The Sumerian stories date back thousands of years and were probably associated with the Earth
in it's primordial watery chaos state. In time Anshar and his sister produced a son
to reign over all; this son was Anu. Anu's consorts were his sisters Antu, Lady of
the Sky (also called Nammu), and Ki, the Earth Mother (also named Urash). As well as
having their origional Sumerian names, the Anunnaki also became known for their
alternative Semitic names as used in Akkad and later Babylonia.
Modern Science, the use of mathmetics,
and medicine and what we call astrology are the 'Keys' to some of these forbidden secrets.
But there are more secrets to be found...and we will. One of these is
anti-gravity and another is the teleportation of particles from one place to
another. .. Otherwise called "Beem me up Scottie", the research is continuing as
you read, by NASA and the Pentagon. IBM started this research 10 years ago.
When we find all the secrets, we will have found God.
One of the Mesopotamian versions of the events leading to the Deluge is the
text known (by its opening words) “When the gods like men” in which the hero
of the Deluge is called Atra-Hasis (“He who is exceedingly wise”). The tale relates
how Anu, the ruler of Nibiru, returned to that planet from a visit to Earth after
arranging a division of powers and territories on Earth between his feuding sons,
the half brothers Enlil (“Lord of the Command”) and Enki (“Lord of Earth”), putting
Enki in charge of the gold- mining operations in Africa. After describing the hard
work of the Anunnaki assigned to the mines, their mutiny, and the ensuing creation
through genetic engineering by Enki and his half sister Ninharsag of the Adamu,
a "Pnmitive Worker,” the epic relates how Mankind began to procreate and multiply.
In time, Mankind began to upset Enlil by its excessive “conjugations,” especially
with the Anunnaki/Nephilim (a situation reflected in the biblical version of the Deluge tale);
and Enlil prevailed on the Great Anunnaki, in their Council, to use the foreseen
catastrophe of the avalanche of water to wipe Mankind off the face of the Earth.
This was to be caused by astroids which were already on their way to Earth -
and which the Anunnaki could not stop. Enoch's books confirm this saying there
were '8 mountains' on their way from Heaven.
The Sumerian texts also say that Enlil now saw his chance to get rid of the Earthlings
when the scientific station at the tip of Africa began to report a dangerous situation;
the growing ice cap over Antartica had become unstable, resting upon a layer of
slippery slush. The problem was that this instability had developed just as Nibiru
was about to make its approach to Earth's vicinity; and Nibiru's gravitational pull
could upset the ice cap's balance and cause it to slip into the Antarctic Ocean.
The immence tidal waves that this would cause could engulf the whole globe.
When the Igigi orbiting Earth confirmed the certanity of such a catastrophe,
the Anunnaki began to assemble in Sippar, at the spaceport, Enlil, however, insisted
that mankind be kept unaware of the coming Deluge; and at a special session of the
Assembly of the Gods, he made all of them, and especially Enki, swear to keep
But Enki, though he joined in swearing to keep the decision a secret from
Mankind, was not happy with the decision and sought ways to frustrate it. He
chose to achieve that through the intermediary of Atra-Hasis, a son of Enki by a
human mother. The text, which at times assumes a biographical style by Atra-Hasis
himself, quotes him saying, “I am Atra-Hasis; I lived in the temple of Enki my lord”-
a statement which clearly establishes the existence of a temple in those remote
pre-Diluvial times. This city was Eridu or as we know it, Enoch.
Describing the worsening climatic conditions on the one hand and Enlil’s harsh measures
against Mankind on the other hand in the period preceding the Deluge, the text
quotes Enki’s advice to the people through Atra-Hasis (Noah) how to protest against
Enlil’s decrees: the worship of the gods should stop!
“Enki opened his mouth and addressed his servant,”
saying thus to him:
As the situation got worse and the catastrophe day neared, Atra-Hasis persisted
in his intercession with his god Enki. “In the temple of his god.. . he set foot. . . every day
he wept, bringing oblations in the morning.” Seeking Enki’s help to avert Mankind’s
demise, “he called by the name of his god’ ‘-words that employ the same terminology
as in the above-quoted verse from the Bible. In the end Enki decided to subvert the
decision of the Council of the Anunnaki by summoning Atra-Hasis to the temple and
speaking to him from behind a screen. The event was commemorated on a Sumerian
cylinder seal, showing Enki (as the Serpent God) revealing the secret of the Deluge
to Atra-Hasis. Giving him instructions for the building of a submersible boat
that would withstand the avalanche of water, Enki advised Atra-Hasis to lose no time,
for he had only seven days left before the catastrophe happened. To make sure
Atra-Hasis wasted no time, Enki put into motion a clocklike device.
The elders, on a sign, summon to the House of Council. Let heralds proclaim a
command loudly throughout the land:
Do not reverence your gods, do not pray to your goddesses.
He opened the water clock and filled it;
the coming of the flood on the seventh night he marked off for him.
On the forbiddenk1 page of this series, we showed the origional Sumerian text where
Enki told Noah, to take the seed of every living creature. This was not a boat full of
live animals, but a boat containing their DNA. The texts also relate that every one who
aided Noah in building the boat were allowed to go along with him and his family.
The only live animals Noah took were a few goats for milk, chickens for eggs, ect.
Even unto millennia later, in Assyrian times, the saying “Wise as Adapa”
meant that someone was exceedingly wise and knowledgeable. The study of sciences
was often referred to in Mesopotamian texts as Shunnat apkali Adapa, “recital/repetition
of the great forefather Adapa.” A letter by the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal mentioned
that his grandfather, King Sennacherib, was given great knowledge when Adapa had
appeared to him in a dream. The “wide knowledge” imparted by Enki to Adapa included
writing, medicine, and according to the astronomical series of tablets UD.SAR
.ANUM.ENLILLA (“The Great Days of Anu and Enlil”)-knowledge of
astronomy and astrology.
Though Adapa had daily attended the sanctuary of Enki, it
appears from Sumerian
texts that the first officially appointed priest - a function that then passed hereditarily from
father to son-was named EN.ME.DUR.AN.KI-’ ‘Priest of the ME’s of Duranki,” the sacred
precinct of Nippur. The texts report how the gods “showed him how to observe oil and
water, the secrets of Anu, Enlil, and Enki. They gave him the Divine Tablet, the engraved
secrets of Heaven and Earth. They taught him how to make calculations with numbers”
-the knowledge of mathematics and astronomy, and of the art of measurement,
including that of time.
Many of the Mesopotamian tablets dealing with mathematics, astronomy,
and the calendar have astounded scientists by their sophistication. At the core of
these sciences was a mathematical system called sexagesimal (“Base Sixty”) whose
advanced nature, including its celestial aspects, has already been discussed. Such
sophistication existed even in the earliest times that some call predynastic:
arithmetically inscribed tablets that have been found attest the use of the sexagesimal
system and of numerical record keeping. Designs on clay objects also from the earliest
times leave no doubt regarding the high level of knowledge of geometry in those remote times.
When Time Began - Zecharia Sitchin
Church doctrine versus
According to the bible and
most so-called 'believers', people think the Earth is only 4000 years old,
beginning at some point before Noah's flood. This time frame relates to the
city of Nippur which was begun at a point concluded to be 3760 BC. It also
referers to a point in which time was 'counted' or the beginning of the count.
This was actually the date of Anu's state visit to the city. Anu was Nibiru's King
or "The God of Those Who From Heaven to Earth Came". This was not from the creation
of the world as the Jewish people seem to think. Their year count up until 2000 would
be 5760 from the 'visit', so the assumption that this is when the world began
is completely baseless and void of fact.
To make this even more baseless, new evidence suggests Noah's flood was
in 11,400 B.C. and did not cover the whole earth. Sitchin says the flood was nearer
to 11,000 BC due to the building of the Great Pyramid, which was not by Kufu. Our
other evidence indicates that the Pyramid was built in 11,360 BC. The supervision
of this project was under the 'Mastership' of none other than Enoch, also known
as Thoth in Egypt and 'Ningishzidda' in Sumeria.
Recent findings indicate that a huge space rock hit the coast
and we know one hit the Yucatan peninsula and wiped out the dinasours -
Sixty-five million years ago, at the dividing line between the Cretaceous/Tertiary periods
- and an AMATEUR GEOLOGIST
FINDS FIRST IMPACT CRATER IN JAPANESE ALPS - TOKYO - A crater from a meteorite
impact more than 20,000 years ago has been discovered in the Japanese Alps, an amateur
geologist announced this week. The crater is the first found in this country.
Masao Sakamoto said the crater stretches 900 yards in diameter and spreads out
across rugged, heavily forested land in Nagano prefecture (state), about
100 miles west of Tokyo.
We also have evidence that the dinasours were destroyed 65,000,000 years ago
in what is described as an atomic blast sent from outer space. The crater
this blast left is on the Yucutan peninsula in South America. This impact is
described as a 6 mile wide rock approaching at 55,000 miles/hr.
On landing, it buries itself 8 miles into the ground and releases
the energy of the simultaneous detonation of 300 million Hiroshima
sized atomic bombs. This impact is most likely the one that destroyed the
huge creatures when the dirt from the impact was sent miles into space,
blocking out the sun's rays for more than a year.
Edgar Cayce's writings describe this event in detail. He says the destruction
was planned by the inhabitants of Atlantis because the giant animals were
becoming a problem.
Edgar Cayce's readings play a significant role in our theories and we
link to the readings here and on our 'Atlantis' pages.
We believe an 11,400 BC impact and the consequencal eruption
of Vesuvius might be the one the angel Raguel described to Enoch and it's
association with the destruction of the 'giant' men called Nephilim.
(see Enoch's Books)
Mr. Cayce also links this date with the building of the Great Pyramid of Gaza
so that the 'Atlantian records' would be preserved for a future generation of
men with greater knowledge and understanding.
Other scientific evidence tells us the Earth is more than 100,000,000
years old and we have the remains of humans that are more than 40,000 years old.
We also have mounds of other evidence that prove the existance of man before
what we know as 'recorded history'...so why do we still believe the 'church'
decreed age of mankind?
Most people cannot reconcile church dogma with real scientific evidence.
We clash with our own thoughts on this every day. Why is that?
Does anyone remember 'the Dark Ages'? Does anyone know where
this got started or why?
It is mostly known as the "Triumph of Christianity". But this means
one thing and one thing only, 'the CONTROL of Christianity' in the known
civilized parts of the world. It is a known fact that christian
missionaries go to every corner of the globe trying to 'christianize' all
who walk, hear or speek. They try to 'force' this on everyone they come
in contact with, calling them sinners and telling them they will
go to hell if they don't convert...FEAR and OBEY!
They are still doing it..see Airforce scandel
While Petrarch's concept of a "Dark Age" corresponded
to a mostly "Christian" period following pagan Rome, what
most users of the term label the "Dark Ages" today are those
least Christianized, when events in parts (though not all)
of Europe were dominated by the activities of pagan tribes....
in their opinion. But who were 'the pagan tribes'?
pagan tribes were people who did not agree with the church..period!
The Dark Ages (or Dark Age) is a metaphor with multiple
meanings and connotations. It is most commonly known in relation
to European history, but it is also used to denote other
periods from which events are relatively obscure because
of a lack of knowledge, with the
term "Dark" being used in a non-judgmental sense of "obscure" or "opaque". In
addition to periods in human history, "Dark" in this sense
has been applied to periods in the history of life on earth
and in the history of the cosmos, even.
The 'Lack of Knowledge',
or should we say the supression of it, is the reason for the fall into the dark ages.
The christians under St. Augustine
(5th century) were told that learning and education was
against God's laws. Pythagoras, Hipparchus and Galileo were condemed by church
decree for teaching beliefs 'outside church doctrine'. They burned every record
that they thought was connected to what they called 'sin' and called it
More specifically, as applied to European history, the term
Dark Ages was originally used to denote the 900-year period
between the fall of the western Roman Empire in the 5th
century and the revival of classical Greek and Roman
culture embodied in the Renaissance. This concept of a
"Dark Age" was first created in the early 14th Century
by the humanist Petrarch and was originally intended
as a pejorative sweeping criticism of the lack of Latin
literature. Later historians expanded the term to include
not only the lack of Latin literature, but a lack of
cultural achievements in general.
To understand how the concept of the Dark Ages
originated it is helpful to understand how the people of
the time saw their own place in history. Most scholars
in Late Antiquity followed
St. Augustine (5th century),
who believed history had six ages, and that they were
living in the sixth and final stage of history. In this
phase the end of earthly man was expected after Christ
returned to earth, and the events of Revelation and the
end of the world could happen at any time. Though the
momentarily expected immanent Second Coming faded for
Christians during the 2nd and 3rd centuries, the idea
of the world in a late age was prevalent for nearly
During this time all 'pagans' were hunted down
and killed by order of none other than the holy Roman church.
It is generally accepted that the term 'dark ages' was invented
by Petrarch in the 1330s. Writing of those who had come
before him, he said that "amidst the errors there shone
forth men of genius, no less keen were their eyes, although
they were surrounded by darkness and dense gloom"
(Petrarch, De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia)1.
Christian writers had used traditional metaphors of
"light versus darkness" to describe "good versus evil."
Petrarch was the first to coopt the metaphor and give
it secular meaning as a humanist by reversing its application.
Classical Antiquity, so long considered the "dark age" for
its lack of Christianity, was now seen as the age of
"light" because of its cultural achievements, while
Petrarch's time, lacking such cultural achievements,
was now seen as the age of darkness.
Mostly this age is the age when
christianity 'took over' the known world and men were ruled
by 'faith', or more correctly, the control of the church.
During the Protestant Reformation of the 16th and 17th
Century, Protestants wrote about it as
a period of Catholic corruption. Just as Petrarch's
writing was not an attack on
Christianity per se -in addition to his humanism he was
deeply occupied with the search for God-neither of course
was this an attack on Christianity, but the opposite: a
drive to restore what Protestants saw as a "purer"
Christianity. In response to these attacks Catholic
reformers developed a counterimage, depicting the age
as a period of social and religious harmony, and not
"dark" at all.
During the 17th and 18th century, in the age of
Enlightenment, religion was seen as antithetical to reason.
Because the Middle Ages was an "Age of Faith" when religion
reigned, it was seen as a period contrary to reason, and
thus contrary to the Enlightenment. Immanuel Kant and
Voltaire were two Enlightenment writers who were vocal
in attacking the religiously dominated Middle Ages as a
period of social decline. Many modern negative conceptions
of the age come from Enlightenment authors.
Dark ages concept
Attacks on Freemasonry
Freemasons have always been encouraged to 'learn more'. When they hear about Hiram Abiff
for the first time, they automatically go the the bible and try and find anything
else they can about him. They don't find anything other than the Biblical tale of Hiram
finishing the Temple and no clues what-so-ever of him being murdered. But what happens
typically is that he starts researching...reading about Solomon's Temple ect. We have
found only one Masonic site on the information Highway that shows Egyptian motif in
the Temple. But that one clue leads to more questions and yet more answers, if it is
persued. This site is proof there is definately alot more to be learned. But most of
it is hidden, covered up by government agencies, and tossed aside by the church.
Independent research, not religiously bias, uncovers ignored and ancient scrolls,
texts and what you have seen here so far. None of it agrees with church doctrine, so
they don't like us and will do anything to discredit us. If the Mason really puts his
mind to it, nothing the church can say will change his mind after he discovers for
himself what is correct and true and what is not.
It is our opinion that Jesus was
a Mason. We think we've proven it here. (see our 'Jesus' pages) This doesn't have
anything to do with organized religion. It's a matter of moral ethics, brotherly
love, and committment to help our fellow man no matter what faith he might be.
When it comes right down to it, some of us don't have a religion because we
refuse to let anyone tell us what we should or should not believe. That doesn't
make us athiests or heretics it makes us 'free'.
Some critics of Freemasonry claim the recommended readings
for some of the degrees of Freemasonry are "pagan." Pagan, as they are
using the term, simply means pre-Christian. The study of man's moral and
intellectual history allows the achievement of Freemasonry's major purpose,
the enhancement of an individual's moral and intellectual development. Such
a study has to start with the concepts of man and God as held by early
cultures and evidenced in their mythologies. The ancient Greeks and Romans,
as well as earlier peoples, had much of importance to say on many topics,
including religion. The idea that a physician must act in the best
interests of his patient comes from the pagan Hypocrites, and the concept
that a government cannot break into your house and take what it wants on
a whim comes from the pagan Aristotle. None of us would want to live in a
world without these ideas.
Attacks on Freemasonry are not new to our
fraternity. From the early 1700s to Hitler and Mussolini's persecution
of Freemasons in the 30s, Franco's execution of Freemasons in the 1950s
and the Iranian government's elimination of Freemasons in the 1980s,
to today's attacks by some religious organizations, one thing is evidently
clear, Freemasonry has survived the test of time while most of the
organizations who have attacked Freemasonry have not .
From Northern Ireland to Iran, from the Middle East to the
United States, religious extremism is a growing force throughout
the world. Jarred by the rapid pace of social and cultural change,
especially the apparent disintegration of moral values and the break-up
of the family, some people within this movement have sought refuge from
the complexity of modern life by embracing absolute views and rejecting
tolerance of other beliefs.
Simple, easy, seemingly stable answers bring comfort in a rapidly
changing world. For example, some religious organizations have responded
to the personal anguish of their members by circling the wagons, that
is, by strictly defining theological concepts and insisting their
members "purify" their fellowship by renouncing any other beliefs.
The next step, already taken by various religious organizations,
is to yield degrees of control within their ranks to vocal factions
espousing extremist views. These splinter groups focus the congregation's
generalized anxieties on specific targets. The proffered cure-all is to
destroy the supposed enemy. Freemasonry has become one of these targets
precisely because it encourages members to form their own opinion on many
important topics, including religion.
Thus some churches have expressed concerns, even condemnations,
of Freemasonry. Generally, these are knee jerk actions and are based on
misunderstandings and false information. A case in point is the June
1993 report to the Southern Baptist Convention by the Convention's Home
Mission Board. This report defined eight alleged conflicts between the
tenets and teachings of the Masonic fraternity and Southern Baptist
theology. see Attacks
Consider this - the meaning of 'dogma';
Typically in Christian theology, but in many other religions' theologies too, a dogma is an
absolute theological foundation, that must be strictly held as an indisputable principle in order
to be a faithful follower of that religion.
Dogma eminently distinguishes itself from theological opinions, or beliefs,
about which the faithful are free to disagree, for its absolute character;
as a fundamental part of the religion, it cannot be disputed, revised or
otherwise doubted, but has to be respected by faith. However, dogmas can
be discussed and even expanded upon, provided that doing so doesn't
overturn or contradict the original teaching. The disagreement on
dogmas is heresy and usually leads to the expulsion of the heretics
from the religious group.
The specific beliefs on dogmas and their sources, can considerably
vary among religious groups. For most of Eastern Christianity, the dogmas
are contained in the
and the first two, three, or seven ecumenical councils (depending on
whether one is a Nestorian, a Monophysite, or an Eastern Orthodox Christian)
. Protestants may also affirm these, but often rely on a "Statement of
Faith" which summarizes their dogmas, drawn up by their individual
When you get to the bottom of the above link, you see the whole thing is based
on a catholic point of view, which means they wrote it. So if you're not
catholic why does this faith based theory which they compiled as the 'New
Testament', hold so much importance?
There was no KJ Bible until 473 AD! And the one you have in your home was
interpretated and written by ROMANS...catholics to be exact.
It also means that if you're not catholic, you're not even a christian.
Ask them if you don't believe this. Christianity is a Roman MAN MADE religion.
Not founded or professed by Jesus in any way, shape or form. This should explain
why the disciples were discredited in the NT and why Jesus told them they would
be hated and hunted down like criminals...But there is an even bigger 'cover-up' here.
The disciples were Gnostic and the Romans had all the Gnostics hunted down and
killed and blamed it on the Jews. The NT is purely Roman and they hated not only
the Jews but also women. Why do you think Mary Magdalene was portrayed as a
In Antioch the new Faith was preached to, and accepted
by the Greeks with such success that
received here its name, perhaps originally intended
as a nickname by the witty Antiochenes (Acts, xi, 26). The new community,
once acknowledged by the mother-church of Jerusalem (Acts, xi, 22 sq.),
soon manifested its vitality and its intelligence of the faith by its spontaneous
act of generosity toward the brethren of Jerusalem (Acts, xi, 27-30). The
place of apprenticeship of the Apostle of the Gentiles (Acts, xi, 26), Antioch,
became the headquarters of Paul and Barnabas, first together, later Paul alone.
In fact, Paul was the only one to claim himself to be a disciple. He is
discredited as a lier in the Nag Hammidi texts by the very person made a
Saint by the catholic church...Peter. And you will notice that the christians
tell you these texts are false and fake...Think again my friend!.
Matthew 13:35, "I will utter things which have been kept
secret from the foundation of the world."
Thus begins a long list of official information
that tries to justify a new faith not founded by Jesus, his disciples or his
followers. In fact Jesus' disciples were all first discredited
and then killed to shut them up! A few escaped however...We have already
disclosed who they were...in the Nag Hammidi scrolls.
The elimination of a sect called Essenes or Gnostics was the main goal
of the Romans 2000 years ago. They susceeded in wiping out the real followers
of Christ... And any trace of the religion they were opposed to and didn't
agree with. This religion was Gnostic and there is proof right now in the
presently on-line version of the Catholic encyclopedia. We get into this on
a larger scale later when we reveal who killed the disciples and why in our
'death of the disciples' series.
Islam also uses this same fear and control tactic. They convience
their followers that they must die for Allah, defending their faith.
They also teach them it is heroic and they will be rewarded for killing
Americans. They encourage suicide bombers to die for Allah. The Germans
under Hitler used the same mind control tactic when they forced genocide
on the Jews....and furthermore Hitler was Catholic. We make other connections
to this 'mind control' faith on Passage forward.
The 'fear' and 'control' Jewish view copied by Roman
popes and bishops included the creation of an opponent of god who is actually worse at
inflicting hardship and punishment on mankind than the god in Genesis.
This was an evil monster that would carry you off to eternal punishment in
a firey furnace. It has horns, carries a pitched fork
and wears a red suit..... But this punishment is usually associated with death or
what the Egyptians called 'the afterlife'.
This opponent they named 'Satan'.
There is nobody called Satan anywhere
in the Old Testament of the bible. There is NO Devil!
This is an invention of a Roman Bishop, now known as St Jerome, to be exact.
Albert Pike, born in December, 1809 in Boston Massachusetts; died April 2 , 1891
in Washington, D.C., was an attorney, soldier, writer, and Freemason. This is only 15 years after the 1846-76
archeological excavations at Nineveh, Iraq which Pike may have had access to or at the very least he probably
heard about. Pike purchases a newspaper in Little Rock Arkansas in 1835 called the Advocate.
He had in the interim joined a Masonic lodge and become extremely active in the affairs
of the organization, being elected Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite's
Southern Jurisdiction in 1859. He remained Sovereign Grand Commander for the
remainder of his life (a total of thirty-two years), devoting a large amount of his
time to developing the rituals of the order. In this he traveled extensively and was in
Europe and France several times. Pike studied ancient religion. So where did he get the idea
that Lucifier was god?
'Lucifer, the Son of the Morning' refered to the
planet Venus because Venus appears on the horizon before the rising of the sun,
it symbolizes the bringing of light and the attainment of knowledge. But as we
said 'Lucifier' is a misnomer. There is no such diety.
Here we see part of St. Jerome's 'created' monster - Lucifer.
St Jerome - CHRONOLOGY
The theological writings of St. Jerome are mainly controversial
works, one might almost say composed for the occasion.
His "Dialogue" against the Luciferians deals with a schismatic sect whose founder
was Lucifer, Bishop of Cagliari in Sardinia.
Schismatic; NOUN: A person who dissents from the doctrine of an established
church: dissenter, dissident, HERETIC, nonconformist, sectarian, sectary,
separationist, separatist... See 'RELIGION'.
The Luciferians refused to approve of the
measure of clemency by which the Church, since the Council of Alexandria,
in 362, had allowed bishops, who had adhered to
to continue to discharge their duties on condition of professing
the Nicene Creed. (Jesus was God by vote)
Lucifer is not a name. Lucifer is a title like President, Prime minister etc.
When the Catholic church decided that they would somehow get mention of
another fictional entity (Satan) into the old testament they used the verse
where the god of the bible was speaking about the King of Babylon and called
the King, 'Bright and Morning Star.'
The catholics forbid astrology. We describe
Venus as 'The Bright Morning Star'. They forgot that we know the Star as the
'Divine Shekinah' and it is mentioned over and over
in the Hebrew text. But this is how the title Lucifer became synonamous with satan.
The Mark of Cain
A few years back, workers toiling in an underground chamber beneath a medieval
cathedral in Geneva, Switzerland uncovered a strange mosaic tile floor, thought to be of
great antiquity. The mosaic depicted an icon beloved by the Merovingians: the Black Sun.
The Priory of Sion claims that one of its principle commandaries is in Geneva, and if so, this
may be it. For hidden away in the cathedral’s recesses, far from public view, is one of
Christendom’s strangest set of relics: a plate and cup connected to the legends of Cain,
Solomon, Christ, and Lucifer.
In an ancient variation on Biblical tradition, the so-called “mark of Cain” - believed to
have been inflicted upon Adam’s first son - is said to have been caused by a stone that fell
from Lucifer’s crown during the war in Heaven and bounced off Cain‘s forehead. According
to this lore, the mark was in the shape of a red serpent. The jewel from Lucifer’s crown
became a sacred relic, and was handed down dynastically from father to son, eventually
coming into the possession of King Solomon. He hired a master craftsman to carve the
huge stone into a plate and drinking vessel. According to this same legend, these very
utensils were later used by Christ at the Last Supper. This story, bizarre though it may
be, is emblematic of the unambiguously Luciferian symbolism that recurs constantly in
regards to lore of the Grail bloodline - symbolism that has been consciously cultivated by
the Merovingians throughout their history. see
The word "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14:12 presents a minor problem to mainstream Christianity.
It becomes a much larger problem to Bible literalists, and becomes a huge obstacle for the
claims of Mormonism. John J. Robinson in A Pilgrim's Path, pp. 47-48 explains:
"Lucifer makes his appearance in the fourteenth chapter of the Old Testament book of Isaiah,
at the twelfth verse, and nowhere else: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of
the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
The first problem is that Lucifer is a Latin name. So how did it find its way into a Hebrew
manuscript, written before there was a Roman language? To find the answer, I consulted
a scholar at the library of the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati. What Hebrew name, I
asked, was Satan given in this chapter of Isaiah, which describes the angel who fell to
become the ruler of hell?
The answer was a surprise. In the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of
Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his
lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either
by name or reference. The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early Christian
scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that
they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the
original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer."
Why Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name
given to the morning star
(the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus).
The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun.
The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, bringer, or bearer, of
In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his
death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of
the Dawn." Them name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court
(much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation,
"The Sun King").
"Lucifer"; Cambridge Dictionary.
Etymology: Middle English, the morning star, a fallen rebel archangel,
the Devil, from Old English, from Latin, the morning star, from lucifer
light-bearing, from luc-, lux light + -fer -ferous -- more at LIGHT
Date: before 12th century
1 -- used as a name of the devil
2 : the planet Venus when appearing as the morning star
3 not capitalized : a friction match having as active substances antimony sulfide
and potassium chlorate
- Lu·ci·fe·ri·an /"lü-s&-'fir-E-&n/ adjective. copied from
The Bright Morning Star goes to the misnomer of "Lucifer", which is an
incorrect title for Satan or the Devil taken from the King James Version of
Isaiah 14:12. Were it not for this odd transliteration, "Lucifer" would not
exist as a term in English, and there would be no confusion on the matter.
As it is, we need to be careful, I would suggest, in using the term to describe
who the Bible calls "Satan" or "the Devil". Most Christians are onto this, yet
still the term "Lucifer" persists.
In any case, the
"morning star" is the title of Christ throughout the rest of Scripture so
how can they associate it with any such character as satan?
2 Pet 1:19 (NIV) "And we have the word of the
prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it,
as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in
Though this is purely a philosophical abstraction, it is interesting
insofar as one would not logically expect to find even a single tradition in which Christ was identified
as a serpent, let alone several. Yet the examples from Moses, the cabala, and the
Ophite Gnostics would
seem to indicate that people had some concrete reason for making such a connection. We
know that for many years following the death of Moses, the bronze serpent made by him
became a sacred object of idolotry for the early Israelites.
Rev 2:28 (NIV) I will also give him the morning star.
Jesus: Rev 22:16 (NIV) "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this
testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and
the bright Morning Star."
“Christ came as a manifestation of the light-bearing serpent...
The serpent brought humanity knowledge (gnosis) of good and evil (Genesis 3:1-7), and can further
aid man in getting the fruit of eternal life, thus making man like God, or like Christ.”
The contradiction is very plain.
The true meaning of the 'Bright Morning Star'
This is a picture of an underground cave like structure. The
most notable one is located in Newgrange England.
It served as a temple. When the Bright Morning Star showed itsself through
the slit over the door it was the beginning of an 8 year cycle. This always occured
on the spring equinox. We have other pictures and the caves are the major subject
of a book by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas called Uriel's Machine. Evidence
found in the investigation of these caves suggests that Enoch himself visited one.
The walls inside the cave were lined with white quartz. Enoch 71.5 "And the Spirit
carried Enoch off to the Highest Heaven, and I saw there, in the middle of that
Light, something built of crystal stones, and in the middle of those stones
tongues of living fire." from
The storehouses and see
The Book of HEAVENLY LUMINARIES
in which Enoch explains the cources of the planets and their relationship to the
counting of 'time'.
And see Enoch's book about
The turning of lights in the sky
Our detailed look at these caves and their significance is on
The "Morning Star" is representative of the
8 and 40 year cycles of the rising of the planet Venus that are mentioned
no less than 100 times in the bible. The 40 year cycle is then
multiplied by numbers that equal; The exodus - 1547 BC, Moses birth - 1590 BC,
the building of Solomon's Temple in 967 BC, which is 10,367 years after the flood.
(from The Book of Hiram)The flood was - we think in apx 11,400 BC. There are three
sources for this date each independently arrived at.
The distruction of the second Temple - 70 AD. Jesus birth - 1440 years after Moses
leads the people through the desert, ect., which was actually March 17th, of 7 BC.
And recall the 40 years in the desert which may not be actual fact. Fourty years after Jesus
birth in 33 AD., He was cruisified.
1000 years after the birth, (7 BC) the Templars made plans to come back to the destroyed Temple.
They did in 1099. In 1140 AD the scrolls were brought to St Clair lands in Scotland.
Rosslyn was built exactly 1440 years after the birth of Jesus. Building began in
1441 AD., completed 40 years later in 1486 AD.
A prophesy specifically
stated that those who died in the distruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, will
be resurrected 1000 years later when a godless power will take Jerusalem.
The revitalized priests of the Bright Morning Star must have been even
more convinced that history was repeating itself - and that the power
of prophesy had returned - because 1000 years after the loss of the
beloved city and the Temple, Jerusalem was sacked by the Seljuk Turks.
Astrology and the planet Venus played a very
important role in ancient Egypt and Jerusalem for thousands of years. Venus
was called "The Bright Morning Star".
The planet has a fourty year cycle
that seems to coinside with major events in the Hebrew history. There are no
less than 100 examples of the 40 year cycle used throughout the bible.
In the early Qabalah the planet is called the