
History Of Freemasonry
In Ohio
From 1791 to 1912
by W. M. Cunningham and John
G. Reeves
THE HISTORY OF THE MOST WORSHIPFUL GRAND LODGE
OF FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS OF THE STATE
OF OHIO AND ITS PIONEER LODGES
From 1808 To 1844
INCLUSIVE
By W. M. CUNNINGHAM, M. A.,
Past Grand Master F.& A M., P. G. H. P. of Royal Arch
Masons, P. G. M. of R. and S. Masters, and
S. G. I. G. 33° Grand Historian.

VOLUME 1
Part IV
Copyright, 1914 By J. H. Bromwell Grand Secretary
Cincinnati, Ohio
CHARITY LODGE NO. 53 SUNBURY, DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was granted for the formation
of Charity Lodge No. -, May 28, 1819, and its charter was issued in
December, 1821. Its first officers were Brothers B. B. Chapman, W. M.;
Fleazer Copeland, S. W.; Jabez P. Manning, J. W., and Lawrence Myers,
Secretary.
Its existence was terminated in 1828 and
its number yet remains vacant.
MILFORD LODGE NO. 54 MILFORD, CLERMONT
COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was issued for the organization
of Milford Lodge No. -, at Milford, Clermont County, December 17, 1819,
with Brothers Silas Smith, W. M.; William Williams, S. W.; and Zacheus
Biggs as J. W. Its charter, dated December 15, 1820, was granted by
the Grand Lodge at its session on December 12th of that year.
Its existence was loyally maintained throughout
the trying period of anti-Masonic persecutions; of its early members
may be mentioned the names of Brothers Thomas Band, William Williams,
L. A. Hendrick, W. Highlands, Darius Penn, Abel Ross, and Joseph Hull.
The Reverend Thomas J. Melish, honored
as Grand Chaplain by Masonic Grand Bodies in Ohio, was for a number
of years its Worshipful Master. M.·. W.·. Brother William
B. Melish, Past Grand Master of Masons in Ohio, was made a Mason in
Milford Lodge, and the late Brother John M. Pattison, Governor of Ohio,
was also a member of that lodge.
With 180 members upon its roll, it is one
among the prosperous and conservative lodges of this Grand Jurisdiction.
EASTERN STAR LODGE NO. 55 OF FRANKLIN,
WARREN COUNTY, OHIO
On December 13, 1819, the M.·. W.·.
Grand Lodge of Ohio ordered that a dispensation should be issued to
Brothers William C. Schenck, W. M.; James Lanier, S. W.; Garret A. Schenck,
J. W., and others for the organization of Eastern Star Lodge No.-, at
Franklin, Warren County.
The dispensation was issued December 17,
1819.
At the Annual Communication in 1820, Eastern
Star Lodge was represented by Brother Thomas L. Payne and was granted
a charter, which was issued December 20, 1820. Brothers James Lanier,
James Robinson, and Jesse Corwin were among its early representatives
in Grand Lodge.
Eastern Star Lodge was authorized to meet
alternately at Franklin and Miamisburg.
Its Historian, W. Brother N. A. Hamilton,
states that "During the period of anti-Masonic Crusade, 1831 to
1838, no Masters were elected nor meetings held."
In 1832 Eastern Star Lodge was represented
in Grand Lodge by Brother M.·. W.·. Ward, and was not
again represented in Grand Lodge until in 1842; ten years later it was
represented by its Worshipful Master, Brother Absalom Death, first elected
in 1838, who subsequently became quite prominent in Masonic affairs
in Southern Ohio.
The Committee on Charters and Dispensations,
at the Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge held at Lancaster in
October, 1842, reported that Eastern Star Lodge No.55 of Franklin, Warren
County, had resumed its labors without any authority from the Grand
Lodge, "a departure from the landmarks of the order, such as, if
permitted to pass without notice, might he drawn in as a precedent,
and be productive of most pernicious consequences. The committee are
gratified at the assurance, however, which has been given them, that
(with the exception of the irregularity noted) the work of said lodge,
since its resumption, has been such as will be conducive to the general
interests of the Craft. The committee recommend that said lodge be permitted
to continue its labors under its charter, and that its representative
be permitted to take his seat as a member of the Grand Lodge at its
present Communication, on payment of the Grand Lodge dues which have
accrued since October, 1841."
Since that period Eastern Star Lodge has
continued its labors. W. Brother J. D. Miller, one of its members, was
for many years a District Lecturer in the Second Masonic District. This
lodge now has 121 members enrolled.
KING SOLOMON'S LODGE NO. 56 OF ELYRIA,
LORAIN COUNTY, OHIO
Brother P. H. Boynton in his historical
report of this lodge briefly states that "King Solomon's Lodge
No.56 F. & A. Masons was organized originally under a dispensation
granted by Grand Master Chester Griswold, dated December 20, 1819, and
that a charter was granted in December, 1821.
"Both dispensation and charter were
granted to Heman Fly, W. M.; Jabez Burrell, S. W., and John Reading,
J. W.
"Labor ceased in this lodge from 1828,
doubtless from the strong anti-Masonic feeling engendered by the Morgan
excitement.
"In 1847 an application of the Hon,
Eber W. Hubbard and others for permission to resume labor under its
charter was rejected by the Grand Lodge.
"The charter, however, with its old
name and number was finally restored to King Solomon's Lodge, September
26, 1848, to Brothers Eber W. Hubbard, W M.; Ozias Long, S. W., and
Ansel Keith, J. W. Other petitioners were Brothers Robert McEachron,
John T. Hotchkiss, Milton Chapman, Elijah Parker, and Ira Tillotson.
"This old charter under which it resumed
labor was burned up in a fire which destroyed the lodge room March 15,
1873, and the present charter was granted October 22, 1873, to John
W. Hulbert, W. M.; George F. Sloat, S. W., and S. W. Moon, J. W.
"In this last charter it is provided
that the rank and precedence of King Solomon's Lodge in the Grand Lodge
and elsewhere shall be from December 20, 1819."
One among the most prominent members of
King Solomon's Lodge was the late Hon. Brother Heman Fly, prominent
in affairs of State and for several years R. F. Grand Commander of Knights
Templars of Ohio and also for many years Treasurer General of the Supreme
Council 33 of the Ancient and Accepted Rite of the Northern Jurisdiction
of the United States.
King Solomon's Lodge is now one of the
most prosperous lodges in the Jurisdiction of Ohio, having a membership
of 344.
LANCASTER LODGE NO. 57 OF LANCASTER,
FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO
M..·. W.·. Brother John Snow,
Grand Master of Masons in Ohio, on January 15, 1820, issued a dispensation
for the organization of a lodge at Lancaster, Fairfield County, with
Brothers James Wilson, W. M.; Charles R. Sherman, S. W., and Jacob D.
Dietriek, J. W.
In the very interesting history of Lancaster
Lodge No.57, written by W. Brother L. T. Unks, their able Historian,
it is stated that the lodge was organized under its dispensation on
January 18, 1820, and in addition to the officers named the following
Brethren participated in its organization: C. Ring, Treasurer; Nath
C. Gilman, Secretary; L. Ring, S. D.; A. Sawyer, J. D.; H. B. Joy, Tyler,
and six others.
As customary at that period, the lodge
was first opened in the Entered Apprentice's Degree, in which the business
affairs of the lodge were usually transacted.
Among the first petitions to be made a
Mason, presented at that meeting, was the petition of Gotlieb Steinman,
in after years a very prominent Mason in that locality.
The earnestness with which the pioneer
Brethren of Lancaster entered upon their labors is in evidence, as whilst
under dispensation, "In February of 1820, Grand Master Snow came
to Lancaster for the purpose of lecturing the Brethren, and was present
at the meetings of February 5th, 11th, and 13th. The appreciation of
the Brethren is shown in the following resolution:
'Resolved: That the thanks of this lodge be given the Most Worshipful
Grand Master, John Snow, for the kind and obliging manner in which he
has attended for some days past to the instruction of the Brethren in
the principles and lectures of Masonry; and that we shall ever feel
grateful for the essential services rendered us by him.'"
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge held at Columbus, December 12, 1820, a charter was granted to
Lancaster Lodge No.57 of Lancaster. The charter was issued and dated
December 15, 1820, and the lodge was constituted under its charter on
St. John's Day, December 27, 1820. In the history by Brother Unks, it
is stated that "They assembled at their hall at 10 o'clock A. M.,
and after approving the minutes of the night before, 'the Grand Lodge
of Ohio was received with due honors.' "
"The lodge was then conducted to the
house appropriate for the purpose, where the officers were publicly
installed and the lodge constituted in ample form. After enjoying a
satisfactory address from Brother Sherman, the Craft were called to
refreshment, and at evening repaired to their hall, where the lodge
was closed in harmony at 5 o'clock."
Not having a satisfactory lodge room it
is stated that "during the year of 1824 the market house and town
hall was built, on the northern end of which the Masons built their
hall. This they did by generous donations of the Brethren and from other
citizens who were friendly to the fraternity."
On St. John's Day, December 27, 1824, the
hall was dedicated in ample form by the Grand Master, M.·. W.·.
Brother Charles R. Sherman. "Lancaster Lodge met in this hall from
1824 to 1868, and in all that time there were only a few meeting nights
when they did not have a quorum. This is remarkable when we take into
consideration the anti-Masonic period, which extended from 1826 to 1840.
During all these years when, Masons all over the country were afraid
to attend their lodges, Lancaster Masons were unmolested."
The dedication of their next place of meeting,
a hall in the Rising Building, was an unusually elaborate affair, costing
perhaps eight hundred dollars or over. Of it Brother Unks says: "At
11 o'clock A. M. on June 24, 1868, the Masons formed a procession on
South Broad Street. The Grand Lodge was then received by marching through
the lines. They then marched through the principal streets of the city
to the grove north of Mt. Pleasant. After a prayer by the Grand Chaplain,
Past Grand Master M.·. W.·. Brother W. J. Reese, proxy
for Grand Master Howard Matthews, performed the dedication services.
At the close of the services M.·. W.·. Brother Reese delivered
an address. The Masons and their families then had dinner served to
them in the grove. After dinner Grand Orator Mills Gardener, of Washington
C. H., addressed the Brethren, after which they returned to the city,
the Grand Lodge closing in the old market house and the lodge in their
new hall in the Rising Block."
Of Past Grand Master M.·. W.·.
Brother Charles R. Sherman, he says: "Judge C. R. Sherman, first
Senior Warden and second Master of Lancaster Lodge, was born at Norwalk,
Conn., September 17, 1788. He came to Lancaster with his wife and child
in 1811, making most of the journey on horseback. He was the father
of General William T. Sherman and Senator John Sherman. He served as
Grand Master and Grand High Priest. He was an able lawyer and jurist.
In 1823 he was elected a Judge of the Supreme Court of Ohio."
Of Past Grand Master M.·. W.·.
Brother William W. Irvin, Brother Unks says: "The honorable William
W. Irvin was born April 5, 1779, and died March 28, 1842. He was the
third Master of Lancaster Lodge and Grand Master in 1825. He was much
respected as a citizen and honored with a seat in Congress and on the
bench of the Supreme Court of Ohio. The lodge officiated at his funeral."
Of another eminent Mason and Past Grand
Master he says: "William J. Reese, Master of Lancaster Lodge from
1831 to 1838, inclusive, was born in Philadelphia, August 3, 1804, and
died December 16, 1883. In 1834 he was elected Grand Master, to which
position he was contentiously elected until 1842. He served as Grand
High Priest; was elected President of the Council of High Priests, and
was Most Illustrious Grand Master of the Grand Council. He was also
General Grand Generalissimo of the General Grand Encampment K. T. of
the United States."
Of this distinguished Mason, Brother Unks
says further: "W. J. Reese was to my mind the most striking character
that ever appeared in Masonry in Ohio. He was tall, with a military
bearing and graceful diction, besides possessing a fine education, a
perfect gentleman of the old school. Immediately after he was raised
in 1828 he became active in the lodge.
"It is little wonder that the Grand
Lodge selected this fascinating man to preside over them so often during
those dark days of the political anti-Masonic period. During all those
dark years he traveled up and down the State, nourishing the tottering
lodges with his presence and counsel, until at last he had the satisfaction
of seeing many of them in a flourishing condition."
Of Past Grand Master M.·. W.·.
Brother Michael Z. Kreider, another eminent member of Lancaster Lodge,
he says: "M. Z. Kreider, Master in 1844, was born in Pennsylvania
in 1803. He received the Masonic degrees in Lancaster Lodge during the
months of January, February, and March of 1831."
"He was Grand Master in 1847, 1848,
and 1849. At the organization of the Grand Commandery, in October, 1843,
he was elected Grand Commander, which office he held two years. He was
a true type of the self made man, a physician and surgeon of acknowledged
ability throughout the State, who still found time to devote to the
healing of souls as a local preacher. Few men have been able to overcome
the difficulties of life so successfully as Brother Kreider."
The history of Lancaster Lodge, prepared
by Brother L. T. Unks, as may be inferred, is of much interest in its
pioneer reminiscences and biographies, and will doubtless have due prominence
in the lodge histories to follow the History of the Grand Lodge.
Among the names of many other members of
Lancaster Lodge not hereinbefore mentioned, who have received Masonic
honors, may be mentioned two Past Deputy Grand Masters, the late R.·
. W.· . Brothers Philemon Beecher and Dr. Philip M. Wagenhals;
Past Grand High Priest the late Brother James Gates; and of recent times,
Past District Lecturer W. Brother Thomas C. Coates and W. Brother John
G. Reeves, an Honorary 33d of the A. & S. Scottish Rite N. M. J.
U. S.
Lancaster Lodge No.57 now has one among
the best arranged and commodious Masonic Temples in Ohio, dedicated
by Grand Master George D. Copeland in 1908. It also has a fine Masonic
library, to which the zealous Brethren of Lancaster are constantly making
additions.
The membership of Lancaster Lodge No.57 in 1908 was 236.
MEDINA LODGE NO. 58 OF MEDINA, MEDINA
COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was issued to Brothers Abram
Freese, Rufus Ferris, and Seth Blood for the establishment of a lodge
in Medina Village, Medina County.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge in December, 1820, a charter was granted to Medina Lodge No.58,
which was issued December 23, 1820, with Brothers Rufus Ferris, W. M.;
Seth Blood, S. W.; Abraham Scott, J. W.; John Briggs, Secretary; Jason
Hubbell, S. D.; Julius Chidester, J. D.; Lathrop Seymour and Ransom
Clark, Stewards.
The lodge ceased to exist in 1828, and
in 1831 it was reported in the list of delinquent lodges. In this connection
the Grand Lodge record states that it was forced "to yield to the
maddened frenzy of popular excitement," and that upon the death
of its Secretary, the Honorable John Freese, its books and papers fell
"into the hands of its enemies, and the charter was either "lost
or destroyed." In 1843, upon presentation of these facts with a
petition for its resuscitation, the Grand Lodge in Annual Communication
at Lancaster, October 20th, ordered that a new charter be issued to
Medina Lodge No.58, with the rank and precedence of its old name and
number, with Brothers David Wood, W.M.; Ezra D. Brown, S. W. and Charles
Linn, J. W. In 1844 it was represented in Grand Lodge by Brother W.
R. Chidester, in 1845 by Brother John A. Rettig, in 1846 by Brother
A. Morton, and in 1847 and 1848 by Brother A. Davis.
In the spring of 1849 its charter was stolen
whilst the lodge was in attendance at a Masonic funeral, and was never
recovered. At the Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge in October,
1849, a new charter was granted to Medina Lodge No.58, with former rank
and number.
Two of its members, Brothers A. G. Blake
and F. O. Phillips, were members of Congress from that district.
Since that period Medina Lodge has maintained
a substantial existence and now numbers 122 members.
NEW PHILADELPHIA LODGE NO. 59 OF
NEW PHILADELPHIA, TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge, December 13, 1819, it was ordered that a dispensation should
be issued for the establishment of a lodge at New Philadelphia, Tuscarawas
County, "conformably to the petition of Wright Warner, James Clark,
James Galbraith, and others." In accordance therewith a dispensation
was accordingly issued March 1, 1820. At the Annual Meeting of the Grand
Lodge in 1820 no mention was made of New Philadelphia Lodge, U. D.,
hut at the Annual Session of December 10, 1821, it was voted that New
Philadelphia Lodge No.59 was entitled to a charter.
In the excellent history of this lodge
by its octogenarian Historian, W. Brother Upton C. Deardorf, it is stated
that the charter of New Philadelphia Lodge No. 59 was issued December
21, 1821, to Brothers "Wright Warner, W. M.; Jabez Clark, S. W.;
James Galbraith, J. W.; Steven Shank, Thorton Whitaker, John B. Sapington,
George W. Canfield, Alexander McGowan, and William Blickensderfer."
After the brief period of but a few years
the lodge ceased to exist in 1828.
On the 24th of February, 1845, the Grand
Master, M.·. W.·. Brother William B. Thrall, issued a
dispensation to Brothers Wright Warner, Matthias Collier, Jacob S. Sterling,
Walter M. Blake, Isaac Hartman, S. Brainerd, J. B. Parish, and John
Wilkinson to organize Tuscarawas Lodge No. -, at Dover, Tuscarawas County.
At the annual Meeting of the Grand Lodge
held at Columbus on October, 1845, the Committee on Charters and Dispensations
reported that the proceedings ab by-laws of Tuscarawas Lodge U. D.,
were in accordance with Grand Lodge requirements, and that the petitioner
desired to be rehabilitated under the old charter of New Philadelphia
Lodge No.59 only changing its name and location.
In accordance with the action of New Philadelphia
Lodge at the time its labors ceased, "the application is based
upon the following resolution of said Lodge, adopted February 16, 1828,
to wit: Resolved, That this do now adjourn, and stand adjourned,
until convened by the order of the M.·. W.·. Grand Master
of the Grand Lodge of Ohio; and that the secretary of this lodge communicated
this resolution to the Secretary of the Grand Lodge.'
"This resolution was communicated
to the Grand Secretary, and the lodge has never been required by the
Grand Master to resume its labors. They were driven form the field by
the intolerant spirit of anti-Masonry, their charter and jewels stolen,
themselves persecuted and denounced. They bore the blast with patience
and firmness, and have since recovered their jewels. The sound of the
gavel is again heard, and the ancient and honorable institution is again
preforming its office. Your committee therefore recommend the adoption
of the following resolution:
"Resolved, That the Brethren of Tuscarawas
Lodge No.-- be permitted to resume labor, under the charter of New Philadelphia
Lodge No.59, and that the fee if fifty dollars, deposited for dispensation,
be refunded."
On October 24, 1845, a charter was therefore
issued to Tuscarawas Lodge No.59 of Dover (now Canal Dover) with its
name, number, and rank replacing the former New Philadelphia Lodge No.59.
Its officers under its charter were Brothers Wright Warner, W. M.; J.
F. S. Holstine, S. W., and J. M. Simmeral, J. W.
Brother Joseph Medill, the founder of the
Chicago Tribune and eminent as a journalist and editor, was made a Mason
in Tuscarawas Lodge.
Brother U. C. Deardorf, the Historian of
Tuscarawas Lodge, is doubtless the oldest Mason in that county, having
been made a Master Mason in 1849. His vigorous and interesting sketch
of Freemasonry in that county was written in 1906 in his seventy-ninth
year, and his labors are doubtless fully appreciated by his Brethren.
Since its re-establishment in 1845, Tuscarawas
Lodge No.59 has had a healthy, harmonious existence and now has 103
members.
CANTON LODGE NO. 60 CANTON, STARK
COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was issued for the establishment
of Canton Lodge No.-, at Canton, Stark County, in December, 1820, by
order of the Grand Lodge at its Annual Communication, December 12, 1820,
and was instituted March, 1821. The petitioners were Brothers "James
Drennan, Orin Pitkin, James W. Lathrop, and others." A year later,
at the Annual Meeting of the Grand Lodge on December 11, 1821, it was
voted a charter by the Grand Lodge, which was issued December 12, 1821.
Its first officers under its charter were
Brothers Moses Andrews, W. M.; James Drennan, S. W., and Bradley C.
Goodwill, J. W.
Brother James W. Lathrop was one of its
frequent representatives in Grand Lodge. Until 1832 Canton Lodge was
represented at every Annual Meeting of the Grand Lodge. In 1832, 1835,
1836, 1837, and 1838 it was not represented, and the lodge roster states
that work was suspended in 1837 and 1838.
In 1839 Canton Lodge No. 60 was represented
in Grand Lodge by Brother John Sala, and at that Annual Meeting, on
motion of Brother Hines, it was "Resolved, That Canton Lodge No.60
be exonerated from paying any dues prior to June, 1838."
In 1840 Brother John Sala was again the
representative in Grand Lodge. In 1841 it was represented by Brother
John Harris. In 1842, 1843, and 1845 the lodge was not represented.
In 1844 it was represented by Brother John P. Worstell, and in 1846
by Brother David Gotshall. Since which time Canton Lodge has continued
its conservative, loyal, and prosperous existence.
Brother C. L. Hiner, District Lecturer
of the Twentieth District, is an honored member of Canton Lodge No.60.
Its membership is 385.
BETHEL LODGE NO. 61 OF BETHEL, CLERMONT
COUNTY, OHIO
Bethel Lodge, U. D., was granted a dispensation
December 11, 1820, and chartered December 12, 1821.
The petitioners for the lodge were Brothers
"George A. Troutwine, Jonathan D. Morris, John A. Smith, and overs."
The Brethren named were also the first officers under its charter.
This lodge has evidently not been a believer
in the modern fad of rotation in office, as from its organization under
its charter until 1900 but sixteen Brethren were found necessary to
fill the office of Worshipful Master. Prior to 1850, Brothers George
J. Troutwine, Jonathan Vandike, John Quinlan, Nelson B. Beale, John
F. Morris, J. A. Perrine, R. M. Sinks, Temple C. Sargent, and A. Glasgow
served as its Worshipful Masters. From its organization until 1840 there
were but four years in which it was not represented in Grand Lodge.
Loyally and quietly "pursuing the even tenor of its way,"
it was not disturbed by the anti-Masonic persecutions rife in many other
localities, at least they seem to have been unheeded as would be inferred.
One of the most eminent, perhaps, among
its members was Brother Jesse R. Grant, the honored father of General
U. S. Grant.
The jurisdiction of Bethel Lodge is somewhat
restricted, but it has a membership of seventy-nine.
ST. JEROME LODGE NO. 62 CHAGRIN,
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was issued for the establishment
of St. Jerome Lodge in March, 1821, and at the Annual Communication
of the Grand Lodge at Columbus, commencing on January 13, 1823, a charter
was voted to St. Jerome Lodge No.62 at Chagrin. The name and number
of St. Jerome No.62 and Evergreen Lodge No.63 seem to have been frequently
confused in the Grand Lodge Annals. St. Jerome Lodge No.62 ceased to
work in 1828, and its name and number are vacant upon the Grand Lodge
roll.
EVERGREEN LODGE NO. 63 OF SALEM,
ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
On March 17, 1821, a dispensation was issued
for the organization of a lodge at Salem, Ashtabula County, and the
Grand Lodge on December 12, 1821, granted it a charter. No mention is
made either of the names of petitioners or charter members. In 1824
the lodge was represented in Grand Lodge by Samuel Wheeler, subsequently
elected Grand Master. In 1825 and l826 the name of its representative
is not given. In 1827, however, it was represented by the Honorable
Joshua R. Giddings. Its existence ceased in 1828 and the name and number
remain vacant.
MT. VERNON LODGE NO. 64 NORWALK,
HURON COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was granted to Brothers
Timothy Baker, W. M.; Platt Benedict, S. W., and John D. Hoskins, J.
W., in April, 1821, for the formation of a lodge at Norwalk, Huron County.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge in 1821, on December 12th, a charter was granted to Mt. Vernon
Lodge No.64 of Norwalk, Huron County. No historical summary having been
furnished by the lodge, it is impossible to give the names of charter
members or of the officers under its charter.
In 1824 it was represented in Grand Lodge
M.·. W.·. Brother Harvey G. Moore; Brothers Timothy Baker
and Platt Benedict also, at different times, represented Mt. Vernon
Lodge. In 1828 Brothers Theodore Baker and Benjamin Carmon represented
the lodge in Grand Lodge.
In 1833 M.·. W.·. Brother Timothy Baker, of Mt. Vernon
Lodge No. 64, was elected Grand Master of Masons in Ohio.
Although situated in a part of the State
in which the bigotry, slanders, and persecutions of the promoters and
followers of the anti-Masonic crusade had full sway, yet Mt. Vernon
Lodge No.64 maintained its dignified, loyal, and continued existence
throughout the dark days of American Freemasonry. The influence of the
venerable Platt Benedict, one of the charter members of that lodge,
who was a personage of much note in civil and Church affairs in that
part of the State, and who was frequently an honored representative
of Mt. Vernon Lodge in Grand Lodge, doubtless had much to do with the
continuous autonomy of that lodge. Whilst the ability and influence
of Brother Benedict were always recognized in Grand Lodge, yet he evidently
was not possessed of any official aspirations therein, as otherwise
any such would have doubtless received hearty and prompt recognition
at the hands of the Brethren of the Grand Lodge by whom he was much
beloved.
Mt. Vernon Lodge No.64 is one of the prosperous
and harmonious lodges of the State and has a membership of 245.
NEW LISBON LODGE NO. 65 OF LISBON,
COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO
January 21, 1821, a dispensation was issued
to Brothers George McCook, W. M.; Elderkin Potter, S. W.; Andrew Icion,
J. W., and others for the organization of New Lisbon Lodge No. -, at
Lisbon, Columbiana County.
It was chartered January 16, 1823, with
the officers as named in the dispensation.
Brothers Fisher A. Blocksom and J. Rollin
were among its early representatives in Grand Lodge. In 1835, 1836,
and 1837 the lodge was not represented in Grand Lodge, but in 1838 and
up to and in 1841 it was regularly represented.
Although the lodge had passed through the
stormy period intact, yet from 1841 it ceased its existence and its
place became vacant.
On August 23, 1859, M.·. W.·.
Brother Horace M. Stokes, Grand Master, issued a dispensation for the
organization of New Lisbon Lodge No. -, at New Lisbon, Columbiana County.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge held at Columbus, October 18-21, 1859, a charter was granted to
New Lisbon Lodge No.65 at New Lisbon.
The petitioners having requested that the
old name and number should be assigned to the new lodge, and although
a new organization in all respects, it was so ordered by the Grand Lodge.
The officers under its charter were Brothers
Joseph F. Vance, W. M.; Abijah McLean, S. W., and R. B. Pritchard, J.
W.
A history of the present New Lisbon Lodge
Will doubtless be prepared for insertion in its order in the History
of Subordinate Lodges.
Brother Robert W. Taylor, a former member
of Congress and now a Judge of the U. S. Circuit Court, is a member
of New Lisbon Lodge.
One hundred and seventy-three members are
now enrolled by this prosperous lodge.
GUERNSEY LODGE NO. 66 OF CAMBRIDGE,
GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO
In the very complete history of Guernsey
Lodge No.66, prepared by Brother M. R. Potter of Cambridge, a copy is
given of the dispensation issued by M. Brother John Snow on August 14,
1822, to Brothers James M. Bell, Lloyd Talbott, Benjamin F. Bill, Andrew
Metcalf, and others, "To open and hold a regular lodge of Master
Masons in the town of Cambridge and County of Guernsey," etc.
This is followed by a copy of the charter
issued to Guernsey Lodge No.66, and dated January 15, 1823.
Brother Potter is entitled to much credit
for his research in finding and caring for the old records and papers
pertaining to the early Masonry in Guernsey County.
For some years Guernsey Lodge was a prosperous
body and had built and owned its own hall, but reverses came, and in
this connection Brother Potter states that "September 4, 1838,
the hall and lot were sold to the Cambridge Academy for $630. While
no cause for the disbanding of Guernsey Lodge No.66 is spread on the
Minutes, undoubtedly the forming of an anti-Masonic party in Western
New York was the direct one, it having polled 33,000 votes in 1828,
70,000 in 1829, and 128,000 in 1830, spreading over a majority of the
Northern States; the campaigns in New York and Pennsylvania on Masonic
issues exceeded in venom any ever known in the country. Masons were
excluded from churches and their children denied the privilege of schools.
In the Presidential election of 1832, the year in which an anti-Masonic
candidate was nominated against Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay (both
Freemasons and Past Grand Masters), but one State, Vermont, was carried
by the anti-Masonic party. After that blow to the hopes of its misguided
flowers it steadily declined in numbers and influence, and finally nothingness.
"While, as above stated, Guernsey
Lodge left no official record of their reasons for disbanding, the fore-going
is without doubt the principal one, as no work was done by the lodge
for seven years prior to the winding up of its affairs, the last member
being received in 1831, and we are informed by Col. C. P.S. Sarchet
that no lodge meetings were held in this interval, it being dangerous
for Masons to assemble together in Cambridge at this time."
The defection that occurred must have been
the result of unforseen circumstances, as in 1828 six of the Brethren
of Guernsey Lodge applied to Grand High Priest Charles P. Sherman for
and obtained a dispensation for a Mark Lodge at Cambridge.
Its history and a copy of the dispensation
have been carefully written up by Brother Potter, and should be included
in the future history of Freemasonry in Cambridge.
CAMBRIDGE LODGE NO. 66 OF CAMBRIDGE,
GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO
On October 11, 1849, M. .W. Brother M.
Z. Kreider, Grand Master, issued a dispensation to Brothers R. H. Sedwick,
D. K. Wiser, Washington Maynard, Jeremiah Jefferson, D. Daniels, J.
S. King, James Motte, George Clancy, Matthew Gaston, and others to organize
Cambridge Lodge, U. D., at Cambridge, Guernsey County.
On October 16th, at the Annual Communication
of the Grand Lodge in 1850, a charter was granted to Cambridge Lodge
No.66, giving it the vacant number of Guernsey Lodge. The charter was
issued October 18, 1850, signed by M.·. W.·. Brother William
B. Hubbard, Grand Master.
In the membership of this lodge and for
two terms its Worshipful Master was that eminent Mason, Brother Killian
H. VanRensselaer, the father and progenitor of the Scottish Rite in
Ohio and Sovereign Grand Commander of the Supreme Council 330 A. &
A. S. Rite of the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction of the United States.
In this connection it is pertinent to state
that it was to his indomitable perseverance, courage, and tact that
all of the warring elements of Scottish Rite Masonry were united, by
the union of 1867 into one body that has now grown to immense proportions
and great wealth.
Brother VanRensselaer was the descendant
of Masonic ancestry and was made a Mason in the State of New York during
the period of the anti-Masonic persecutions, and was ever one of Masonry's
stanch defenders.
Brother E. W. Matthews, Sr., another Past
Master of Cambridge Lodge, is also honored in the Scottish Rite, having
some years since been advanced to the Grade of an Honorary 33 .
There is much that is of interest that
should be embodied in a future history of this lodge foreshadowed by
the interesting paper of Brother Potter. It is therefore to be hoped
that he will continue his historical work.
Cambridge Lodge is a very prosperous Masonic
body; it has a fine Temple and has 288 numbers.
OXFORD LODGE NO. 67 OF OXFORD BUTLER
COUNTY, OHIO
In 1822, on June 17th, a dispensation was
issued to Brothers A. J. Chittenden, W. M.; James R. Hughes, S. W.,
and George Dexter, J. W., for the organization of a lodge in Oxford,
Butler County, and on January 14th, at its Annual Session in 1823, the
Grand Lodge voted it a charter, and on January 16, 1823, a charter was
issued to Oxford Lodge No.67 of Oxford.
Brothers Joel Collins, Jesse Corwin, and
John Crane were early representatives of Oxford Lodge in Grand Lodge.
Although the Grand Lodge record in 1842
states that this lodge ceased to exist in 1830, yet as in 1831 Oxford
Lodge was represented in Grand Lodge, the year was doubtless 1831 instead
of 1830. It was not again represented in Grand Lodge until after its
resuscitation a dozen years later.
In the absence of any historical report
whatever from Oxford Lodge, but a meager mention can be made of the
early or later history of this old lodge.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge in 1843, held at Lancaster on October 21st, the Grand Lodge voted
that
"Whereas, Oxford Lodge, having ceased
from its labors since the year 1831, and is lately resuscitated: therefore,
"Resolved, That the dues of Oxford
Lodge No.67 be remitted to the present time."
In the following year Oxford Lodge was
represented in Grand Lodge by Brothers Alfred Luce and Elijah Vance,
and frequently thereafter by Brother Alfred Luce.
The lodge now numbers 132 members.
HUDSON LODGE NO. 68 OF HUDSON, PORTAGE
COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was granted April 6, 1822,
to Brothers Rial McArthur as W. M.; Gideon Mills, S. W., and Augustus
Baldwin, J. W., to organize Hudson Lodge U. D. at Hudson, and at the
Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge in 1823, on January 14th, a
charter was voted to Hudson Lodge No.68, which was issued on January
16th, following.
This lodge would seem to have been formed
under most favorable auspices. Brother Rial McArthur, its first Worshipful
Master, was a prominent figure in pioneer Masonry, although in this
connection it may have been that Brother McArthur, as customary in that
period, may have become its W. M. temporarily, for assisting only in
the establishment of the Lodge. As Brother William Coolman subsequently
represented the lodge in Grand Lodge, this would seem to be the most
reasonable inference.
In 1827 it was represented in Grand Lodge,
but not thereafter. In 1831 it was published in the list of delinquent
lodges, and in 1842 it was reported to have ceased to exist in 1830.
Its existence was but brief, and its number is vacant.
NEWARK LODGE NO. 69 (Now 97) OF NEWARK,
LICKING COUNTY, OHIO
In its printed History it is correctly
stated that "Newark Lodge No. 97 F. & A. M. was organized April
5, 1822, under dispensation. The first regular communication of the
lodge was held in a room in the Bell Tavern, on the south side of the
Public Square, of which Colonel William W. Gault, one of the petitioners,
was the proprietor.
"The Reverend Stoddard S. Miles was
the first Worshipful Master, and Brothers Lucius Smith and Zachariah
Davis, Senior and Junior Wardens; Brother James M. Taylor, Treasurer,
and Brother David Bell, Secretary. The members present were Colonel
William W. Gault, A. Root, Thomas Taylor, Stephen McDongal, Harvey R.
Gilmore, and John H. Cleveland.
"The bylaws adopted are not only an
elegant specimen of 'quill-pen' penmanship, but were explicit terse,
and forcible. Section 2 provided that No spirituous liquors shall
on any occasion be admitted into the lodge.' The annual dues were one
dollar and fifty cents. Visitors after their third visit were expected
to pay twelve and one-half cents at each visit."
At the meeting of the Grand Lodge in 1823
the dispensation was continued.
"The membership being small between
1824 and 1828, no meetings are recorded. In 1828 Brother Joshua Downer,
of Zanesville, Deputy Grand Master, issued a new dispensation to the
lodge with Brother Corrington W. Searle as Worshipful Master. The second
dispensation fee was returned to Newark Lodge by the Grand Lodge. The
Grand Lecturer, Brother Thomas Launders, of Zanesville, was a frequent
visitor, and at the regular communication held November 21, 1828, among
those present were the Deputy Grand Master, R.·. W.·.
Brother Joshua Downer, of Zanesville, and the Reverend Brother S. S.
Miles.
"Owing to the bitter denunciation
of Freemasonry and the vituperation and slanders against its adherents,
between 1829 and 1838 there was but little if any work, and of necessity
not many meetings. In 1829, however, at the height of the anti-Masonic
persecutions a charter was granted to Newark Lodge No.97 F. & A.
M."
No reason was assigned for the change in
number from 69 to 97, but as had occurred in some other instances, another
U. D. Lodge was about the same time given the same number and was subsequently
chartered as No.69, and the change in its number, doubtless, was considered
to be the most ready disposition of a clerical error.
"Between 1830 and 1838 the Reverend
Brother Miles and a number of Brethren removed from Newark, making it
difficult to obtain a working number. Other Brethren, however, about
it that time (1838) having located in Newark, a renewed interest was
had in Newark Lodge. Brother Henry W. R. Brunner was sent in its behalf
to the Grand Lodge in that year, and Newark Lodge was authorized by
the Grand Lodge of Ohio to resume its labors under its charter.
"In December of 1838, Brother David
S. Wilson was elected and installed Worshipful Master, but died in October,
1839, before the completion of his term of office. Brother Wilson was
the father of the late Hon. James F. Wilson, United States Senator from
Iowa.
"In 1838-39 there was quite an accession
by initiations to the membership of the lodge. Prominent among the initiates
were Brothers S. H. Bancroft, George W. Moule, William M. D. Ryan, Dr.
Edward Stanberry, A. D. Bigelow, and Samuel White, Jr.
"At the November communication in
1839, M.·. W.·. Brother John Barney presided and installed
W. Brother Samuel H. Bancroft, who served as W. Master several years
and subsequently died in California, having been among the emigrants
of 1849 to the gold felds. In 1830 Newark Lodge was represented in Grand
Lodge by Brothers H. W. R. Brunner, Richard Stadden, and Jonathan Moody
Smith.
"W. Brother Bancroft was followed
as Worshipful Master by Brother A. D. Bigelow. General Bigelow afterwards
removed to Cleveland. Zealous and devoted to Freemasonry, in 1851 he
was elected Deputy Grand Master by the Grand Lodge of Ohio, and subsequently
died of yellow fever in New Orleans before the completion of his official
term.
"Brother Jonathan Moody Smith was
a very scholarly gentleman and ended his years in the Treasury Department
at Washington, D. C.
"Brother William M. D. Ryan subsequently
entered the Methodist ministry, for which he had been preparing, and
he attained some celebrity in that connection. In 1839 he was appointed
Grand Orator of the Grand Lodge of Ohio.
"Among the names of other eminent
Brethren who were members or initiates of Newark Lodge No.97, are Brothers
William B. Woods, one of the Judges of the Supreme Court of the United
States; General Charles R. Woods, Dr. Thomas B. Hood, the Reverend James
Gilruth, Past Grand Master M.·. W.·. Brother W. M. Cunningham,
and Past Grand Master M.·. W.·. Brother Lewis P. Schaus.
"Whilst there are many other names
of whom interesting reminiscences might be written, space, not inclination,
prevents further reference thereto. In this connection, however, as
a connecting link between the past and present, the following incident
will not, perhaps, be deemed as out of place: By the initiation of Sanford
Cunningham in 1873 there resulted the rather unusual occurrence of three
generations in one family made Masons in the same lodge, viz: John Cunningham,
initiated in 1840, who served Newark Lodge as its Secretary for many
years, and departed this life in 1884; William M. Cunningham, initiated
in 1850, was Worshipful Master in 1858 and 1859, and Grand Master of
Masons in Ohio in 1878 and 1879; and Sanford Cunningham, made a Mason
in 1873, and was the Grand Representative of the Grand Lodge of Idaho
near the Grand Lodge of Ohio, when he was removed to the world beyond
in 1880."
It is also pertinent to note herein that
the late Brother David C. Winegarner, a Past District Lecturer and member
of Newark Lodge No.97, was the M. I. Grand Master in the Grand Council
of R. & S. M. of Ohio. Brothers Alonzo P. Taylor and A. F. Crayton
served as District Lecturers, and the Nineteenth District is now represented
by W. Brother Addison L. Rawlings, a member also of Newark Lodge No.97.
A more complete History of this lodge is
ready for publication in its order.
Three hundred and three members are now
upon the roll of Newark Lodge.
MERIDIAN SUN LODGE NO. 69 OF RICHFIELD,
MEDINA COUNTY, OHIO
On September 5, 1823, a dispensation was
issued to Brothers Isaac Wilton, W. M.; Isaac M. Morgan, S. W., and
Abraham Freese, J. W., for the organization of a lodge at Richfield,
Medina County.
In the list of lodges represented the following
year it was noted as No.70. On January 14, 1824, at the Annual Communication
of the Grand Lodge it was granted a charter as Meridian Sun Lodge No.69,
al though Newark Lodge, continued under dispensation the preceding year,
had been listed with the same number. It's existence, however, was brief.
Brothers Jesse Moore and Willis Welton were its latest representatives
in Grand Lodge.
The Grand Lodge record states that it ceased
work in 1828, although in 1830 it was reported as represented. Number
69 is yet a vacant number on the Grand Lodge roll and should be restored
to Newark Lodge No.97, to which it justly belonged.
Of other lodges established under dispensation
in 1823 and 1824 are the following, viz:
CHESTER LODGE NO. 71 OF CHESTER,
MEIGS COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was granted by the Grand
Lodge at its Annual Session in 1824 to Brother "Simeon DeWitt Drown
and his associates, to hold a lodge at Chester, Meigs County."
This lodge was granted a charter in 1825
by the Grand Lodge. In 1827 it was represented in Grand Lodge by Brothers
John C. Bestow and Theodore S. Ney. It became defunct in 1831, according
to the Grand Lodge record.
GEORGETOWN LODGE NO. 72 OF GEORGETOWN,
BROWN COUNTY, OHIO
A dispensation was issued on January 17,
1824, to Brothers Robert Allen as W. M.; Jesse R. Grant, S. W., and
John Lindsey, J. W., for the formation of a lodge at Georgetown, Brown
County.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge held at Columbus in 1825, at its session on January 11th a charter
was granted to Georgetown Lodge No.72 of Georgetown, Brown County.
Subsequently it was represented in Grand
Lodge by Brother Jesse R. Grant (the father of Gen. U. S. Grant), Thomas
L. Hamer, and others.
The Grand Lodge record states that its
charter was surrendered in 1832.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge held at Lancaster, June 19, 1838, a dispensation was granted to
"John D. White and his associates" for the organization of
Georgetown Lodge No. -, at Georgetown, Brown County, and at the Annual
Meeting of the Grand Lodge in 1839 it was voted a charter, which was
issued October 17, 1839, to Georgetown Lodge No.72 of Georgetown, assigning
to it its old number.
It is much regretted that no historical
report was made by Georgetown Lodge, the foregoing information being
entirely derived from Grand Lodge records. Among its early representatives
in Grand Lodge were Brothers John D. White, John T. Smiley, and Peter
L. Wilson.
Of these, Brother Peter L. Wilson was for
many years subsequently one of the useful members of the Grand Lodge,
a quiet, unassuming, genial gentleman of the old school, doubtless without
personal aspirations for office, as he was not accorded any official
honors in Grand Lodge.
One hundred and twenty members are on the roster of Georgetown Lodge
No.72.
The only other lodge organized prior to
1825 was Harrison Lodge at Cadiz, Harrison County, of which it was ordered
by the Grand Lodge in annual Session on January 14, 1824, " that
a dispensation be granted to Walter B. Beebe and his associates to hold
a lodge at Cadiz, by the name of Harrison Lodge." No charter was
issued and no mention is made of its organization under its dispensation.
The digression for the purpose of giving
the history of the pioneer subordinate lodges, a contemporaneous part
of the History of the Grand Lodge, has been greater than anticipated,
owing to the difficulty in determining the particular period that would
entitle them to a pioneer character. In this connection, therefore,
all subordinate lodges organized prior to 1825 have been placed in the
pioneer list.
The history of other Grand Lodge affairs
is therefore now resumed; and in this connection the recital of disciplinary
matters relating to subordinate lodges or their members are omitted
herein as not being an essential feature in Grand Lodge historical affairs.
In 1817 the Grand Lodge changed the date
of its Annual Communications from January to August. In consequence
of that change the Grand Lodge on August 4, 1817, held a second Annual
Communication within that year.
At this Grand Communication the Reverend
Brother and Bishop Philander Chase, the founder of Kenyon College, was
requested to deliver an address to the Grand Lodge, and upon his acceptance,
on the second day of the session the Grand Lodge, preceded by a band
of music, marched in procession to the Presbyterian Church and listened
to the address of the learned Bishop, with which the Grand Lodge was
so well pleased that at its next session a vote of thanks was extended
to the Reverend Brother, with the sum of fifty dollars "as a testimony
of their respect for the discourse."
At this meeting of the Grand Lodge, Bishop
Chase was elected as Grand Chaplain.
The Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge
of Ohio in 1818 "was held in the borough of Columbus, December
14th."
Although an effort had been made from time
to time to change the meeting place of the Grand Lodge from Chillicothe
to some other town, the effort was unsuccessful, and any proposed change
was defeated, until the August Communication of the Grand Lodge in 1817,
at which time the Grand Lodge voted to hold its Annual Communication
of 1818 at Columbus.
The Grand Master and Deputy Grand Master,
both of Chillicothe, not being in attendance, the Senior Grand Warden,
R.·. W.·. Brother Chester Griswold of New England Lodge
No.4, presided as Grand Master.
A representation from thirty-one subordinate
lodges was present. The business of the session was mostly routine only.
M.·. W.·. Brother Chester Griswold was elected Grand Master
and R.·. W.·. Brother Benjamin Gardiner was elected Grand
Secretary, succeeding R.·. W.·. Brother Robert Kercheval
of Chillicothe, who had served as Grand Secretary from 1813 to 1818.
In 1819 and even earlier the Grand Lodge
had a number of grievance cases under consideration, and its conservative
action, and prompt discipline, where demanded, have not been surpassed
in later years.
The list of lodges showed fifty-seven subordinate
lodges on the roll, but with no returns or representation from eight
lodges, whilst two others, Ripley No.47 and Aurora No.52, were discontinued.
At the Grand Communication held at Columbus,
December 13, 1819, M.·. W.·. Brother John Snow of New
England Lodge No.4, was elected Grand Master and R.·. W.·.
Brother Benjamin Gardiner was re-elected Grand Secretary.
On December 11, 1820, the Grand Lodge again
held its Annual Communication in Columbus, the Grand Master presiding.
At this meeting of the Grand Lodge it was
voted that no lodge should "initiate any person" from the
vicinity of another lodge unless by recommendation of the lodge within
whose jurisdiction he was a resident.
It was voted also at this session "that
no refreshment hereafter be introduced into this Grand Lodge."
A proof sheet of diplomas from a plate
engraved by Brother John C. Nutman of Cincinnati received the approval
of the Grand Lodge.
R.·. W.·. Brother John Snow
was re-elected Grand Master and was also elected as Grand Lecturer.
R.·. W.·. Brother Abram I.
McDowell of Columbus was elected Grand Secretary, succeeding R.·.
W.·. Brother Benjamin Gardiner.
The revised bylaws follow the proceedings.
Appended to the bylaws adopted by the Grand
Lodge in 1820, are the following enactments:
RESOLUTIONS OF THE GRAND LODGE (1820)
FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF SUBORDINATE
LODGES UNDER ITS JURISDICTION
"Resolved, That no lodge, in the absence
of the Master and Wardens, shall initiate, Craft, or raise, unless a
Past Master is present to preside.
"Resolved, That all applications for
initiation, or for membership, shall lie over at least from one regular
meeting to another, unless three-fourths of the members present decide
the application to be a case of emergency.
"Resolved, That no subordinate lodge
shall confer the degrees of Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master
Mason on any person for a less sum than fifteen dollars; and a unanimous
vote shall be necessary to initiate or advance.
"Resolved, That each subordinate lodge
shall pay to the Grand Lodge, at each Annual Communication, fifty cents
for each initiation, and twenty-five cents for each member thereto belonging.
"Resolved, That no subordinate lodge
shall hereafter take notes of hand for fees, or grant any time of credit
therefor.
"Done in Grand Lodge, at Columbus,
December, A. D., 1820, A. L. 5820.
"ABRAHAM I. MCDOWELL,
"Grand Secretary"
In 1821 the Grand Lodge again called its
Annual Communication in Columbus (December 10th).
The report of the Committee on the Report
of the Grand Lecturer was a paper of much interest, and although somewhat
of a disciplinary character, its historically interesting conclusion
is quoted as follows:
"It is evident that many, if not all
the lodges, are too much in the practice of indulging in excessive and
sumptuous refreshments, thereby in a great degree impairing their ability
to perform those charitable acts which ever have been regarded as the
fundamental and primary principles of our Masonic superstructure. From
a view of the whole report, the committee are induced to recommend to
the Grand Lodge the adoption of the following resolutions:
"'1. Resolved, That____,____,____
and____ Lodges be cited to appear, by their proper officers, before
the Grand Lodge at its next Annual Communication, and show cause why
their respective charters should not be declared forfeited.
"'2. Resolved, That the Master of____and
the Treasurer of____ be summoned to appear before the Grand Lodge at
its next annual session, and show cause why they should not be dealt
with for their contumacious and un-masonic conduct toward the Grand
Lecturer, when in the discharge of his duties as such.
"'3. Resolved, That some suitable
person or persons be appointed to receive the jewels and effects of____
and____Lodges on behalf of the Grand Lodge, and dispose of them in such
manner as shall be most conducive to the interest of the Fraternity.
"'4. Resolved, That the Grand Lodge
do recommend to the subordinate lodges within its Jurisdiction the discontinuance
of refreshments.'
"Which report and resolutions, being
heard and maturely considered by the Grand Lodge, were adopted."
At this session of the Grand Lodge from
among the distinguished Brethren present, Brother Elisha Whittlesey
of Warren was elected Deputy Grand Master and Brother Thomas Corwin
of Lebanon was elected as Grand Orator.
The date of the Annual Communication having
been changed from December to January, no Annual Communication of the
Grand Lodge was held in 1822.
The Annual Meeting of 1823 was held in
Columbus, commencing January 13th, M.·. W.·. Brother Snow
presiding.
Among eminent Brethren in attendance were
the Hon. Charles R. Sherman and the Hon. Joshua R. Giddings.
The subject of a General Grand Lodge being
one of the most important questions then under discussion in the Grand
Lodges of the United States, the action of the Grand Lodge of Ohio in
that connection is given herewith:
"The committee appointed to take into
consideration and report on the proceedings of a meeting of Masons held
in the City of Washington, on the 9th of March, 1822, recommending the
establishment of a General Grand Lodge of the United States, made a
report, which being duly considered is approved and adopted, as follows:
"'The select committee to whom was
referred the communications from the committee of "A meeting of
a number of members of the Society of Freemasons from various parts
of the United States, composed of members of Congress and strangers,
assembled at the Capitol, in the City of Washington, March 9, 1822,
recommending the establishment of a General Grand Lodge of the United
States," and also, communications on the same subject from the
Grand Lodges of Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Indiana ask leave very respectfully
to report:
"'That they have bestowed upon the
communications and the subject matter committed to them every attention
that their limited time and range of inquiry would allow, and now submit
the following as a synopsis of their views on the subject: The proposition
to establish a General Grand Lodge of the United States seems to embrace
three objects, which are specified in the communication from the aforesaid
general committee, 1. A grand supervising and visitorial power over
all the Grand Lodges of the United States. 2. Uniformity among the Craft
in the manner of work. 3. The suppression of spurious books and writings.
Although to a superficial view the first of these objects seems to present
a keystone to an edifice apparently yet unfinished, yet your committee
believe that a clear and ample examination of the situation and standing
of the Grand Lodges throughout the United States with satisfy every
Mason whose eye is single to the ancient landmarks and the purity of
Masonry that there is no keystone wanting, that the building is complete.
In the opinion of your committee, the exercise of a jurisdiction so
extensive and so particular as that proposed, comprehending not only
the most important concerns, but the most minute affairs of subordinate
lodges, would be attended with innumerable delays, difficulties, and
embarrassments, and would produce the greatest confusion and disorder
throughout the whole Fraternity.
"' 'The second and third objects proposed
to be attained by the establishment of a General Grand Lodge, are in
the estimation of your committee devoutly to be wished, and with the
Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania they most cordially agree "that an
occasional convocation of delegates from the different Grand Lodges
would have a salutary tendency, and would furnish a remedy for many
of the evils delineated in the communication referred to them"
from Washington. The deliberations of such an august and venerable body,
consulting upon the great interests of the order, and dependent upon
the good sense and judgment of the Craft for the fulfillment of its
wishes, would be received with enthusiasm, and its recommendations performed
with alacrity.
'But inasmuch as it is yet unknown and
uncertain whether the other Grand Lodges in the United States, or any
of them, will concur with the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in sending
delegates to the proposed convocation, your committee can not at this
time recommend any definite measure upon these important points. One
other object seems to have been an inducement with the general committee
in recommending the establishment of a General Grand Lodge; that is,
"to acquire in a correspondence with foreign nations an elevated
stand for the Masonry of this country." Your committee have yet
to learn that the Craft in the United States have ever labored under
the want of character or respectable standing in the eye of true and
ancient Masonry.
While the old enduring landmarks of our
order are preserved, and our social intercourse with the universal Brotherhood
is governed by the level and the square, we cannot believe that the
character and standing of the Masons in the West will be less elevated
than the name of our country. Towards every innovation we shall ever
march with reluctance, and say at all times with heartfelt devotion,
we are unwilling to change. Your committee recommend, therefore, the
adoption of the following resolutions:
"1. Resolved, That this Grand Lodge
concurs with the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in their sentiment as expressed
in the report of their committee of the 3d of June, A. D. 1822, on the
subject of establishing a "General Grand Lodge of the United States."
'2. Resolved, That the establishment of
a General Grand Lodge of the United States is at this time inexpedient.
"'3. Resolved, That the M.·.
W.·. Grand Master of this Grand Lodge, Brother John Snow, be,
and he is hereby appointed a delegate to represent this Grand Lodge
in a General Convocation of the Grand Lodges of the United States, or
two-thirds thereof, for the purpose of establishing an uniformity of
work, and recommending such measures for the good of the Craft as they
may deem expedient: Provided, a sufficient notice of the time and place
of the meeting of said convocation shall have been by him received before
the next Grand Communication of this Grand Lodge; and in ease of the
inability of said M.·. W.·. Grand Master to attend said
convention and represent this Grand Lodge therein as aforesaid, it shall
be his duty to appoint some suitable person, as his proxy, to do the
same.
"4. Resolved, That in the opinion
of this Grand Lodge, the city of Philadelphia is a suitable place for
holding said General Convocation.
"5. Resolved, That this Grand Lodge
approves of the time suggested in the resolutions of the Grand Lodge
of Pennsylvania, namely, the 24th of June, 1823.
"6. Resolved, That the Grand Secretary
be requested. to transmit copies of the foregoing report and these resolutions
to the different Grand Lodges throughout the United States, and one
copy to William W. Seaton, Esq., at the City of Washington, agreeably
to the request contained in the communication from said general committee.
John M. Goodenow,
Elisha Whittlesey,
Calvin Washburn,
Thomas Corwin,
Charles R. Sherman
In 1824 M.·. W.·. Brother
Charles R. Sherman of Lancaster was elected Grand Master; M.·.
W.·. Brother Abram Irvin McDowell was re-elected Grand Secretary,
and W. Brother William Fielding of Sidney was elected Grand Lecturer.
Another communication having been received
from the Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia relative to the establishment
of a General Grand Lodge of the United States, the Grand Lodge of Ohio
adopted a resolution of disapproval.
The State having been divided into nine
lecture districts, the first Deputy Grand Lecturers in Ohio were: First
district, Brother Stephen Faler, Dayton; 2d, G. P. Fitzgerald, Chillicothe;
3d, Samuel Wheeler, Madison; 4th, Henry B. Curtis, Mt. Vernon; 5th,
John M. Goodenow, Steubenville; 6th, Ira Metcalf, Worthington; 7th,
William Elsberry, Xenia; 8th, William A. Whittlesey, Marietta; and 9th,
John T. Jones, of Cincinnati.
January 10, 1825, the Grand Lodge convened
in Columbus, M.·. W.·. Brother Charles P. Sherman in the
Grand Fast. Fifty-seven subordinate lodges were represented in Grand
Lodge.
M.·. W.·. Brother William
W. Irvin of Lancaster was elected Grand Master, and R.·. W.·.
Brother Henry Brown of Columbus was elected Grand Secretary.
Commencing in 1823 the subordinate lodges
holding paper charters were authorized to exchange the same for the
regular form on parchment, and in 1825 the Grand Secretary issued twenty-two
parchment charters in that connection.
At nearly every Communication of the Grand
Lodge cases for charitable relief were reported, and if found worthy
relief was granted.
A committee having been "appointed
to take into consideration the propriety of joining with the other Grand
Lodges of the United States in the erection of a monument in memory
of our deceased Brother George Washington," submitted the following
resolutions, which were concurred in by the Grand Lodge:
"Resolved, That the Grand Lodge of
Ohio most heartily concurs in opinion with the Grand Lodges of New Hampshire
and New York, as to the propriety of erecting a monument at the grave
of WASHINGTON, at Mt. Vernon, by the Masonic Fraternity.
"Resolved, That the sum of two hundred
dollars be appropriated for the purpose aforesaid out of the funds of
this Grand Lodge, whenever the sum of ten thousand dollars shall be
appropriated for the same object by the Grand Lodges of other States,
or by contributions by the Masonic Fraternity, and whenever specific
measures shall have been adopted for the erection of the work.
"Resolved, That the Grand Secretary
forthwith transmit to the several Grand Lodges in the United States
the foregoing proceedings of this Grand Lodge, with a request that whatever
may be done by them upon this subject may be immediately transmitted
to this Grand Lodge."
A resolution submitted by Brother Thomas
Corwin in re non-payment of dues and its penalties was adopted by the
Grand Lodge, and therein extreme penalties were first recognized in
this Grand Jurisdiction.
It was also ordered by the Grand Lodge
that a lodge to which a parchment charter was issued to replace one
written upon paper should "retain its original number, date, and
rank."
Five subordinate lodges were ordered to
show cause why they should not be suspended for neglecting to make return
to the Grand Lodge for two or more years.
In 1826, on January 9th, the Grand Lodge
held its Annual Communication at Columbus. The Grand Master M.·.
W.·. William W. Irvin, was in the Grand Fast. The legislation
and proceedings were of routine matters only. At that session M.·.
W.·. Brother Samuel Wheeler of Unionville, Geauga County, was
elected Grand Master, and R.·. W.·. Brother Bela Latham
of
Columbus was elected Grand Secretary.
At the Grand Communication commencing January
8, 1827, held at Columbus, M.·. W.·. Brother Wheeler presided
and representatives were in attendance from fifty-five subordinate lodges.
The affairs of the Grand Lodge in that
year required a large amount of legislation and the session covered
three days.
Brothers Thomas Corwin, Charles H. Sherman,
Joshua H. Giddings, Gustavus Swan, Thomas L. Hamer, Platt Benedict,
David Spangler, P. M. Weddel, William B. Thrall, and a number of other
distinguished Ohio citizens were present and participating in Grand
Lodge affairs.
On motion of M.·. W.·. Brother
Charles H. Sherman, a resolution was adopted recommending that the subordinate
lodges "should grant to every Brother a diploma on his receiving
the third degree."
M.·. W.·. Brother John M.
Goodenow of Steubenville was elected Grand Master and R.·. W.·.
Brother Bela Latham of Columbus was re-elected Grand Secretary.
The Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge
in 1828 was held in Columbus, January 14th to 16th, with representatives
in attendance from fifty-eight subordinate lodges.
In the absence of the Grand Master, M.·.
W.·. Brother John M. Goodenow, the Deputy Grand Master, R.·.
W.·. Brother Thomas Corwin, presided.
The jurisdiction of subordinate lodges
was defined by the adoption of the following resolution:
"Resolved, That in the Opinion of
this Grand Lodge, no subordinate lodge ought to initiate any candidate,
unless such candidate does actually reside nearer to the lodge where
the application is made, than to any other lodge, unless upon the recommendation
of the lodge, or the principal officers in the lodge, nearest his residence."
The subject of a Grand Lodge hall or building
was for several years under discussion with varied results. Proposals
were received from Columbus, Lancaster, Cincinnati, Chillicothe, Worthington,
and other towns in Ohio. Money was expended by the Grand Lodge in projects
at Lancaster and at Chillicothe, but both were abandoned after quite
an expenditure of money at each locality. While of interest, the details
of the projects, disappointments, and experiments would be too voluminous
for other than brief insertion herein.
In relation to the membership of petitioners
for lodges working under dispensation, on motion of Brother henry B.
Curtis, it was:
"Resolved, as the sense of the Grand
Lodge, That in all cases where any subordinate lodge has heretofore,
or may hereafter, forward a recommendation to the Grand Lodge in favor
of any number of Brethren applying to the Grand Lodge to obtain a dispensation,
a part or the whole of whom have been or may be members of such lodge
so recommending, such recommendation shall be considered as a dimission
from the lodge so recommending, so soon as such Brethren shall have
obtained such dispensation, and have become organized; Provided, such
members thus dimitted first pay all dues to which the lodge may be entitled
at the time."
At this Grand Communication M.·.
W.·. Brother Thomas Corwin of Lebanon was elected Grand Master
and R.·. W.·. Brother Bela Latham was re-elected Grand
Secretary.
The Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge
in 1829 was held in the town of Worthington, commencing January 5th.
In the absence of the Grand Master, Past
Grand Master John Snow presided. The only Grand officers present were
R.·. W.·. Brother Joshua Downer, Deputy Grand Master;
R.·. W.·. Brother Lincoln Goodale, Grand Treasurer; R.·.
W.·. Brother Bela Latham, Grand Secretary, and W. Brother William
John, Grand Tyler. Forty-four subordinate lodges only were represented
in Grand Lodge, with over one hundred lodges on its roll.
At this Annual Meeting a resolution was
adopted providing for the payment by the Grand Lodge of mileage and
per diem to one delegate from each lodge. It is presumed in the absence
of any reference thereto that each lodge had previously compensated
its representative when deemed necessary.
At this session charitable relief was extended
to widows and orphans in eleven cases submitted by the Committee on
Charity.
Two days only were required for the Annual
Meeting in 1829. M.·. W.·. Brother John Snow of Worthington
was elected Grand Master, and R.·. W.·. Brother Bela Latham
we re-elected Grand Secretary.
The Annual Communication of 1830 was again
held at Worthington, commencing on January 4th, with the Grand Master
presiding and an attendance of representatives from fifty-nine subordinate
lodges. As an interesting incident it may be mentioned that at this
session one hundred dollars was voted to be sent to the widow of Past
Grand Master Judge Charles H. Sherman and asking her to "receive
it as a token of the respect this Grand Lodge entertains for the memory
and public services of her departed husband, and of the sympathy which
is felt in her bereavement."
At this period in the history of the Grand
Lodge the animosity of the anti-Masonic political party and the relentless
and bitter denunciation and persecution of Freemasons by its fanatical
following had become very serious in Ohio, as in other States. In some
instances lodge rooms were defaced and stoned; sticks and stones were
thrown at Masonic processions, with hoots and yells, even upon the occasion
of funeral processions.
The fanaticism also of weak-minded, disloyal
converts to their pharisaical pretense of the wickedness of secrecy
and Masonic obligations and a religious duty requiring their renunciation,
was apparent in many lodges. As an instance, at the Annual Communication
in 1830 on motion of the distinguished Brother Joshua R. Giddings it
was "Ordered, That the Grand Secretary be and he is hereby directed
to issue a new charter to Jefferson Lodge No.87, the former charter
having been mutilated by the violence of some evil, disposed and weak,
minded person unknown."
The anti-Masonic spirit prevailing, however,
in that locality was of such a character that in 1835 Brother Giddings
enclosed the charter of Jefferson Lodge No.87 in a letter to the Grand
Lodge, and on recommendation of the Committee on Charters and Dispensations,
it was "Resolved, That the Grand Lodge rescind said charter, and
the Secretary be ordered to place the same on file."
As over three-quarters of a century has
now elapsed since the occurrences mentioned, a brief statement of their
origin may be of interest.
In 1826 one William Morgan of Batavia,
New York, a mason by trade, a man about fifty years of age, and of dissolute
habits and loose principles and at times very intemperate, but of good
address when sober, having been, it is claimed, incensed at being excluded
from membership in a Masonic body, and being desirous of both money
and revenge, proposed the publication of an "Exposition of the
Secrets of Freemasonry," and for its publication entered into a
partnership with David C. Miller, a printer, who also claimed to be
a Mason, the publisher of a newspaper in Batavia and an impecunious
politician of intemperate habits, who claimed that Masonic influence
had caused his paper to become unprofitable.
Both believed that the scheme, if sufficiently
advertised, would prove a matter of great pecuniary profit. Miller subsequently
claimed that an attempt had been made to burn his printing office. Morgan
having been arrested and jailed in an adjoining town for petit larceny
and for debt, it was claimed that a party of three or more persons who
had compromised the suit and settled the claim against Morgan secured
his liberation from jail, and that after his entering into a carriage
with these persons he was abducted, taken to Canada, and afterwards
murdered, as from that time it was said that William Morgan was never
again seen, although an officer of the American Embassy at Constantinople
claimed to have seen him in that city, and another man claimed to have
seen him in Central America.
For the purpose of carrying out the designs
of the nefarious political tricksters, it was alleged that the abductors
of Morgan were Freemasons and that the Fraternity was responsible for
his disappearance.
When it is considered that Morgan himself
was too shrewd to have placed himself in the hands of those whom he
would have considered his enemies; and that although there are doubtless
fools in all associations, yet it would be difficult to conceive of
any such shallow-minded and ignorant Freemason as would have given any
serious attention to the pretensions of Morgan, much less to have entered
into a conspiracy for taking his life.
The absurdity of the charge is more apparent
also when it is considered that Miller, who was the responsible one
for the publication of the book, was unmolested. The book when published
proved to be unremunerative. Books of the same character previously
published in England were doubtless its prototypes.
Although every effort was made for political
purposes to substantiate the charge, its flimsy character is apparent
in the many fruitless trials had in that connection.
Miller, the publisher, was later elected
clerk of the county, as one of the first fruits of the anti-Masonic
movement, on the wave of which Alfred H. Tracy in 1829 was elected State
Senator in the Eighth New York District and Millard Fillmore was elected
to the State Assembly. In that and other States many politicians of
the period, among its promoters, became prominent and successful in
their aspirations in State and national affairs. The nomination of Wirt,
however, for President, on the anti-Masonic ticket, did not prove to
be the success anticipated, one State only, Vermont, voting in his favor.
After that election the anti-Masonic party influence waned rapidly.
A few of its political promoters, however, subsequently became prominent
in national affairs.
At the Annual Meeting of 1830, held at
Worthington; January 4th and 5th, M.·. W.·. Brother William
Fielding of Sidney was elected Grand Master, R.·. W.·.
Brother David Spangler of Zanesville, Deputy Grand Master, and R.·.
W.·. Brother John L. Starling of Columbus elected Grand Secretary.
The amount of the payroll in 1830 was $570.35.
Fifty-five representatives receiving mileage and per diem. The father
of General Grant, Brother Jesse P. Grant of Georgetown, was one of the
member present. As may be noted, with eighty-four chartered lodges and
seven U. D. lodges reported as working lodges, ten lodges having ceased
their existence, but fifty-five lodges were represented in Grand Lodge.
The Annual Meeting in 1831 was held at
Columbus January 3, 1831. The Grand Master and Deputy Grand Master were
not present, and Past Grand Master M.·. W.·. Brother John
M. Goodenow was in the Grand East.
The list of representatives shows that
forty-two subordinate lodges were represented; the Grand Lodge record,
however, states that there were "thirty-four lodges only represented
and sixty-five lodges not represented," doubtless a clerical error.
Twenty-five lodges were reported as delinquent, charters were granted
to two new lodges, and one lodge was voted a dispensation.
On motion of Brother George James, "a
Ways and Means Committee' was made one of the standing committees of
the Grand Lodge.
M.·. W.·. Brother John Satterthwaite
of Waynesville, Warren County, was elected Grand Master, and R.·.
W.·. Brother John L. Starling of Columbus was re-elected Grand
Secretary.
The 1832 Annual Meeting was held in Columbus
on January 2nd; in the absence of the Grand Master, Deputy Grand Master,
and Grand Senior Warden, the Grand Junior Warden, R.·. W.·.
Brother George James of Zanesville, presided. Thirty-five subordinate
lodges only were represented in Grand Lodge.
M.·. W.·. Brother Charles
Anthony of Springfield was elected Grand Master; Brother George James
of Zanesville, Deputy Grand Master; and Brother John C. Broderick of
Columbus was elected Grand Secretary, succeeding the late R.·.
W.·. Brother John L. Starling, who had died within the year.
At the opening of the Grand Lodge R.·.
W.·. Brother George James of Zanesville, Junior Grand Warden;
R.·. W.·. Brother Lincoln Goodale of Columbus, Grand Treasurer;
W. Brother William J. Reese of Lancaster, Grand Senior Deacon, and W.
Brother William John of Columbus, Grand Tyler, were the only elected
officers present.
The other officers were all pro tem. appointments,
Grand Master Anthony and Deputy Grand Master James not being present.
At the Annual Meeting of the Grand Lodge
held at Columbus, January 7, 1833, the Senior Grand Warden, R.·.
W.·. Brother Timothy Baker of Norwalk, presided. The Grand Senior
Warden, Grand Treasurer, Grand Secretary, and Grand Tyler were the only
elected Grand officers present; the other officers were all pro tem.
appointments for that Annual Communication.
Thirty-eight subordinate lodges were represented
in Grand Lodge and sixty-three lodges were unrepresented.
The business of the Annual Meeting was
of the usual legislative character only. M.·. W.·. Brother
Timothy Baker of Norwalk was elected Grand Master and R.·. W.·.
Brother John C. Broderick of Columbus was re-elected Grand Secretary.
At the Annual Communication of January
6, 1834, held at Columbus, the Grand Master, M.·. W.·.
Brother Timothy Baker, presided.
Thirty out of one hundred and one subordinate
lodges on the roll were represented in Grand Lodge. For the first time
in some years all of the elected officers (except the Grand Tyler) were
present.
At this session the proposed establishment
at Steubenville of a manual labor school for the orphan boys of Masons,
under the auspices of the Grand Lodge, was first suggested, and like
the proposed Grand Lodge building was considered from time to time at
a number of Annual Communications, but with no final, favorable result.
The payroll of the Grand Lodge at this
session amounted to only $247.80. The epidemic of the Asiatic cholera
in many places and the continuation of the anti-Masonic influences were
doubtless a sufficient cause for the Masonic apathy then prevailing.
As may have been noted, during the period
mentioned a number of Grand Masters and other Grand officers only served
as such officers at the Annual Communication at which they were elected
and installed.
M.·. W.·. Brother William
J. Reese of Lancaster was elected Grand Master and R.·. W.·.
Brother John C. Broderick of Columbus was re-elected Grand Secretary.
From this date the tenure of official position resumed former conditions.
In 1835 the Grand Master, M.·. W.·.
Brother William J. Reese, presided at the Annual Meeting, commencing
on January 5th at Columbus. Twenty-six subordinate lodges only were
represented at the Annual Communication of that year.
At this meeting the Committee on Foreign
Communications in their report expressed their great satisfaction at
"the brightening prospects of the Fraternity from the troubles
and gloom which for a time have surrounded it."
That the status of Freemasonry in other
States at that period may be fully understood, the report of that committee
will doubtless be of much interest in this connection. It is stated
in the "Proceedings" that the Reverend Brother J. Kilbourn,
from the Committee on Foreign Communications, made the following report,
which was accepted:
"The committee to whom were referred
the communications and correspondence of foreign Grand Lodges, have
carefully examined the same viz: from the Grand Lodges of Louisiana,
Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, Florida, North Carolina,
Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, New Hampshire,
and Vermont, and find nothing therein requiring the action of this Grand
Lodge, further than to reciprocate the favors received. Your committee,
however, remark with great satisfaction, from every quarter, the brightening
prospects of the fraternity from the troubles and gloom which have surrounded
it in many parts; especially in the firm, consistent, and efficient
course pursued by the Grand Lodges of New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont,
except the general provision of the latter in regard to the resigning
of charters. The committee have directed their chairman to read, as
a part of this report, an address to the Grand Lodge of Rhode Island,
etc., contained in pages 6, 7, and 8 of their communication of June,
1834, and some resolutions of the Grand Lodge of Vermont, passed in
October last; which are as follows:
"'To the M.·. W.·. Grand
Lodge of the State of Rhode Island, etc.: The committee appointed to
draw up a statement of facts respecting the recent Proceedings of this
Grand Lodge, in surrendering their civil charter, or act of incorporation,
to the General Assembly of said State, and also respecting the present
situation of the Masonic institution in this State, respectfully report:
"That the more immediate cause for
surrendering the civil charter was, that the Grand Lodge preferred that
course rather than to submit to a law, passed at the last January session
of the Legislature, requiring all the incorporated Masonic bodies in
this State to make annual returns to the General Assembly of their proceedings,
with a list of all their members; and, in doing which, the Grand Lodge
has surrendered nothing more to the General Assembly than what they
had received from that body, it being a naked charter of incorporation,
which only enabled the Grand lodge to hold property and to act as a
corporate body; without conferring any Masonic power or privileges.
This charter was received by the Grand Lodge at a time when it was common
for nearly all the societies and companies in this State to petition
the General Assembly for corporate powers, but which had become entirely
useless in consequence of the Grand Lodge being without property. By
retaining the charter, which, being viewed as a contract between the
power granting it and the corporation created by that power, the Grand
Lodge were considered as being amenable to the Legislature, and liable
to vexatious inquiries and odious exactions, which they now feel themselves
absolved from.
"The Grand Lodge likewise recommended
to the several subordinate lodges under its jurisdiction, having charters
of incorporation from the General Assembly, to surrender them; several
of which have already done so, after placing their property in the hands
of trustees, for the benefit of said lodges; but no subordinate lodge
has, to our knowledge, even intimated a wish to surrender their Masonic
charter to the Grand Lodge, and, at its last annual meeting, returns
were received from all but three lodges, with a list of their officers.
"As lodges in other States have not
been incorporated, the civil and Masonic charters have been confounded,
when spoken of in reference to this State. We wish it to be distinctly
understood by all our Masonic Brethren, either at home or abroad, that
the civil charters had no connection with the Masonic charters; that
the Grand Lodge retains its Masonic powers as heretofore; and that its
members have not relinquished their rights, as citizens, to assemble
peaceably together, or to associate as Masons. To avoid the operation
of the law referred to, as it respects the Grand Lodge, its charter
of incorporation has been surrendered to the General Assembly; by doing
which, we have disarmed our enemies and the Legislature of all right
to visit us or interfere with our concerns, so long as we remain quiet
and peaceable subjects, and conform to the constitutional laws of the
land.
"Your committee consider it within
their province to give a brief history of the situation of the Masonic
institution in this State for a few years past. The anti-Masons, after
having formed themselves into a political party, petitioned the General
Assembly for the repeal of the Masonic charters, at the same time charging
the Masons with high crimes and misdemeanors. After some delay, the
Legislature appointed a committee from their own body to inquire into
those charges. Several Masons were summoned to meet anti-Masons and
seceders before said committee; and after a tedious investigation of
nearly a fortnight, were honorably acquitted.
"An act was then passed prohibiting
the administration of extra judicial oaths, which was evidently aimed
at the Masonic institution; as, during the investigation before the
legislative committee, it had been acknowledged that obligations were
administered in conferring the degrees of Masonry.
"The anti-Masons subsequently joined
with another political party, and, unitedly, gained the ascendency in
the Legislature; obtained a summons for the several Masonic corporations
in this State to appear before the General Assembly, to show cause why
their civil charters (or acts of incorporation) should not be declared
forfeited. Three of the corporations in this city employed able counsel,
and after a trial of ten days continuance, we came off triumphant in
public estimation.
"But the General Assembly, after recalling
six charters which they had granted conditionally, left six-teen unrepealed
which they had granted in perpetuity, as there was no proof of their
having been violated, and imposed restrictions upon them by passing
the law referred to, requiring all the incorporated Masonic bodies (during
the time they shall remain incorporated) to make annual returns to the
General Assembly.
"As it regards the present situation
of the Masonic institution in this State, your committee would observe,
that notwithstanding the enactment of the laws herein referred to, and
the vexations they have otherwise had to encounter, yet Masons do not
despond; and we hope and trust they will continue to stand firm and
"united by an indissoluble chain of sincere affection."
Respectfully submitted by
Joseph S. Cooke
Barzillai Cranston
William C. Barker
Providence, June 24, 1834
RESOLUTIONS OF THE GRAND LODGE OF
THE STATE OF VERMONT, PASSED OCTOBER 7, A. L. 5834
"Resolved, That this Grand Lodge feel
it a duty they owe themselves as well as the whole Masonic Fraternity,
to declare that, while its individual members are left to the free and
unmolested enjoyment of their sentiments upon the various subjects connected
with religion and politics, and the right to judge of men and their
actions, they hereby most solemnly declare, that Masonic bodies have
not the right to connect the institution with the sectarian or party
views of either; that any attempt thereat is a gross innovation upon
those principles, which, among good and correct Masons, are universally
acknowledged, and should be universally practiced upon.
"Resolved, That the Grand Lodge do
at this time, as they have hitherto done, declare to the world, that
the object of their associations and motives for continuing therein,
are founded upon the principles of brotherly love, relief, and truth.
They disclaim the right of Masons to inflict corporal punishment, and
acknowledge no other right to enforce obedience from its members, but
reprimand, suspension, and expulsion.
"Resolved, That the Grand Lodge recommend
to those Brethren who incline still to adhere to the institution of
Masonry, to continue to cultivate a spirit of goodwill towards those
who may differ from them respecting the origin and continuance of Freemasonry;
and while we are ready to forgive those whose fidelity has been shaken
by one of those popular commotions incident to our free institution,
we are also ready to judge with candor the motives by which they have
been governed.
"In presenting the foregoing resolutions,
your committee will close their report, in the language of one of the
late officers of this Grand Lodge, whose labors on earth are finished:
"We ask you to gaze with us upon the
ominous gathering, which to no eye can he viewless; we ask you to contemplate
its swelling aspect, its various phases, and its multiform ramifications;
listen to its busy notes of preparation and anticipate its maturity
of strength, and then imagine its consummation to have taken place.
Then cast your eyes around and see how many have quaked and quailed,
how many have fled, how many have surrendered at discretion, and how
many have renounced their faith and armed to battle us down. Then complete
the picture, and when you find the smoke and din of the conflict is
past, and the light streaming in upon us once more, not a heart flinching,
not a hand palsied, but each and every one still invincible in defense
of the mighty truth.
"If Freemasonry falls, her monument
will not crumble nor her epitaph fade. It is erected upon the everlasting
hills, it is firmly planted in the deepest valleys. The widow's prayer
of joy, the orphan's tear of gratitude, as they ascend, like the dew
before the solar influence, bear with them its eulogy and its praise.
So long as there remains a fragment of the temples of antiquity, so
long as one stone of the edifices it has consecrated shall rest upon
another, so long as brotherly love, relief, and truth obtain among men,
so long will its mausoleum endure. The waves of popular prejudice may
beat against it, the shout of popular clamor may be thrown back in echoes
from its base, the "winds and weathers" of time may press
upon it, but still it will endure; glory will encircle it, honor will
be yielded to it, and veneration will be felt for the hallowed recollections
it quickens into action. And hereafter, when he casts his eyes over
the galaxy of social institutions among men, the philanthropist will
involuntarily associate with his subject that other and celestial galaxy,
and realize, as now, from the fiat that has effected the one, so then
from the economy that controlled the other, that he will soon have to
mourn for a lost *Pleiades, which can never more be visible in the moral
Constellation."
Nathan B. Haswell, Grand Master.
Philip C. Tucker, Dep. G. M.
Lavius Fillmoee, G. S. W.
Solomon Mason, G. J. W.
B. T. Englesby, G. T.
John B. Hollenbeck, Grand Sec'y.
All of which is respectfully submitted.
James Kilbourn
R. Stewart
A. R. Cassady
* A Northern Constellation
The Grand Master, M.·. W.·.
Brother William J. Reese, and the Grand Secretary, R.·. W.·.
Brother John C. Broderick, were both re-elected.
At the Annual Communication of the Grand
Lodge held at Columbus, January 4, 1836, all of the Grand officers were
in attendance upon Grand Lodge with, however, a representation from
but twenty-three subordinate lodges.
M.·. W.·. Brother Reese and
the Grand Secretary, R.·. W.·. Brother Broderick, were
re-elected, and the Grand Lodge changed its next place of meeting from
Columbus to Lancaster.
The Annual Communication of the Grand Lodge
in 1837 was held at Lancaster, commencing June 22d. The Grand Master,
M.·. W.·. Brother William J. Reese, presided, with but
seventeen subordinate lodges represented in Grand Lodge, the lowest
number since the fifth year of its existence. The lowest point, however,
was happily reached, and from the year 1837 Freemasonry in Ohio gradually
resumed the status and influence to which it was entitled.
M.·. W.·. Brother William
James Reese of Lancaster was re-elected Grand Master, which distinguished
position he held from 1834 to 1842 inclusive. He was present and presided
at each of the Annual Communications in those years. He was a dignified,
efficient officer, a scholarly gentleman of fine address, and his Masonic
papers were of much interest.
At this Annual Communication R.·.
W.·. Brother James D. Caldwell of Chillicothe was elected Grand
Secretary, and was continuously re-elected as such until 1843.
The Deputy Grand Master, R.·. W.·.
Brother William B. Thrall, from the select committee appointed to inquire
and report what action is proper on the part of the Grand Lodge in relation
to delinquent subordinate lodges, made report:
"That they have bestowed on this most
delicate and interesting subject all the attention which their limited
time and other duties would permit; and are of the opinion that the
time has now arrived when the honor of the Grand Lodge, and the interests
of Masonry generally, demand that some decisive measure should be adopted
on the part of the Grand Lodge to assert her legitimate authority and
maintain her jurisdiction.
"There are within the jurisdiction
of the Grand Lodge many subordinate lodges that have made no report
to the Grand Lodge for several years past, and have otherwise treated
with neglect, not to say with contumely, the edicts of the Grand Lodge.
These things ought not so to be; and while permitted on the part of
the Grand Lodge, your committee deem it morally impossible for our institution
to command that respect in the estimation of the world, or even of its
own members, which its great antiquity, the purity of its principles,
and the long catalogue of its illustrious patrons should ever challenge.
A variety of modes have suggested themselves to your committee as practicable
for remedying the evil complained of. All of these modes, however, are
subject to objections more or less serious; and your committee have
endeavored to ascertain and report such course as promises the greatest
amount of benefit and presents obstacles most easily surmounted.
"Your committee are of opinion that
no radical cure can be effected by any means short of sending an officer,
clothed with the authority of the Grand Lodge, to visit the several
delinquent lodges, ascertain their present condition, make inquest of
their proceedings since their latest report to the Grand Lodge and,
if the same should be deemed necessary, to receive their charter, jewels,
and effects, and make report of his proceedings to the Grand Lodge at
its next Grand Communication. This is a service, your committee are
aware, the due execution of which requires the exercise of both prudence
and discretion, as well as firmness and decision of character. But without
the faithful performance of this duty,