Forbidden knowledge - Bigfoot

Forbidden knowledge - Bigfoot

Traduzca esta página al español usar
Traduire Cette Page A Français utilisation
Übersetzen Sie Diese Seite Zu Deutsch Gebrauch

eXTReMe Tracker

Gigantopithecu or Big Foot?

"We need to see clear locomotion to make a decision. That's why the Patterson film is so convincing--muscle movement, and fluid gate."

This photo is from the incredible video shot by Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin in 1967. Both men lived near Yakima, Washington State. Patterson had been involved in the search for the elusive Bigfoot or Sasquatch for many years and had written a book on the subject entitled Do Abonimable Snowmen Of America Really Exist? In this book, he calls attention to the significant amount of evidence that supports the creature's existence. Gimlin, a highly experienced outdoorsman, was a close friend of Patterson and agreed to accompany him on a wilderness expedition to search for the creature.

Equipped with a 16mm hand-held Kodak movie camera, the two searchers set out on horseback in October, 1967 and explored the wilderness regions in northern California. They concentrated their search in the area near Bluff Creek which is in the Six Rivers National Forest. Bluff Creek itself, is about 38 air miles south of the California/Oregon border and 18 air miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. This region was selected because Bigfoot footprints had been found there in prior years. A road was constructed into Bluff Creek in 1957, opening the area, which up to that time had been remote wilderness. Road construction workers noticed large human-like footprints in the soft soil which were reported to the press by Jerry Crew in October, 1958. The word "Bigfoot" was used in the press release and has now become a common name for the creature. Subsequent investigations at that time revealed tracks of six different sizes, indicating that a number of creatures frequented the area. Footprint sizes ranged from 12¼ inches to 17 inches long.

In the early afternoon of October 20, 1967 Patterson and Gimlin spotted a female Bigfoot down on the creek gravel sandbar. Patterson's horse reared in alarm at the sight of the creature, bringing both horse and rider to the ground, Patterson pinned below. Being an experienced horseman, he quickly disengaged himself and grabbed his camera. While running toward the creature, Patterson took 24 feet of colour film footage. During this time, the creature quickly but calmly walked away across the sandbar into the woods. In the meantime, Gimlin observed the whole scene, rifle in hand, in case his friend was attacked by the creature. The men had previously agreed that under no circumstances would they shoot a Bigfoot unless in self-protection. The creature, estimated to be 7 feet 3½ inches in height and weighing 700 pounds, left footprints 14½ inches long by 6 inches wide. In that part of Bluff Creek, there is a sandy clay soil with a blue-gray tinge. This type of soil holds footprints remarkably well for a long period of time.

Fearing a possible confrontation with the creature and perhaps others of its kind, the two men decided not to pursue their prey into the forest. They reasoned that they had photographic evidence of its existence and did not want to put the creature or themselves in jeopardy.

The film has been studied by many scientists throughout the world who continue to remain divided on the authenticity of the sighting. Roger Patterson died in January, 1972 steadfast in his belief in the creature's existence. Robert Gimlin, who now resides in Yakima, also continues to maintain that what he saw was the elusive North American Bigfoot. To this time, no firm evidence has surfaced to cast a doubt on this truly amazing discovery

From: Internet Virtual Bigfoot Conference Digest, 1996, V2 #111. Watch the video at Patterson and see the rest of the story.

Hoax? Watch this video..Patterson Bigfoot and this Enhanced version. and from the National Geographic channel BigFoot

No scientists or qualified experts have ever debunked the Patterson footage. It has never been shown to be fake. On the contrary, every scientist who has studied the footage either says it shows a real, unclassified species, or that a conclusion cannot be made.

Close scrutiny and analysis of the Patterson footage almost always transforms scientific skeptics into supporters for more research into the subject. see Debunking?

Bigfoot sightings in North America began in the early 1800s apparently, though newspapers of that time often printed hoax stories, so one cannot be sure. The first of many bigfoot sightings began with an 1811 account near Jasper, Alberta, Canada by a fur trader by the name of David Thompson. He claimed to have found four-toed, strange footprints in fresh snow. from Bigfoot sightings

"We are seeking comparative images of a skinny, mangy bear, bent over and smelling the ground, as you see in this image. The people we have spoken with so far who have spent a great deal of time with both primates and bears (mainly zoo people) say this figure looks much more like a healthy primate smelling the ground than like a skinny bear smelling the ground.

If the figure is a 'skinny mangy bear' bent over, then it should be fairly easy to replicate with photographs of such. So we are seeking images of a skinny, mangy bear in this same posture? More photos.. Bigfoot Research Org Jacobs photos

This painting shows Adam of the bible covered in hair. Is this how he really was? Accordingly, before Adam eats the forbidden fruit, he is shown as living with and as the animals and wearing no clothes - instead his body is covered with hair.

No other creature on Earth has a soul except man, as God said, men are made in the image of Him, which is pure 'LIGHT' ( Soul ). Humans today take this for granted. Go back and read Genesis again...We think you were created by God. You are not evolved from some ape even if the DNA is similar.

Anthropologists have failed miserably to produce fossil evidence of man's 'missing link' with the apes and there has been a growing recognition of the complexity of organs such as the human brain.

In November 1859, Charles Darwin published a most dangerous idea - that all living things had evolved through a process of natural selection. Although there was almost no mention of mankind in Darwin's treatise.

Darwins co-discoverer Alfred Wallace was less reluctant to express his views. Wallace himself was adamant that 'some intelligent power has guided or determined the development of man'.

But then you have HOMO ERECTUS, which represents a long line of fossils found in eastern Africa, the Middle East and southern and southeastern Asia (where the fossils are called Java Man) from about 1.7 million to 200,000 years ago. Was Java Man really Human?

Is this Adam?

This says, HOMO NEANDERTHALENSIS, which lived from about 250,000 to 30,000 years ago, is the last species to diverge from the human line prior to the emergence of modern humans, and the last species of hominid to have gone extinct. Some experts claim that modern humans and Neandertals shared genes and habitats right up until about 30,000 years ago, but this is a minority view falling ever further into empirical complications. Neandertals The extinction of Neandertals coincides in most geographic regions with the arrival of modern humans and the most recent Ice Age.
But humans did not evolve from these.


Incredible Show. November 9, 2007 -- THE History Channel may have discovered the missing link.

In its new show "MonsterQuest," an adventurous group braved the wilderness to see if "Big Foot" actually lives in Ontario, Canada.

Scientists Kurt Nelson and Jeff Meldrum spent five days with a video and audio crew at a cabin in the utterly remote Snelgrove Lake, pulling DNA samples from the trap and exploring the forest.

The show has caused a stir among enthusiasts because it has gotten so close to proving the Sasquatch monster may, in fact, exist.

The show made "contact" with the thing on its last night of filming.

"A stone was thrown at about 2 a.m.," executive producer Doug Hajibeck told The Post. "That stone hit like a bullet. It was thrown with amazing accuracy."

animated Sasquatch The crew threw a stone back and, in a matter of minutes, a second stone was launched at them.

"I was really scared, and I felt the adrenaline," said Hajibeck. "When we threw that rock into the woods and then it got sent back, my heart raced."

Blood, tissue and hair discovered later on a bear trap outside the cabin was tested.

The hair did not match any known North American bear or animal and tests showed an uncanny similarity to human DNA with one exception: the irregular DNA matched that of a primate.

"It is a show that presents and analyzes the evidence," said executive producer Mike Stiller. "But, ultimately, it's up the viewers. Check your local listings for show times.
History Channel

" I watched with baited breath last night (nov 2007) Monster Quest, Sasquatch Attack in Northen Ontario. The crew were attacked by a stone and log throwing person or Sasquatch on the last night, 200 miles from anyone, at a flyin on a lake. They had some DNA that was about two years old from a board full of galvinized screws to stop predators like bears. The board had the imprint of a large foot unlike a bear. The hair sample was not known. It had no Medulla and had a pointed end. It was not bear nor human. It was unknown. The DNA once isolated from the contaminate of the galvainzed screws and amplified showed itself to be a mutant human at best and something unknown at present."

The chimp DNA Genome vs the Human Genome was off by 5 base pairs in this one sequence. The Sasquatch/Mutant Human DNA was off by 1. They do not know what it is for sure. Mutant human or a true Sasquatch. Since no Sasqutch DNA or Genome is on profile but human mutations are they will continue to culture and investigate. This particular mutation is at present unknown in the population and therefore lends itself to being a interesting year ahead. Could Sasquatch be geneticly more like us then even chimps or gorillas?

They will continue to grow the DNA and amplifiy it for a year and then decide if they have a mutant human DNA or a Sasquatch DNA.

More evidence

The words "yeti" and "abominable snowman" are applied to several types of hairy humanoids similar to North America's Bigfoot, but these creatures are distinct from Bigfoot because they are reported from a different continent altogether. The Himalaya Mountains of Tibet and Nepal are the homeland of these legendary creatures. The two terms "yeti" and "abominable snowman" are sometimes applied to creatures from other remote areas of Asia as well. Cryptozoologists and other serious researchers prefer the term "yeti" over "abominable snowman" because "yeti" sounds more scientific and because it is not based on a mistranslation of a native word, as "abominable snowman" is.

The most picky cryptozoologists refer to each individual type of yeti by its own native name, dzu-teh for the biggest, hulking giants who sometimes walk on all fours and seem half bear, half ape, meh-teh for the "classic" yeti that stands about six feet tall and has a pointed top of the head, and teh-lma for the three-foot-tall frog-eating yeti that makes its home in steamy jungle valleys between mountains (sometimes thought to be a juvenile yeti by researchers).

The teh-lma is the most human-like of the yetis and is thought to be a race of primitive humans by some researchers, compared to the proto-pygmies. It is also the most ignored of the yetis. Very little research has been focused on it recently, although several decades ago, when it was lumped in with the meh-teh more often than not, this little yeti was more in the spotlight. The dzu-teh is thought by many researchers to be a bear. It has claws and carnivorous habits, in addition to its bear-like appearance. However, many cryptozoologists think that, if it is a bear, it must be a new species of bear, because the descriptions don't sound like any known species.

The meh-teh is the subject of the most research, and is the only variety of yeti that most people hear about these days. Whenever you've read about the yeti before, it is likely you were reading about the meh-teh, the classic yeti that sounds most similar to Bigfoot. It looks something like a cross between a gorilla and a man. It could not easily be mistaken for a bear. Even though it has long, shaggy hair, it is actually supposed to be a valley-dweller, like all other varieties of yeti. The snow-capped peaks don't contain enough food for such a creature to live there, but it is said the meh-teh often has to go through high mountain passes to travel from one valley to another, where it becomes highly visible to human observers and sightings are most likely to take place. In its forested, remote valleys, it is supposed to be nearly impossible to locate, living in a remote territory much like the panda, which eluded researchers for sixty years after its discovery.

Even though the yeti (at least the meh-teh) is one of the best documented of the hairy humanoids, it is also one of the most disputed. Native folklore has heavily obscured whatever real animal may lie behind the mythology. According to legend, the yeti is a spiritual being, not an animal. It is sometimes worshipped, attributed with many supernatural powers, and is said to interbreed with humans.

In addition, some legends say that there is no actual breeding population of yetis. Instead, each yeti is actually the transmogrified quasi-solid ghost of a dead human. Other mythology states that the yetis are actually demons that have been assigned to guard mountains, so that humans do not ascend to the peaks and disturb the gods who live there. If this is true, then the yetis have failed miserably in their task to keep people from climbing Mt. Everest.

With western observers involved, the picture can get clouded too. The yeti has been shown to be confused with actual humans, bears and even suggestive-looking rocks on some occasions.

Bigfoot" is a term that is applied in two ways. In its widest sense, it is applied to every type of hairy humanoid from all over the world, regardless of that hairy humanoid's characteristics. In other words, it is a catch-all category that is applied to every variety of legendary ape-man by those who don't know better. In its more correct sense, "Bigfoot" applies to a certain type of hairy humanoid that is frequently reported in the Pacific Northwest area of America (roughly the states of Washington, Oregon and the northern part of California) and also found in similar habitats in western Canada, possibly as far north as Alaska. This type has a relatively stable set of characteristics and is often viewed as the standard Bigfoot.

The standard Bigfoot has a rather consistent appearance. Adults are described as six to nine feet tall, heavily built, and muscular, with large feet and a sagittal crest on top of the head, giving the head a somewhat pointed, elongated look, like a bullet. The forehead itself is generally sloping, suggesting a brain that has more in common with apes (or very primitive men) than modern humans. The entire body is covered with thick, shaggy fur of about the same length, without longer hair on the head. The body shape is often compared to a professional football player or a bodybuilder, with large muscles and a solid physique. Footprints measure fifteen inches long on average, with five toes. Behavior towards humans can be aggressive, but is seldom anything worse than a threat display.

The creatures are often sighted in family groups, with arrangements that would suggest they seem to follow the human rule of pair-bonding with one male and one female staying together to raise their young. They seldom use tools more sophisticated than a branch, do not wear clothing, and cannot speak, although they have a wide variety of calls that might count as language to another Bigfoot. They seem to be highly nomadic, occasionally sheltering in caves, but seeming to not stay in one area longer than a night or two. Those who believe in them think that their diet is probably mostly plant food such as tender leaves and acorns, along with some meat sources such as snails, frogs and scavenged deer carcasses.

This standard Bigfoot is not the only hairy humanoid to be reported from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Other beings that do not fit the standard model are also sighted, including true giants, marked hominids and many types of BHMs (big hairy monsters) of a decidedly paranormal character.

In recent years, the efforts of serious cryptozoologists to make the discipline sound more respectable has led many to discard the term "Bigfoot" as unscientific, replacing it with sasquatch. Some other researchers use "Bigfoot" for standard Bigfoot reports from the Pacific Northwest and reserve "sasquatch" for the Canadian Bigfoot. However, in general the two terms can be used interchangably.

Hairy humanoids are roughly human in form, but are largely or wholly covered in fur or hair. In other words, most of these creatures could be broadly described as ape-men. The most famous hairy humanoid is Bigfoot, but there are countless other cousins of Bigfoot found in legends and sightings from around the world.

Some people use the term "Bigfoot" for any type of hairy humanoid from any place in the world, but the proper use of "Bigfoot" restricts the term to creatures supposed to live in North America.

The Race of Giants - Gigantopithecu

Anthropoligists have also found a race of giants. But these giants are not human. They have tried to connect these with humans stating that they are our ancestors. WRONG!

The Jawbone and teeth of an adult modern human man on the right compared to that of a male Gigantopithecus on the left. Teeth and jaws range from twice to four times the size of the 'modern man's'.
Was There a War Between the Els (Human Giants) and The Reptilian Civilizations of Long Ago. Some Believe that There was a conflict of this kind in Ancient Times which drove the Reptilian Civilization deep into the Inner Earth or back to where they originated from ...Alpha Draconis and/or Altair in the Constellation Aquila. This conflict or war was a Species War between the Evadamic Seed and the "Serpent/Draconian" Seed.

Some believe that the Giants were closely allied with a race of Pre-Scandinavian Nordics who live within the Earth, in what is mythologically known as Agharti or 'Shambhala'. The Giants are defined as 'Els' based on the mythed 'EL-der Race, a human branch tied-in with the Evadamic heritage, having a very tall stature averaging from 9-12 ft. in height.

However, the Reptilian Race, not to be confused with the El Race also has been described as tall in stature and are very anti-human wishing once again to take control over the human race...if not annihilate it all together. The Reptilian also has the capabilities to 'Shape-Shift' ..or manipulate the mind into creating an impression of appearing human.

The Assyrian texts, places emphasis on the number seven to the Goddess-worshipping societies, which in ancient text, refer to seven gateways. The ancient civilizations most often had seven gateways leading into their cities.

It is also interesting to note that there are seven electronic layers around the atomic proton, recalling the sevenfold planetary system and its metallic correspondences,.the music scales, colors, etc. Let us then add to this the seven fundamental constants: E, charge of the electron; G, constant of gravitation; M, mass of the proton; H, Planck's constant; C speed of light; G constant of gravitation; A, cosmmological constant. The evidence strongly suggests that this early culture was very much aware and did use physics and the science of genetics. Giant skeletons

"You must completely destroy all the places where the nations you dispossess have served their gods, on high mountains, on hills, under any spreaking tree; you must tear down their altars, smash their pillars, cut down their sacred poles, set fire to the carved images of their gods and wipe out their name from that place" (Deut. 12:2,3)

Do you want more proof that the Children of the Giant 'Anakim' still lived on Earth in the time of Saul and David?.. Nm:13:32:, Nm:13:33:, Deuteronomy 2:19, Dt:2:20, Dt:2:21:, Dt:2:22:, 1Sm:17:4:, 1Sm:17:71, 2Sm:21:18, Chr:20:4:, 1Chr:20:5:, CHR 20: 4-8, 1Chr:20:6:, 1Chr:20:7:, 1Chr:20:8:,

Although these are clearly 'giant gorillas' scientists try to link them to humans. As our story unfolds, you will see that that isn't possible.

"Gigantopithecus was in the landscape with homo erectus up until 300,000 years ago, at a time when humans were undergoing a major evolutionary change. Guangxi province in southern China, where the Gigantopithecus fossils were found, is the same region where some believe the modern human race originated." and see.. The discovery

Believers in the existence of the Yeti or "Abominable Snowman" and Bigfoot have theorized that these creatures could be present-day specimens of G. blacki. Without additional evidence, this must be regarded as highly speculative.

Due to the likelihood that G. blacki co-existed with anatomically modern H. sapiens, it is possible that encounters with the creatures over a hundred thousand years ago may have become, through oral tradition, the legends about the Yeti or Bigfoot still passed around today (Park, 177-178).

There was a race or group of people found in Australia called "meganthropus" by anthropologists. These people were of very large size — estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read. These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humanness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of "gigantopithecus blacki" — named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds.

Most cryptozoological explanations for them fit in three categories. Some think these creatures are missing links, other researchers think they are primates, and yet others think they are primitive humans. In the "primates" camp, the presumably extinct giant ape Gigantopithecus has become a favorite candidate. In the "primitive humans" camp, Neanderthal man is the favored explanation for hairy humanoid sighting

Another giant race called 'Paranthropus robustus' was originally discovered in Southern Africa in 1938. The development of P. robustus, namely in cranial features, seemed to be aimed in the direction of a "heavy-chewing complex". Because of the definitive traits that are associated with this robust line of australopithecine, anthropologist Robert Broom erected the genus Paranthropus and placed this species into it.

Mystery Primates vs. Big Hairy Monsters

In addition to the three main kinds of explanations, there are two main classifications for these cryptids. One category contains all the more tame, normal specimens that have some respectability in the eyes of science, while the other category contains all the weird things that seem supernatural, out of place, or just plain silly.

The more respectable category includes Bigfoot, the yeti and other ape-men that seem biologically plausible. These beings typically live in remote areas such as the Pacific Northwest of America or the Himalaya Mountains of Tibet, areas where it is at least somewhat believable that a large mammal could go undiscovered. They usually have footprints with five toes, and they seem to generally behave in ways that a biological animal ought to behave.

The second category includes a wide assortment of less plausible creatures that are collectively referred to as "hairy bipeds" (HB for short) or "big hairy monsters" (BHM for short). BHMs are often found in heavily populated areas, places where few scientists expect that large mammals could live undetected. BHMs frequently act in ways that we would not expect from real ape-men, such as wearing absurd bits of clothing. They often have ghostly or paranormal characteristics, such as glowing red eyes, the ability to walk through solid objects, or the ability to suddenly vanish. Like hallucinations, they are often bulletproof. In addition, they often present physical features that are biologically absurd, such as being the size of an elephant, having only three toes, or combining the usual ape-man look with a wolf's head, a goat's legs, or a fishy tail. A good example of an HB or BHM is the headless big hairy monster that has been associated with Mothman sightings. An animal that lacks a head is the pinnacle of biological absurdity.

BHMs are more often investigated by paranormal researchers and ignored by mainstream scientists, while the more respectable varieties of hairy humanoids such as Bigfoot are the subject of much scientific debate and draw more research money to their cases.
see..The Cryptid Zoo: Hairy Humanoids

"Missing link" is a term used for the one or more species of ape-men presumed to exist somewhere in the fossil record in order to complete the evolutionary chain between the more intelligent, bipedal apes such as Gigantopithecus and the earliest primitive species of humans. For many years, researchers have suggested that Bigfoot or hairy humanoids in general may represent one or more surviving "missing link" species.

The fossil record as a whole is rather spotty, so most scientists don't think that the missing "missing link" fossils present any real problem or challenge to the theory that humans evolved from apes. There are presumably countless individual species that we will never find fossils of.

Recently, the idea has surfaced that the hominid/primate fossil record is complete enough that we don't need to look anymore for a missing link. Many scientists today think that there is no real gap between the most intelligent apes in the fossil record and the most primitive types of people in the fossil record. Along with this idea, explanations for Bigfoot and his fellow creatures have shifted in two directions: some researchers favor the idea that Bigfoot is a bipedal ape instead of an ape-man, while others favor the suggestion of a primitive, very hairy human such as Homo erectus. A rare few researchers favor the idea that hairy humanoids are hybrids of some sort, such as the humanzee or possibly hybrids between humans and neanderthals.

What we have here is scientific evidence that these creatures exist. However there are several different types of bigfoot. That means several attempts to produce a 'worker' that could be controlled and do what it's told were made by the Anunnaki. Apparently these were to ape-like and they escaped into the wild hundreds of thousands of years ago. Once again the Anunnaki theory is the only one that fits.

Some of the text on this page is copyright 2006 by Jamie Hall. Please use proper citation if you are using this website for research.

Back to Forbidden forward 1

View My Guestbook Sign My Guestbook


Get free counter at

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" -- Albert Einstein