JAMES DURBIN
MOST WORSHIPFUL GRAND MASTER, 
A. F. &  A. M. 
STATE OF ILLINOIS, 2001-2 

 

r13.gif (3974 bytes)

book1.gif (1620 bytes)rr.gif (4176 bytes)
http://mastermason.com/lodge850/Reading

DISCUSSION OF THE
47th Problem of Euclid

              

tgamerst.gif (3038 bytes)

 

All design and Graphic Work
Copyright:©Mastermason.com 1998


Web Design by:
Carl A. Davenport
Our Server is: Mastermason.com,
And yours should be too





Join Freemasonry's Oldest And Most Respected WebGuild
owmg-mt.gif (6638 bytes)
We're a lot more than just a fancy logo on your homepage


  * * * * * *ORIGINAL POST * * * * * *


From: "rod" <rod@spacestar.net>
To: "MasEd List" <mased@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:45 AM
Subject: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid

Brothers,

The "Webb" lecture on the 47th problem, "This was an invention of our Ancient friend and brother, the Great Pythagorus . . .",  bothered me from the first time I heard it. Almost every statement in the lecture is false and to me did not seem proper for Masonic presentation. Therefore, in my rebellious youth, I wrote the following substitute, which, I think, is both factual and philosphically valid.

The first time I used it was at a MM degree where a Custodian of the Work was on the side lines. After the degree I asked him what he thought about my 47th problem presentation. He hadn't even noticed that I had departed from the standard lecture!

Since then I have used it many times and no one has ever commented on the departure from prescribed wording. This demonstrates to me that by that time in the MM work most ears have yielded to overload and the only ones aware of what I am saying are the new MM's who are hearing it for the first time.

The 47th Problem of Euclid

This ancient mathematical theorem was discovered and re-discovered many times during a 2000 year period.  Masonic tradition attributes its invention to the Greek philosopher Pythagoras, but every civilization that developed a formal mathematical system based on geometrical concepts has found this to be a central part of their theories.  From its ancient use in performing accurate land measurement to its modern appearance in the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, this proposition has played a key role in man¹s understanding of the universe.  It should inspire Masons to appreciate the beauties of science and geometry. 

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Ted Berry" <tedberry_dc@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid
 
 Bro:. Rod,

I think the unfortunate truth is that many sideliners tune out during the lectures because they have heard it all before and couldn't possibly learn something new from it.  However, Freemasonry is a system that is taught through repetition.

I am glad that you have tried to think beyond the words.  The repetition, like the practice in anything, is designed to allow the mind and body to go beyond the form to stop the "thinking" and get on with the experience.

 Think of Larry Bird (okay I am aging myself) when he played for the Boston Celtics.  He was renowned for his free throw accuracy.  While he certainly was a gifted athelete.  His greatest gift was non-stop practice.  What do you think would have happened to his accuracy if he decided he had become a free throw expert and didn't need to practice anymore?

 Memorization for the sake of memorization creates "ritual parrots" as we say in Freemasonry.  But to take those words, lectures and symbols and create an understanding is a completely different idea altogether.

Frat:.

Ted Berry
Washington DC

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

 

From: "Chris Christianson" <chrischristianson@earthlink.net>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid

MW Bro. Rod brings up two problems in the Webb work.  The first is the innovation of canned lectures, versus the explanatory and very personal lectures that would mean so much more to everyone.  Most members wouldn't consider parroting the Master Mason symbolic lecture to be the easy way out, but rote memorization should never have been allowed to replace the creative processes needed to truly help the new member understand an important portion of freemasonry.  And this goes for the entire masonic career of most masons.  As another commenter pointed out, once a lecture has been heard a few times, most members either avoid the room, leave the room, or take a mini-vacation, and end up never having the least idea of what the symbols are supposed to teach. Standardization in the pursuit of such knowledge does not seem to be very effective.

The second is having lecturers standing up there and essentially lying to all assembled.  The Holy Saints John masons?  I doubt it.  I have been too lazy to do the work Bro. Rod has done in avoiding these exaggerations, but I have added a few 'are said to have been' and 'according to Masonic tradition' when they seemed necessary.

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Ted Berry" <tedberry_dc@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid

 Brethren,
I did not say that memorization had no use.  In fact I pointed out one of the reasons for memorization. I also think that providing your own edits to the ritual can cause its own problems.  The ritual says what it says for a reason.

If you look at the words too literally, you will be dissatisfied with the
facts. Remember that ours is a system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols.  The words are but the outer veil of that allegory.  The meaning lies within.

The ritual and lectures should, in my opinion, be delivered as written.  It is up to the Candidate's Mentor to work with him to dig behind those words and into the real meaning of our Craft.  During that process, the real Work can be done explanations offered, where needed, to clarify apparent errors in fact with the potential symbolic meaning they might convey.

Frat:.
Ted Berry
Washington DC

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Veritas_gdl" <grahamlincoln@lycos.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:55 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Dear Bro. Ted,

I agree with you.  I am beginning to see just how important the
Blue Lodge Rituals are, now & I noticed Numerous mistakes in the
Rituals, when I came through.  One guy meant well, but kept messing words up, such as "Past" for "Pass," etc.--very confusing to anyone who hasn't read the Rituals.  "Do you have the Past?" just didn't quite make any sense.

Personally, I am afraid to have Brothers "Innovate" the rituals,
at their own discretion--regardless of Intent.  So much of this
information is meant to convey meanings locked into Time. 
Modernizing the Rituals could be a disaster.  Besides, I believe The
Monitor states that we are not to make Innovations upon the Rituals.

If you let one guy change the words, then everyone is allowed to
change things around...then, suddenly, we will find ourselves in very
precarious situations.

Perhaps, the Rituals are even set-up to MAKE you think about the
statements, thus leading to Investigation....?  Whereas, simply
stating the research would preclude most people's individual research.

Regardless, I'm with Ted on this issue.  No Innovations on the
Rituals, please.

Laborare Est Orare,
Graham Douglas Lincoln
Utica #337  /  A.A.S.R. 32° (S. Jurisdiction)
2b1ask1 : http://indianamasons.org
http://www.southernindianamasonry.org/index.html
http://www.kymason.com/aasr/main.htm
"Study The Book of Nature, Brother-it Bears the stamp of Deity."  -
Old Masonic Admonition

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Ted Berry" <tedberry_dc@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid

Bro:. Graham,

You have touched the central topic here:Perhaps, the Rituals are even set-up to MAKE you think about the statements, thus leading to Investigation....?  Whereas, simply stating the research would preclude most people's individual research.

The rituals are to make a deep and lasting impression on the Candidate and to continue the teaching of the 'experienced' Brethren.  We must take great care in making changes because we don't really know all of the reasons the authors wrote what they wrote.  Perhaps some facts were out of ignorance. Other apparent errors have no basis in fact because the teaching lies underneath.

Frat:.
Ted Berry
Washington DC

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "rod" <rod@spacestar.net>
To: "MasEd List" <mased@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
Subject:     [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid
From:        Veritas_gdl, grahamlincoln@lycos.com

Dear Bro. Ted,

I agree with you.  I am beginning to see just how important the
Blue Lodge Rituals are, now & I noticed Numerous mistakes in the
Rituals, when I came through.  One guy meant well, but kept messing words up, such as "Past" for "Pass," etc.--very confusing to anyone who hasn't read the Rituals.  "Do you have the Past?" just didn't quite make any sense.

Personally, I am afraid to have Brothers "Innovate" the rituals,
at their own discretion--regardless of Intent.  So much of this
information is meant to convey meanings locked into Time. 

And if we were living in that time then they would still have the same
meaning.

Modernizing the Rituals could be a disaster.  Besides, I believe The
Monitor states that we are not to make Innovations upon the Rituals.

The rituals that we all use ARE the result of multiple innovations in the pre-existing rituals. The Webb work was one of the greatest innovations in the form of the teaching. We seem to be very happy with the results, both good and bad.

If you let one guy change the words, then everyone is allowed to
change things around...then, suddenly, we will find ourselves in very
precarious situations.

If there is anyone from Iowa on this list, I hope they will tell, first
hand, how the "middle chamber" work is done there. If not, then I will tell what I have been told about each S.D. being encouraged to write his own version.

Perhaps, the Rituals are even set-up to MAKE you think about the
statements, thus leading to Investigation....?  Whereas, simply
stating the research would preclude most people's individual research.

Good old Aristotelian logic shows us that if you start with a false
premise then you can logically derive any conclusion, either true or
false. The fallacy that many of the mystical bent make is to accept false premises about reality and then go on to derive the most god awful conclusions.

The same thing happens in Masonry when new Masons are given false premises by old experts (e.g. all the "it's never been done so we can't do it" explanations for doing things that have no reason; the "this is the way it has always been done" assertion that leave out the "in the XXX years that I have been here" qualification; the "this is what the code says" when the code has been changed for a decade; the "ritual says what it says for a reason" while assuming that the "reason" is not in fact an error.)

If the ritual is the foundation of a Mason's experience, then it behooves us to make the ritual as true and strong and unassailable as possible, and to beware revering the old just because it is old, while remembering that the things we consider justified by age were themselves once innovations.

Regardless, I'm with Ted on this issue.  No Innovations on the
Rituals, please.

If there had been no innovations there would be no formal ritual other than reading the charges.

Rod Larson

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Mike Payne" <mikepayne@indy.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Brothers,
I'm just a simple newbie that looks at *everything* as a symbol for me to ponder, and if I develop some internal behavior or thought that makes me behave just a little bit better toward my fellow man, I've gotten my yearly dues worth.

I find it very interesting that virtually every civilization has "found"
the 47th problem through their own methods, and we could probably spend countless years researching when and where it first started, and what problem it was developed to answer.

Maybe it has been with us since "Time Immemorial"????

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Ken Christianson" <kaicee@earthlink.net>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] 47th problem of Euclid.
Dear Brothers all, Let me see here: Bro. Rod says that he was bothered by parts of the Webb lecture on the 47th problem (actually it is the 47th PROBLEM of Euclid as stated in my original copy of Webb's work) and states that "Almost every statement in the lecture is false ..." . Question: just what part is false and why?  Do you mean that it is historically inaccurate or that as an illusion to the legends used by Freemasonry to represent and illustrate certain ideas it is
incorrect?  Possibly there is a new discovery in mathematical science that has recently come to light which proves that Euclid was wrong?  Ascribing to non-Euclidean geometry (Masonry)?

Since Brother Webb might seem to be at fault here and considering
that he is not actively present to support or deny any challenges to his work, it might serve us well to recall that the title of his work is The Freemason's Monitor; or Illustrations of Masonry .  The book contains no pictures, diagrams or other graphical representations so may we then say that the object of his work was not to "illustrate" the work of the Craft but that it represents the "Illustrations" which the Craft itself uses to communicate it's philosophy.

If this is true, it is an integral part of the teachings of Freemasonry and therefore should not be allowed to be changed at the romantic desires of any of us.  That would be like throwing out the bathwater, the baby and the tub -maybe even the table too- all at once.

Remembering that each of us JOINS Masonry and not that Masonry
joins us, we are told to speculate -to think on our own according to our experiences and backgrounds- in order that we might learn to grow and above all, to change.  If each member was allowed to change the ritual to suit his own interpretation of it, we would only serve to rebuild that Temple of Babel and not the House of Solomon.

Certainly question everything, determine what it is that it means
 to you as an individual but leave it intact so that the next person walking down the path can enjoy the challenge and experience. It is constantly repeated that no ONE member or group of members can speak for or represent the entire Fraternity. Likewise, no single Mason has a lock on the meaning or interpretation of the teachings.   Really.  (Also wouldn't it be most un-Masonic to deny any of the new Brothers the opportunity to learn and expand their knowledge and thereby their own abilities?)

As for the comment of others that standard repetition just puts
members to sleep or sends them on a little "vacation", we might also think of those few Brothers who continually return to Lodge to witness the presentation of the Degrees.  Sure they've heard it a hundred times before, yet there are those most unique individuals who derive a unique lesson from each viewing and/or participation in the ritual.

"Parroting" ?  Sure, that happens all the time and well that it does.  Each of us is an individual and therefore learns in a different way and at different speeds.  That Brother who takes a "temporary mental absence" from the present conditions might just have realized some modicum of insight into a rather vexing personal problem - thus affording him the chance to alter his actions or thoughts in a way that might benefit not only himself, his family and who knows what else.

If we measure only by our own standard all else is sure to come up
either in excess or lacking.  There might just be some reason why Masons are given a gauge as a working tool in the 2nd.  Not only for the passage of time but the passage of mind also.

In his re-writing of the portion of the lecture, might I inquire to Bro. Larson concerning his re-writing of the lecture portion:  (as stated above, Webb wrote that it was the "Forty-seventh Problem of Euclid")  but even this isn't really correct because it was a Proof offered by Euclid to a Theorem ostensibly attributed to Pythagoras. What "Masonic tradition"  do you refer to as attributing the "invention" of Pythagoras?  Did such civilizations such as the Maya use the "theorem" as a "central part of their theories" ? [might it not be the proof of the theorem (attributed to Euclid) that is used rather than the proposition (attributed to Pythagoras) that is used?] .   In what portion of relativity theory and quantum mechanics does the 47th Proposition make it's appearance?

Going on to and important facet of Bro. Larson's statement:  Why
should Masons be inspired to "appreciate the beauties of science and geometry" when the statement of Webb (if we are to use this source as an Authority) is that  "It teaches masons to be general lovers of the arts and sciences."  Also why limit it to only two thousand years?  It is unlikely that Pythagoras (3rd century BCE so  2000) was the originator or true "inventor" of the Proposition, that is only attributed to him by some historians and even then many of them offer doubts.

Common experience is to relate the name Pythagoras to Mathematics and specifically Geometry.  However a look into the subjects that were taught at the school started by Pythagoras of Samos - geometry, music, number theory and astronomy which were supplemented with rhetoric, grammar and logic - just might lead to a more (dare I say it?) Freemasonic connection?

Then there is that other aspect of Pythagoras, but then you know
that one don't you?

Sincerely and Fraternally,   POTS
Ken Christianson*
Glendale, California

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Brothers Graham, Ted & others:
Let us not forget that there is nothing uniform in word and thought
officially from Jurisdiction to Jurisdiction. A letter perfect MM lecture is not the same in the GL of New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, California, Washington DC, Indiana, etc. And certainly not the same in the GL of Western Australia, UGLE, Scotland, etc. 

Don't get hung up on the words or their "truthfulness". We should remember the inner meaning, the "natural" truths we are trying to teach our candidates. They are the important persons that we are attempting to teach, not the old, set in their way Brethren.

Brother Mike Beltzer
Junior Warden
Cuyahoga Falls Lodge #735
GL F&AM of Ohio 

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Veritas_gdl" <grahamlincoln@lycos.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 8:45 AM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Hello, Mike & All

I am simply very concerned about "Innovations," because my first
experience with "Lodge of Instruction" involved a certain guy
teaching in the name of G.L., that "we are all here because of Jesus/
Christianity" and he was, basically preaching Chrisitanity at the
Altar of F&AM...saying that F&AM is based upon Christianity.

The "Holy Bible" is an innovation upon the rituals, and now most
Masons I have met seem to think F&AM is based upon The Holy Bible and Christianity--despite the fact that F&AM is *supposed* to be based upon "Universality" (and, as any Anti-Mason can tell you, we are *supposedly* welcoming of ALL Men of All Religions, Races, Colors, Creeds, etc.--not just White Christian Males).

Because I have seen someone trying to preach their version of
Truth at the Altar of F&AM, I am very concerned about "Innovations." Technically, the Rituals should read "Volume of Sacred Law," Not "Holy Bible."  However....  If people would actually read The Monitor and study a little, they would know that and leaving the discovery to others would be just fine.  Many things were taught to me, that are NOT in the Rituals, after I was raised as an MM (methods of recognition, etc.).  Explaining the meaning of "V.S.L." (Volume of Sacred Law) should be an important element of that teaching.  However, unlike the rest of the Mystery Schools in the world, F&AM has virtually stopped teaching and just gives out titles and the Candidate is on his own....

I find it rather odd that I had to learn about Masonic Libraries
from a NY Mason & John J. Robinson.  Why was I not informed, in the Lodge?

The lack of education in F&AM precludes changing things, at-least
where I live.  The way things are going where I live, Hiram may be
replaced by Jesus or something to that effect.

When people are placed in positions of authority and/or power,
they often use that position to espouse their own theories/rhetoric.

It seems to be a better Idea to collect all of the Monitors (and
Rituals) from every state and every country and put them all together
into one large book, then distribute that book to every Grand Lodge,
with enough copies for each individual Lodge and each MASONIC LIBRARY (including the Scottish Rite Libraries, etc.)....then, after decades of pondering that one book of collected Monitors, the Fraternity as a whole could probably create a wonderful Universal Monitor (and Rituals).

I signed a KY Masons Monitor and it was twice as thick as mine.  I
would LOVE to see such a work in my lifetime.

For now, however, the lack of education in F&AM precludes the
right to start changing things at this time.  Too many people do not
really know enough about the subject to alter the rituals.

The really knowledgable guys should put-together some kind of
Test.  If the test isn't completed with reasonable accuracy, the
person taking the test should have no involvement with altering the
rituals.....  Maybe, in two or three decades the Rituals could be
married, consolidated and "fixed" but, it should be by the consensus of The Fraternity, as a whole, and each G.L. should have say in the matter.   A long, slow process, creating more accurate Rituals--after much Research.

The idea of people making changes on an Individual level is
frightening.

Look at the way the Constitution is being thrown out the window,
as we speak.  Look at the moron down south, with the Ten Commandments in the Courthouse, carved in stone.  That could happen in F&AM as well--destroying the Universality of F&AM.

Numerous men think a person must be a Christian to be a Mason--
which defeats the purpose of the organization.

At this time, the level of Masonic Education (or lack thereof)
should be testament to the fact that we should not change the
Rituals, until we know what we are doing.

Men with interesting ideas, and proposed changes could Submit
their ideas to the collective Council of all G.L.s/Philalethes and
the changes could be voted on.....  Yet, as I said, this process
would take Decades to be accomplished Properly.  I don't think the
G. L.'s have ever operated on this level, but it could be done & would
lead to a more firmly Cemented Society.

Take Care.
Laborare Est Orare,
Graham Douglas Lincoln

Utica #337  /  A.A.S.R. 32° (SMJ)
http://www.geocities.com/veritas_gdl/index.htm
2b1ask1 : http://indianamasons.org
http://www.southernindianamasonry.org/index.html
http://www.kymason.com/aasr/main.htm

"Study The Book of Nature, Brother-it Bears the stamp of Deity."  -
Old Masonic Admonition

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Brother Graham:
Agreed. Amen. So Mote It Be!  
Brother Mike Beltzer,
I have been in Lodge when the name of Jesus Christ has been invoked. And have been told by several Brothers, in Lodge and out, that Masonry is a Christian organization. Being a non-Christian and a Mason for 33 years it rankles me that this occurs, but in the spirit of Freemasonry, I'll only respond to this in private conversation. Note that when a prayer is said in the name of Jesus, it loses much of its meaning to me. The same would be said if appeared in another religious name (Mohamed, Bhudda, etc.).

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Jay Hochberg" <euclid47@earthlink.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 2:04 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: 47th problem of Euclid

Bro. Rod writes:

"The 'Webb' lecture on the 47th Problem... bothered me from the first time I heard it. Almost every statement in the lecture is false and to me did not seem proper for Masonic presentation. Therefore, in my rebellious youth, I wrote the following substitute, which, I think, is both factual and philosphically valid....

"This ancient mathematical theorem was discovered and re-discovered many times during a 2000 year period.... From its ancient use in performing accurate land measurement to its modern appearance in the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics...."

I'm not against editing or modernizing the prose of Masonic ritual, but as a brother I'd urge you to proceed under the rules and regulations of your Grand Lodge.  It's only fair; think of it as intellectual property rights.

Perhaps your ideas should first take the form of a research paper presented in a proper forum or published in an appropriate Masonic periodical.  There it may gain credibility and could take root.

In addition, I'd say that the changes you make should be based on
Freemasonry's founding documents and valid history.  References to quantum mechanics in a monologue that implicitly dates [at least] to the 18th century will confound your audience.  Start with Mackey's "The Legend of Euclid" and from there try various MSS.

In other words, brethren, look to the PAST for clarity.  It's there.

Jay Hochberg
Menorah Lodge, No. 249, F & AM
New Jersey, USA

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: [MasEd] On changing Ritual.

Greetings Brethren,

Here in Utah the Webb lectures aren't used, so I have little or no familiarity with them. I have, however, found that if any innovation is to be made to Ritual it must be done with extreme care.

As an example, we have had a movement to make public the ceremony of constituting a new Lodge. In the current tyled ritual the language includes the statement that the Lodge is "empowered" to perform degrees (i.e. make masons). If the language is "modernized", as has been suggested, some Brother might wish to change that word to "authorized" as having a clearer meaning.
He'd be wrong. To "empower" is literally to give spiritual substance, not just authority. Manna, if you will, cosmic or spiritual power and ability. If we change the Ritual, we may inadvertently remove much of the intended meaning.

I agree that there are errors in our Ritual, and even the prejudices of the past. The FC staircase lecture is certainly anti-Roman, which every Brother who is a Roman Catholic will instantly pick up on, therefore, it is to the Greeks, and not the Romans, to which we owe . 

The Master Mason lecture says that Abraham was about to offer up Isaac as a sacrifice. This is the Jewish and Christian tradition (both coming from the same book), but the Moslem tradition is that Abraham was to offer up Ishmael - his first born son.

If you change the Ritual, and let each Brother change it as he will, pretty soon it's not Ritual at all, the constant repetition being an integral part of it's meaning.

As my Lodge's chaplain, I recently wrote an essay for our newsletter entitled "Why Ritual?". My own graduate education being in psychology and cultural anthropology, I was asked by the Worshipful Master to address this very question. It is available for any who may request it.

Fraternally,
Arthur Reilly, PM
Argenta, Lodge #3; F & AM of Utah

P.S. Pythagorus is said to have sacrificed a "hectatomb" - which is 100 head of oxen, sacrificed according to a particular & precise Greek ritual. ;)

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "E Doyle P" <edoyle40@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: [MasEd] Digest Number 433 47th Problem of Euclid

Brethren:

I’ve read all the posts and answers of other Brethren about the
importance of being “factual” and Truthful in all of the Ritual of our great Fraternity.

I think that you are all right in what you have said, but I don’t think
any one of us should change it on our own but go through the proper channels in our respective Grand lodges to get it changed.
Just a thought!

Ed Piles
PM Gardenville-Cache Lodge #455
HP Oriental Chapter  #78 RAM
St Louis, Mo

* * * * * * * * RESPONSE * * * * * * * *

From: "Steven K. Robison" <srobison@hsonline.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 7:34 PM
Subject: [MasEd] Re: Ritual and Change

One problem in this area MAY BE that the various GLs take a different attitude toward "innovation" in the ritual.

A couple years ago, I undertook a review of Masonic Memorial Services while learning the Indiana Service.  A wide variety of approaches to the Memorial Service was evidenced.  Some Grand Jurisdictions don't have a ritual; some set out a ritual and note that it is the "suggested" ritual for a Memorial Service.  At the extremes appeared to be [and no criticism of either] Ohio and California.

California seemed to say:  "Here is the Memorial Service ritual, and you will not deviate one word from it; further, you will not put it on until you have been certified to do so by a GL official."  

Ohio seemed to say:  "Here are three or four different rituals for Memorial Services that you can use; and, if you don't like any of them, use something else you think is appropriate."

Frat.,
Steven K. Robison, PM
Editor, TrestleBoard
Jackson Lodge #146
Seymour, IN

To subscribe to the Mas-Ed list, send a blank email to:
mased-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To unsubscribe from the Mas-Ed list, send a blank email to:
  mased-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

This website does not speak for the Grand Lodge of Illinois or Freemasonry