* * * * * *ORIGINAL
POST *
* * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:45 AM
Subject: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
Brothers,
The "Webb" lecture on the 47th problem,
"This was an invention of our Ancient friend and
brother, the Great Pythagorus . . .", bothered
me from the first time I heard it. Almost every statement
in the lecture is false and to me did not seem proper for
Masonic presentation. Therefore, in my rebellious youth, I
wrote the following substitute, which, I think, is both
factual and philosphically valid.
The first time I used it was at a MM degree where a
Custodian of the Work was on the side lines. After the
degree I asked him what he thought about my 47th problem
presentation. He hadn't even noticed that I had departed
from the standard lecture!
Since then I have used it many times and no one has ever
commented on the departure from prescribed wording. This
demonstrates to me that by that time in the MM work most
ears have yielded to overload and the only ones aware of
what I am saying are the new MM's who are hearing it for
the first time.
The 47th Problem of Euclid
This ancient mathematical theorem was discovered and
re-discovered many times during a 2000 year period.
Masonic tradition attributes its invention to the Greek
philosopher Pythagoras, but every civilization that
developed a formal mathematical system based on
geometrical concepts has found this to be a central part
of their theories. From its ancient use in
performing accurate land measurement to its modern
appearance in the theories of relativity and quantum
mechanics, this proposition has played a key role in man¹s
understanding of the universe. It should inspire
Masons to appreciate the beauties of science and geometry.
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
Bro:. Rod,
I think the unfortunate truth is that many sideliners tune out
during the lectures because they have heard it all before and
couldn't possibly learn something new from it. However,
Freemasonry is a system that is taught through repetition.
I am glad that you have tried to think beyond the words.
The repetition, like the practice in anything, is designed to
allow the mind and body to go beyond the form to stop the
"thinking" and get on with the experience.
Think of Larry Bird (okay I am aging myself) when he
played for the Boston Celtics. He was renowned for his
free throw accuracy. While he certainly was a gifted
athelete. His greatest gift was non-stop practice.
What do you think would have happened to his accuracy if he
decided he had become a free throw expert and didn't need to
practice anymore?
Memorization for the sake of memorization creates
"ritual parrots" as we say in Freemasonry. But
to take those words, lectures and symbols and create an
understanding is a completely different idea altogether.
Frat:.
Ted Berry
Washington DC
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
MW Bro. Rod brings up two problems in the Webb work.
The first is the innovation of canned lectures, versus the
explanatory and very personal lectures that would mean so much
more to everyone. Most members wouldn't consider
parroting the Master Mason symbolic lecture to be the easy way
out, but rote memorization should never have been allowed to
replace the creative processes needed to truly help the new
member understand an important portion of freemasonry.
And this goes for the entire masonic career of most masons.
As another commenter pointed out, once a lecture has been
heard a few times, most members either avoid the room, leave
the room, or take a mini-vacation, and end up never having the
least idea of what the symbols are supposed to teach.
Standardization in the pursuit of such knowledge does not seem
to be very effective.
The second is having lecturers standing up there and
essentially lying to all assembled. The Holy Saints John
masons? I doubt it. I have been too lazy to do the
work Bro. Rod has done in avoiding these exaggerations, but I
have added a few 'are said to have been' and 'according to
Masonic tradition' when they seemed necessary.
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
Brethren,
I did not say that memorization had no use. In fact I
pointed out one of the reasons for memorization. I also think
that providing your own edits to the ritual can cause its own
problems. The ritual says what it says for a reason.
If you look at the words too literally, you will be
dissatisfied with the
facts. Remember that ours is a system of morality veiled in
allegory and illustrated by symbols. The words are but
the outer veil of that allegory. The meaning lies
within.
The ritual and lectures should, in my opinion, be delivered as
written. It is up to the Candidate's Mentor to work with
him to dig behind those words and into the real meaning of our
Craft. During that process, the real Work can be done
explanations offered, where needed, to clarify apparent errors
in fact with the potential symbolic meaning they might convey.
Frat:.
Ted Berry
Washington DC
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Dear Bro. Ted,
I agree with you. I am beginning to see just how
important the
Blue Lodge Rituals are, now & I noticed Numerous mistakes
in the
Rituals, when I came through. One guy meant well, but
kept messing words up, such as "Past" for
"Pass," etc.--very confusing to anyone who hasn't
read the Rituals. "Do you have the Past?" just
didn't quite make any sense.
Personally, I am afraid to have Brothers "Innovate"
the rituals,
at their own discretion--regardless of Intent. So much
of this
information is meant to convey meanings locked into Time.
Modernizing the Rituals could be a disaster. Besides, I
believe The
Monitor states that we are not to make Innovations upon the
Rituals.
If you let one guy change the words, then everyone is allowed
to
change things around...then, suddenly, we will find ourselves
in very
precarious situations.
Perhaps, the Rituals are even set-up to MAKE you think about
the
statements, thus leading to Investigation....? Whereas,
simply
stating the research would preclude most people's individual
research.
Regardless, I'm with Ted on this issue. No Innovations
on the
Rituals, please.
Laborare Est Orare,
Graham Douglas Lincoln
Utica #337 / A.A.S.R. 32° (S. Jurisdiction)
2b1ask1 : http://indianamasons.org
http://www.southernindianamasonry.org/index.html
http://www.kymason.com/aasr/main.htm
"Study The Book of Nature, Brother-it Bears the stamp of
Deity." -
Old Masonic Admonition
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
Bro:. Graham,
You have touched the central topic here:Perhaps, the Rituals
are even set-up to MAKE you think about the statements, thus
leading to Investigation....? Whereas, simply stating
the research would preclude most people's individual research.
The rituals are to make a deep and lasting impression on the
Candidate and to continue the teaching of the 'experienced'
Brethren. We must take great care in making changes
because we don't really know all of the reasons the authors
wrote what they wrote. Perhaps some facts were out of
ignorance. Other apparent errors have no basis in fact
because the teaching lies underneath.
Frat:.
Ted Berry
Washington DC
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of
Euclid
From: Veritas_gdl, grahamlincoln@lycos.com
Dear Bro. Ted,
I agree with you. I am beginning to see just how
important the
Blue Lodge Rituals are, now & I noticed Numerous mistakes
in the
Rituals, when I came through. One guy meant well, but
kept messing words up, such as "Past" for
"Pass," etc.--very confusing to anyone who hasn't
read the Rituals. "Do you have the Past?" just
didn't quite make any sense.
Personally, I am afraid to have Brothers "Innovate"
the rituals,
at their own discretion--regardless of Intent. So much
of this
information is meant to convey meanings locked into Time.
And if we were living in that time then they would still have
the same
meaning.
Modernizing the Rituals could be a disaster. Besides, I
believe The
Monitor states that we are not to make Innovations upon the
Rituals.
The rituals that we all use ARE the result of multiple
innovations in the pre-existing rituals. The Webb work was one
of the greatest innovations in the form of the teaching. We
seem to be very happy with the results, both good and bad.
If you let one guy change the words, then everyone is allowed
to
change things around...then, suddenly, we will find ourselves
in very
precarious situations.
If there is anyone from Iowa on this list, I hope they will
tell, first
hand, how the "middle chamber" work is done there.
If not, then I will tell what I have been told about each S.D.
being encouraged to write his own version.
Perhaps, the Rituals are even set-up to MAKE you think about
the
statements, thus leading to Investigation....? Whereas,
simply
stating the research would preclude most people's individual research.
Good old Aristotelian logic shows us that if you start with a
false
premise then you can logically derive any conclusion, either
true or
false. The fallacy that many of the mystical bent make is to
accept false premises about reality and then go on to derive
the most god awful conclusions.
The same thing happens in Masonry when new Masons are given false
premises by old experts (e.g. all the "it's never been
done so we can't do it" explanations for doing things
that have no reason; the "this is the way it has always
been done" assertion that leave out the "in the XXX
years that I have been here" qualification; the
"this is what the code says" when the code has been
changed for a decade; the "ritual says what it says for a
reason" while assuming that the "reason" is not
in fact an error.)
If the ritual is the foundation of a Mason's experience, then
it behooves us to make the ritual as true and strong and
unassailable as possible, and to beware revering the old just
because it is old, while remembering that the things we
consider justified by age were themselves once innovations.
Regardless, I'm with Ted on this issue. No Innovations
on the
Rituals, please.
If there had been no innovations there would be no formal
ritual other than reading the charges.
Rod Larson
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Brothers,
I'm just a simple newbie that looks at *everything* as a
symbol for me to ponder, and if I develop some internal
behavior or thought that makes me behave just a little bit
better toward my fellow man, I've gotten my yearly dues worth.
I find it very interesting that virtually every civilization
has "found"
the 47th problem through their own methods, and we could
probably spend countless years researching when and where it
first started, and what problem it was developed to answer.
Maybe it has been with us since "Time
Immemorial"????
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid.
Dear Brothers all, Let me see here: Bro. Rod says that he was
bothered by parts of the Webb lecture on the 47th problem
(actually it is the 47th PROBLEM of Euclid as stated in my
original copy of Webb's work) and states that "Almost
every statement in the lecture is false ..." . Question:
just what part is false and why? Do you mean that it is
historically inaccurate or that as an illusion to the legends
used by Freemasonry to represent and illustrate certain ideas
it is
incorrect? Possibly there is a new discovery in
mathematical science that has recently come to light which
proves that Euclid was wrong? Ascribing to non-Euclidean
geometry (Masonry)?
Since Brother Webb might seem to be at fault here and
considering
that he is not actively present to support or deny any
challenges to his work, it might serve us well to recall that
the title of his work is The Freemason's Monitor; or
Illustrations of Masonry . The book contains no
pictures, diagrams or other graphical representations so may
we then say that the object of his work was not to
"illustrate" the work of the Craft but that it
represents the "Illustrations" which the Craft
itself uses to communicate it's philosophy.
If this is true, it is an integral part of the teachings of
Freemasonry and therefore should not be allowed to be changed
at the romantic desires of any of us. That would be like
throwing out the bathwater, the baby and the tub -maybe even
the table too- all at once.
Remembering that each of us JOINS Masonry and not that Masonry
joins us, we are told to speculate -to think on our own
according to our experiences and backgrounds- in order that we
might learn to grow and above all, to change. If each
member was allowed to change the ritual to suit his own
interpretation of it, we would only serve to rebuild that
Temple of Babel and not the House of Solomon.
Certainly question everything, determine what it is that it
means
to you as an individual but leave it intact so that the
next person walking down the path can enjoy the challenge and
experience. It is constantly repeated that no ONE member or
group of members can speak for or represent the entire
Fraternity. Likewise, no single Mason has a lock on the
meaning or interpretation of the teachings.
Really. (Also wouldn't it be most un-Masonic to deny any
of the new Brothers the opportunity to learn and expand their
knowledge and thereby their own abilities?)
As for the comment of others that standard repetition just
puts
members to sleep or sends them on a little
"vacation", we might also think of those few
Brothers who continually return to Lodge to witness the
presentation of the Degrees. Sure they've heard it a
hundred times before, yet there are those most unique
individuals who derive a unique lesson from each viewing
and/or participation in the ritual.
"Parroting" ? Sure, that happens all the time
and well that it does. Each of us is an individual and
therefore learns in a different way and at different speeds.
That Brother who takes a "temporary mental absence"
from the present conditions might just have realized some
modicum of insight into a rather vexing personal problem -
thus affording him the chance to alter his actions or thoughts
in a way that might benefit not only himself, his family and
who knows what else.
If we measure only by our own standard all else is sure to
come up
either in excess or lacking. There might just be some
reason why Masons are given a gauge as a working tool in the
2nd. Not only for the passage of time but the passage of
mind also.
In his re-writing of the portion of the lecture, might I
inquire to Bro. Larson concerning his re-writing of the
lecture portion: (as stated above, Webb wrote that it
was the "Forty-seventh Problem of Euclid") but
even this isn't really correct because it was a Proof offered
by Euclid to a Theorem ostensibly attributed to Pythagoras.
What "Masonic tradition" do you refer to as
attributing the "invention" of Pythagoras? Did
such civilizations such as the Maya use the
"theorem" as a "central part of their
theories" ? [might it not be the proof of the theorem
(attributed to Euclid) that is used rather than the
proposition (attributed to Pythagoras) that is used?] .
In what portion of relativity theory and quantum mechanics
does the 47th Proposition make it's appearance?
Going on to and important facet of Bro. Larson's statement:
Why
should Masons be inspired to "appreciate the beauties of
science and geometry" when the statement of Webb (if we
are to use this source as an Authority) is that "It
teaches masons to be general lovers of the arts and
sciences." Also why limit it to only two thousand
years? It is unlikely that Pythagoras (3rd century BCE
so 2000) was the originator or true "inventor"
of the Proposition, that is only attributed to him by some
historians and even then many of them offer doubts.
Common experience is to relate the name Pythagoras to
Mathematics and specifically Geometry. However a look
into the subjects that were taught at the school started by
Pythagoras of Samos - geometry, music, number theory and
astronomy which were supplemented with rhetoric, grammar and
logic - just might lead to a more (dare I say it?) Freemasonic
connection?
Then there is that other aspect of Pythagoras, but then you
know
that one don't you?
Sincerely and Fraternally, POTS
Ken Christianson*
Glendale, California
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Brothers Graham, Ted & others:
Let us not forget that there is nothing uniform in word and
thought
officially from Jurisdiction to Jurisdiction. A letter perfect
MM lecture is not the same in the GL of New York,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, California, Washington DC, Indiana, etc.
And certainly not the same in the GL of Western Australia,
UGLE, Scotland, etc.
Don't get hung up on the words or their
"truthfulness". We should remember the inner
meaning, the "natural" truths we are trying to teach
our candidates. They are the important persons that we are
attempting to teach, not the old, set in their way Brethren.
Brother Mike Beltzer
Junior Warden
Cuyahoga Falls Lodge #735
GL F&AM of Ohio
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 8:45 AM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Hello, Mike & All
I am simply very concerned about "Innovations,"
because my first
experience with "Lodge of Instruction" involved a
certain guy
teaching in the name of G.L., that "we are all here
because of Jesus/
Christianity" and he was, basically preaching
Chrisitanity at the
Altar of F&AM...saying that F&AM is based upon
Christianity.
The "Holy Bible" is an innovation upon the rituals,
and now most
Masons I have met seem to think F&AM is based upon The
Holy Bible and Christianity--despite the fact that F&AM is
*supposed* to be based upon "Universality" (and, as
any Anti-Mason can tell you, we are *supposedly* welcoming of
ALL Men of All Religions, Races, Colors, Creeds, etc.--not
just White Christian Males).
Because I have seen someone trying to preach their version of
Truth at the Altar of F&AM, I am very concerned about
"Innovations." Technically, the Rituals should
read "Volume of Sacred Law," Not "Holy
Bible." However.... If people would actually
read The Monitor and study a little, they would know that and
leaving the discovery to others would be just fine. Many
things were taught to me, that are NOT in the Rituals, after I
was raised as an MM (methods of recognition, etc.).
Explaining the meaning of "V.S.L." (Volume of Sacred
Law) should be an important element of that teaching.
However, unlike the rest of the Mystery Schools in the world,
F&AM has virtually stopped teaching and just gives out
titles and the Candidate is on his own....
I find it rather odd that I had to learn about Masonic
Libraries
from a NY Mason & John J. Robinson. Why was I not
informed, in the Lodge?
The lack of education in F&AM precludes changing things,
at-least
where I live. The way things are going where I live,
Hiram may be
replaced by Jesus or something to that effect.
When people are placed in positions of authority and/or power,
they often use that position to espouse their own
theories/rhetoric.
It seems to be a better Idea to collect all of the Monitors
(and
Rituals) from every state and every country and put them all
together
into one large book, then distribute that book to every Grand
Lodge,
with enough copies for each individual Lodge and each MASONIC
LIBRARY (including the Scottish Rite Libraries, etc.)....then,
after decades of pondering that one book of collected
Monitors, the Fraternity as a whole could probably create a
wonderful Universal Monitor (and Rituals).
I signed a KY Masons Monitor and it was twice as thick as
mine. I
would LOVE to see such a work in my lifetime.
For now, however, the lack of education in F&AM precludes
the
right to start changing things at this time. Too many
people do not
really know enough about the subject to alter the rituals.
The really knowledgable guys should put-together some kind of
Test. If the test isn't completed with reasonable
accuracy, the
person taking the test should have no involvement with
altering the
rituals..... Maybe, in two or three decades the Rituals
could be
married, consolidated and "fixed" but, it should be
by the consensus of The Fraternity, as a whole, and each G.L.
should have say in the matter. A long, slow
process, creating more accurate Rituals--after much Research.
The idea of people making changes on an Individual level is
frightening.
Look at the way the Constitution is being thrown out the
window,
as we speak. Look at the moron down south, with the Ten
Commandments in the Courthouse, carved in stone. That
could happen in F&AM as well--destroying the Universality
of F&AM.
Numerous men think a person must be a Christian to be a
Mason--
which defeats the purpose of the organization.
At this time, the level of Masonic Education (or lack thereof)
should be testament to the fact that we should not change the
Rituals, until we know what we are doing.
Men with interesting ideas, and proposed changes could Submit
their ideas to the collective Council of all G.L.s/Philalethes
and
the changes could be voted on..... Yet, as I said, this
process
would take Decades to be accomplished Properly. I don't
think the
G. L.'s have ever operated on this level, but it could be done
& would
lead to a more firmly Cemented Society.
Take Care.
Laborare Est Orare,
Graham Douglas Lincoln
Utica #337 / A.A.S.R. 32° (SMJ)
http://www.geocities.com/veritas_gdl/index.htm
2b1ask1 : http://indianamasons.org
http://www.southernindianamasonry.org/index.html
http://www.kymason.com/aasr/main.htm
"Study The Book of Nature, Brother-it Bears the stamp of
Deity." -
Old Masonic Admonition
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Brother Graham:
Agreed. Amen. So Mote It Be!
Brother Mike Beltzer,
I have been in Lodge when the name of Jesus Christ has been
invoked. And have been told by several Brothers, in Lodge and
out, that Masonry is a Christian organization. Being a
non-Christian and a Mason for 33 years it rankles me that this
occurs, but in the spirit of Freemasonry, I'll only respond to
this in private conversation. Note that when a prayer is said
in the name of Jesus, it loses much of its meaning to me. The
same would be said if appeared in another religious name
(Mohamed, Bhudda, etc.).
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Bro. Rod writes:
"The 'Webb' lecture on the
47th Problem... bothered me from the first time I heard it.
Almost every statement in the lecture is false and to me did
not seem proper for Masonic presentation. Therefore, in my
rebellious youth, I wrote the following substitute, which, I
think, is both factual and philosphically valid....
"This ancient mathematical theorem
was discovered and re-discovered many times during a 2000 year
period.... From its ancient use in performing accurate land
measurement to its modern appearance
in the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics...."
I'm not against editing or modernizing
the prose of Masonic ritual, but as a brother I'd urge you to
proceed under the rules and regulations of your Grand Lodge.
It's only fair; think of it as intellectual property rights.
Perhaps your ideas should first take the
form of a research paper presented in a proper forum or
published in an appropriate Masonic periodical. There it
may gain credibility and could take root.
In addition, I'd say that the changes you make should be based
on
Freemasonry's founding documents and valid history.
References to quantum mechanics in a monologue that implicitly
dates [at least] to the 18th century will confound your
audience. Start with Mackey's "The Legend of
Euclid" and from there try various MSS.
In other words, brethren, look to the PAST for clarity.
It's there.
Jay Hochberg
Menorah Lodge, No. 249, F & AM
New Jersey, USA
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: [MasEd] On changing Ritual.
Greetings Brethren,
Here in Utah the Webb lectures aren't used, so I have little
or no familiarity with them. I have, however, found that if
any innovation is to be made to Ritual it must be done with
extreme care.
As an example, we have had a movement to make public the
ceremony of constituting a new Lodge. In the current tyled
ritual the language includes the statement that the Lodge is
"empowered" to perform degrees (i.e. make masons).
If the language is "modernized", as has been
suggested, some Brother might wish to change that word to
"authorized" as having a clearer meaning.
He'd be wrong. To "empower" is literally to give
spiritual substance, not just authority. Manna, if you will,
cosmic or spiritual power and ability. If we change the
Ritual, we may inadvertently remove much of the intended
meaning.
I agree that there are errors in our Ritual, and even the
prejudices of the past. The FC staircase lecture is certainly
anti-Roman, which every Brother who is a Roman Catholic will
instantly pick up on, therefore, it is to the Greeks, and not
the Romans, to which we owe .
The Master Mason lecture says that Abraham was about to offer
up Isaac as a sacrifice. This is the Jewish and Christian
tradition (both coming from the same book), but the Moslem
tradition is that Abraham was to offer up Ishmael - his first
born son.
If you change the Ritual, and let each Brother change it as he
will, pretty soon it's not Ritual at all, the constant
repetition being an integral part of it's meaning.
As my Lodge's chaplain, I recently wrote an essay for our
newsletter entitled "Why Ritual?". My own graduate
education being in psychology and cultural anthropology, I was
asked by the Worshipful Master to address this very question.
It is available for any who may request
it.
Fraternally,
Arthur Reilly, PM
Argenta, Lodge #3; F & AM of Utah
P.S. Pythagorus is said to have sacrificed a "hectatomb"
- which is 100 head of oxen, sacrificed according to a
particular & precise Greek ritual. ;)
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Digest Number 433 47th Problem of
Euclid
Brethren:
I’ve read all the posts and answers of other Brethren about
the
importance of being “factual” and Truthful in all of the
Ritual of our great Fraternity.
I think that you are all right in what you have said, but I
don’t think
any one of us should change it on our own but go through the
proper channels in our respective Grand lodges to get it
changed.
Just a thought!
Ed Piles
PM Gardenville-Cache Lodge #455
HP Oriental Chapter #78 RAM
St Louis, Mo
* * * * * * * *
RESPONSE * * * * * * * *
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 7:34 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: Ritual and Change
One problem in this area MAY BE that the various GLs take a
different attitude toward "innovation" in the
ritual.
A couple years ago, I undertook a review of Masonic Memorial
Services while learning the Indiana Service. A wide
variety of approaches to the Memorial Service was evidenced.
Some Grand Jurisdictions don't have a ritual; some set out a
ritual and note that it is the "suggested" ritual
for a Memorial Service. At the extremes appeared to be
[and no criticism of either] Ohio and California.
California seemed to say: "Here is the Memorial
Service ritual, and you will not deviate one word from it;
further, you will not put it on until you have been certified
to do so by a GL official."
Ohio seemed to say: "Here are three or four
different rituals for Memorial Services that you can use; and,
if you don't like any of them, use something else you think is
appropriate."
Frat.,
Steven K. Robison, PM
Editor, TrestleBoard
Jackson Lodge #146
Seymour, IN
To subscribe to the Mas-Ed list, send a blank email to:
mased-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe from the Mas-Ed list, send a blank email to:
mased-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
|