundreds if not thousands of years old. They meant something very different when they were written..

Another interesting point here is that HASHEM is asking the woman if 'Elokim' told them not to eat the fruit. He is directly referring to another god or an 'equal'.

In the Latin Vulgate bible - Genesis 3:35 we find this; "For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil"....GOD'S! King James - Genesis 3:22. "Eyes being opened" is yet another medifore for learning, knowing. This is exactly what happened. Their eyes were opened!

The oldest story in the world

The Two Gods in the Sumarian text

Although the original Sumerian text of the tale has not yet been found, a number of Sumerian depictions of the event were indeed discovered. They show different aspects of the tale: the Tree of Life; the offering of the forbidden fruit; the angry encounter that ensued between the “Lord God” and the “Serpent.” Yet another shows Eve girdled in a garment around her loins while Adam is still naked (below), another detail related in the Bible.

While the Serpent God features in all these ancient depictions, the illustration reproduced here is of particular significance as it writes out, in archaic Sumerian the god’s epithet/name as ~ The “star” spells “god” and the triangular symbol reads BUR, BURU. or BUZUR-all terms that make the epithet/name mean “God Who Solves Secrets,” “God of the Deep Mines,” and variations thereof. The Bible (in the original Hebrew) calls the god who tempted Eve Nahash, translated “Serpent,” but literally meaning “He Who Solves Secrets” and “He Who Knows Metals,” the exact parallels of the god’s name in the Sumerian depiction. This depiction is of further interest because it shows the Serpent God with his hands and feet in tethers, suggesting that ('HASHEM') was arrested after his unauthorized deed.

Humans were susposed to be slaves of the Gods. After their creation they were susposed to remain illiterate and dumb like animals. The Serpent God took it upon himself to change that and he did or you wouldn't be reading this right now!

In the background of the depiction there is another bearded and clothed deity wearing a multi-horned crown and there is a domesticated cat. 'Serpents' are being offered to Eve. This serpent is a symbol of wisdom or knowledge. What is Adam offering Eve? That's right - The Tree of Life! Apparently HASHEM was arrested before the tree could be given to Eve. The bible relates that god put flaming swords around the tree so Adam and Eve could not partake of it. The 'Tree of Life' is highly significant in the story of mankind. You will see it portrayed in all the ancient depictions of the 'Gods' including the Sumerian texts. It is also the main ingredient used in the Hebrew Kaballah. So why did god want to keep them from it? The bible states, the reason is 'that they may live forever'. This privilege was only for the Gods! This will be important as you continue.

But the most important thing you see here is that the 'serpent' then becomes a GOD - a supreme deity. The 'literalist' translation of the word 'serpent' therefore is incorrect and there is No satan!
Source Laurence Gardner Genesis of the Grail Kings
If you have read the book, there are verses in the Sumerian Texts that say that Enki was Cain and Abel's Father. We show you more about Cain on forbidden f2. This proves that KA.IN isn't Adam (Adapta's) and Eve's Son.

The Nag Hammidi scrolls agree with this. They relate that Eve or Sophia could turn herself into a plant or a tree. When the rebel gods decided to defile her she escaped by turning into a tree. The fallen angels then defiled an 'image' of her. The image was known as lillith. see Origin of the World. " Now come, let us lay hold of her and cast her seed into her, so that when she becomes soiled she may not be able to ascend into her light. Rather, those whom she bears will be under our charge. But let us not tell Adam, for he is not one of us. Rather let us bring a deep sleep over him. And let us instruct him in his sleep to the effect that she came from his rib, in order that his wife may obey, and he may be lord over her." "First she was pregnant with Abel, by the first ruler. And it was by the seven authorities and their angels that she bore the other offspring".

The Enuma Elish tablets relate that Eve or NIN.HAR.SAG / Hat-Hor, (House of Horus), Isis bore 7 sets of twins. These were the 7 Races of the Earth at the time.

The texts relate; Enki's tablet asked that Anu deny Adapa immortality. Return him instead to Earth. "On Earth, Adapa (Adam) would breed a more intelligent servant race, the AdaPites, the Civilized Humans, better for Nibiran needs, better able to serve the Lords than the AdaMite Hybrids. The Adapites, descended from the earlier Hybrid, Adamu, had more Homo-Erectus genes than Adapa.

"In the cultic practices, humans fulfilled their destiny: to take care of the gods' material needs. They therefore provided the gods with houses (the temples) that were richly supplied with lands, which people cultivated for them.

The tablet confessed Enki'd mated with Hybrid Earthlings, Adamites, descended from Adamu and Ti-Amat. These Adamite lasses bore Adapa and Titi.

Adapa left behind the descendants of thirty sons and thirty daughters he and Titi begat. The Nibiran colonists divided these genetic descendants of Enki among themselves as proteges and taught them writing, mathematics, well-digging, body oil preparation, harp and flute mastery and the preparation of elixir of the Inbu fruits. These educated hybrids identified with their respective Nibiran teachers.

Nibirans taught Adapa's descendants to use bitumens for furnaces for gold smelting and refining.

Enlil's son, Nannar, taught the Adapite Hybrids ceremonies to worship their Nibiran lords. "Of the rites of worship of the Anunnaki [Those who from Sky Descended, i.e., Nibirans] that the beginning was."

This is the proof we were created by "God'! There was NO evolution from apes!

The other thing that stood out in this text is that Abel was supervised by Marduk in animal husbantry. KA.IN (Cain) was supervised by Enlil's son Ninurta in farming and growing grain. A jealously erupted when Cains sacriface was rejected by 'God'. The twins fought all winter until KA.IN killed Abel with a stone. "When summer began, it was not raining, the meadows were dry, the pastures dwindled. Into the fields of his brother Abael his flocks drove, from the furrows and canals to drink water. By this Ka-in was angered."

Cains punishment: "For your sin of your birthright you are deprived, but of your seed seven nations will come. In a realm set apart they shall thrive, distant lands they shall inhabit. But having your brother with a stone killed, by a stone will be your end."

Ninurta returned Ka-in to the wilds east of Edin where "in a distant realm Ka-in had sons and daughters" Ninurta, "for them a city built, and as he was building, by a falling stone was he [Ka-in] killed." (Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men page 112] suggests this might have been a murder rather than accident.)

LAND BEYOND THE SEA: The Americas; settled by Ka-in's descendents (CAIN); overseen by Ninurtu, son of ENLIL. INCIDENTALLY, within the EARTH CHRONICLES, Sitchin makes the observation that the 'MARK OF CAIN' may well have been the genetic "decoding" of the gene for facial hair...so they could easily be recognized as a people; if you invert KA-IN...you get IN-CA or people without facial hair! cf. see Sitchin's "THE LOST REALMS" for details on Cain

So why is the Serpent God Enki literally transformed into a deity called Satan?

There is no Satan, There is No devil!
But there is a deity that considers himself the judge of humankind. We mentioned the newly published Gospel of Judas on the previous page. We said there was a sentence that was significant. quote; The disciples were saying a prayer of thanksgiving and Jesus laughed at them. That sentence spoken by Jesus being; " He answered and said to them, I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god will be praised." unquote "Your god"? There can be no clearer verification that there are two Gods!

The sinister satanic figure (sometimes called Lucifer, Beelzebub or Belial-meaning ‘worthless’) emerged mainly through the onset of Christian Dualism- the concept of two opposing and equally powerful gods.’ According to different traditions, Satan was either the brother or the son of Jehovah, or was even the competitive and aggressive aspect of Jehovah himself, in essence, the Jehovah-Satan conflict was representative of the ancient pre-Christian tradition of the symbolic battle between Light and Darkness as perceived by the Persian mystics. This tradition found its way into the ascetic Judaism of sects such as the Essenes of Qumrân, and it is to some extent recognizable in the New Testament, but it was not apparent in the Hebrew lore of the Old Testament wherein satans or demons are seen to perform specific duties of mundane opposition.

So, from what original concept or Bible entry was the modern Christian image of Satan born? In the Old Testament book of Isaiah is a section dealing with the prophesied fall of Babylon, and in referring to the city and its despotic king, Isaiah says, ‘How are you fallen from heaven, day star, son of the dawn! How are you fallen to earth, conqueror of nations!’ (Isaiah 14:12). Many centuries after this was written, the image of the fallen day star (Venus) was redefined as ‘light-bearer’, and when translated into Latin with a proper noun connotation it became Lucifer. Hence, Lucifer appeared in this Venus context in St. Jerome’s 4th-century Vulgate Bible, to become associated with an evil Satan some 1400 years later in John Milton’s Paradise Lost:
Of Lucifer, so by allusion called,
Of that bright star to Satan paragon’d.

Today, the Isaiah verse in authorized Christian Bibles retains the Latinized entry which emanated from the Christian Church's creation of its own Satan mythology during Roman Imperial times. The Roman faith was based wholly on subjugating people at large to the domination of the bishops, and to facilitate this subordination an anti-God/anti-Christ figure was necessary as a perceived enemy. This enemy was Satan, the evil one who would claim the souls of any who did not offer absolute obedience to the Church.

For this scheme of trepidation to succeed, it was imperative for people to believe that the diabolical Satan had existed from the beginning time, and there was no earlier story with which he could be associated than that of Adam and Eve. The only problem was that Genesis made no mention whatever of Satan-but there was, of course, the inherent account of Eve and the wise serpent. The Serpent Lord was Enki, but in parts of Chaldea he had been called Shaitan, and so it was determined that the story could be rewritten to suit the desired purpose. The original text was, after a Jewish version and Christianity had become quite divorced from Judaism, even from the Westernized Judaism of Jesus.

In those days there was no understandable translation of the Bible available to Christians at large. The Jews had their Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek versions of the Old Testament, while the primary Christian Bible existed in an obscure form of Church Latin, as translated by St. Jerome in the 4th century. Outside the immediate Roman Church of the West, there were enthusiastic Eastern Christian branches in places such as Syria, Egypt and Ethiopia, and it was mainly from these regions (where the Jewish Competition was stronger) that the new Genesis accounts emerged for the Christian market.

Among these was an Egyptian and Ethiopic work called The Book of Adam and Eve, subtitled The Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan, which was produced sometime in or after the 6th century AD. This lengthy book not only features Satan as a central character, but even goes so far as to say that the cross of Jesus was erected on the very spot where Adam was buried!

A Syriac work entitled The Book of the Cave of Treasures (M’drath gaze’) is a compendium of earthly history from the creation of the World to the crucifixion of Jesus. It appears to have been compiled in the 4th century AD, but the oldest extant edition comes from the late 6th century. Once again, this book introduces Satan as the constant protagonist of evil, setting the scene for the dark and sinister element that flourishes in the Church-promoted Gothic tradition that evolved during the brutal Catholic inquisition. The book even maintains that orthodox Christinity was in place before the time of Adam and Eve and the emergent Hebrews.
Laurence Gardner Genesis of the Grail Kings

The Sumerian version relates that in his anger Enlil (Elokim) (the God in Genesis) ordered the expulsion of The Adam - the Homo sapiens - Earthling - from the E.DIN (“The Abode of the Righteous Ones”). No longer confined to the settlements of the Anunnaki, (the gods) Man began to roam the Earth.

So what was the unauthorized deed? - We think you know.
Something else here should now be quite clear - The serpent is not Satan, but is a God that loves humans and wants to protect them. How do we know this?
Because the Serpent God Enki did not lie to Eve! He did not trick her! The verse says, "The eyes of both of them were opened", a medifore for 'knowing', learning, self realization (Genesis 3:7). They became "One of US!"...and they did NOT DIE as threatened by the 'one' god in Genesis.

In the Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, the parents of the human race, Genesis gives two versions of their creation. In the first, God creates "male and female in his own image" on the sixth day. In the second, Adam is placed in the Garden of Eden, and Eve is later created from his rib to ease his loneliness. One of these versions is incorrect. Can you tell which one it is? The correct version is revealed in the Nag Hammidi texts.

The kind, loving God in the Sumerian text, Enki wants humans to be like the gods. His first and most important deed was 'giving them knowledge'. But who took the credit for the creation of mankind? - Obviously the second god mentioned in the Hebrew Genesis because God makes a man in Genesis 1:27...so why does God make him again in Genesis 2:7? - "breathing the breath of life into it."... and note the first mentioned verse refers to "US" (1:26) So who is 'US'? - Now You Know!...However only the God in verse 2:7 had the ability or knowledge to 'breath life' into Adam. Another distinction is that verse 1:27 uses the term 'Lord God'..the verse 2:7 only uses the word God. The 'Lord' god gives the warning not to eat the fruit. Remember 'Lord' means 'owner'. see Psalm 82 above - "You too are gods, sons of El Elyon, all of you".

The Nag Hammidi texts have a similar explaination: The un-named, un-seen Creator invisions a mate and She appears. She then is also His daughter because She is created first. This creation is from the emotions of love, kindness, joy, forgiveness and all the beauty of the creative force. Sophia is the only one who can see her Father. In the texts a Son is born to Sophia and the Un-named creator 'from a spark of light that resembles blessedness'. This Son is the only one created of "Pure Light". Sophia then has a daughter. Her name is Eve or Zoe. In her myriad of emotions, Sophia desires to understand and know her Father. In Her desire to know Him, her extreme emotions produce a demiruge (another son). The demiruge is an imperfect copy of the creator; a product of fear and grief. This deity embodies all other negative emotions including hate and jealousy. Because he is imperfect, he cannot see the un-named Father and he is jealous of the Son of Pure Light.

In his egotistical attempt to prove he is the only God, he creates three Adams, but none of them have 'life'. Sophia intervenes and breathes life into one of the Adams (which means 'man'). Sophia then sends Eve to teach him about the un-named Father. As you might guess, Yaldabaoth (the demiruge) is jealous of and hates the 'man'. Yalabaoth is a 'material' deity. He controls what can be seen and touched including men. He alone is the creator of 'death'.

The Son of 'Pure Light' is the Christ and he makes it possible from the beginning that humans have eternal life...taken from The Apocryphon of John in the Nag Hammidi library. This then translates to "The Tree of Life" from which we are all given "Eternal Life" by the Son!
More of this is on our 'God's Wife' page and a secret page where we explain what our soul really is...A gift from God.

In the Sumerian texts; "Thereafter the Primitive Workers performed the manual tasks in both Lands: In the Land of the Mines they "bore the work and suffered the toil"; in Mesopotamia, "with picks and spades they built gods' houses, they built the big canal banks; food they grew for the sustenance of the gods." Many ancient drawings engraved on cylinder seals depicted these Primitive Workers performing their tasks, naked as the animals of the field." Various Sumerian texts recorded this animal-like stage in human development. As we see there are two Gods seated here.

Forbiddenk1 reveals the very first primitive workers as does this web site...They were not human and the DNA does not match.
Ancient Skull

What the Bible is hidding, right before your eyes.

We continue our focus here on the verse in Genesis beginning at 2:16-17, which we have already touched on above. We invite you to get out your King James bible and read along.

"And God said, You may not eat from the tree of Knowledge or Conscious - for its fruit will open your eyes to make you aware of right and wrong, good and bad.
If you eat its fruit, you will die."
The Living Bible - 1971

Why was eating from the tree of knowledge considered bad
and why was an interpretation made that God would kill Adam and Eve for eating of it?
What is Conscious?

There was no real reason for this idle threat. And it is just that - A THREAT!....Nothing in the bible says that the tree of knowledge was bad! Nothing in the bible says that God will kill them! God just said, 'Don't eat of it'!.. but why?...

The ultimate reason was that the church did not want anyone to be educated because they would discover the church's secret. Keeping men and women ignorant kept them under control just as Enlil wanted complete control of the 'Earthlings'.

Keep reading .... We find that NO ONE died!
Get your bible out, read it again. Adam and Eve did NOT DIE!

As we read in Genesis 3: 4 - 5, as positive reinforcement, the serpent says, .. "You will NOT surely die!" "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil".
Apparently this was true.... because No One died!
Genesis 3:7 "Then the eyes of both of them were opened".

Man is the only creature in the vast universe who asks questions and, with a sirit of inquiry, wants to know. He is a questing as well as questioning spirit, and like Ulysses of old: "strong in will to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield". Inquiry and curiosity are the great dynamics of all research and discovery. "What endless questions vex the thought of Whence, and Whither, When and How?"

So the only 'projected evil' or so-called sin, is a clergyman's interpertation of the verse you just read, because God did NOT kill Adam or Eve!

The serpent, blamed for the temptation of Eve is not a serpent at all. Again the 'serpent' is a medifore, a symbol. It is NOT SATAN! Where do you see the word 'Satan?'..

Temptation? Origional sin? Hardley! Genesis 3:5 - The verse spoken by the serpent becomes an actual fact. You could say, he spoke the truth because their eyes were opened and they did not die.
Therefore, the Serpent did not deceive Eve, he did not 'trick her', he told the truth.

"US" This is not a 'typo'. It is not a mistake in printing. It says, "US"! Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

'US!' are sons of the God we see in the first part of Genesis but the leader of 'US' is also called Elohm, El, and Enlil. His cohorts are called Watchers and guardians!